GNUBoot/coreboot-kgpe-d16
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
coreboot-kgpe-d16/src/arch/arm/boot.c

32 lines
992 B
C
Raw Normal View History

Drop ELF remains from boot code This stuff is not used, so let's drop it. Change-Id: I671a5e87855b4c59622cafacdefe466ab3d70143 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3660 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-25 00:09:36 +02:00
/*
* This file is part of the coreboot project.
*
* Copyright 2013 Google Inc.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
libpayload: arm: Pass the coreboot table location to the payload. To find the coreboot tables, the payload has historically searched for their signature in a predefined region of memory. This is a little clumsy on x86, but it works because you can assume certain regions are RAM. Also, there are areas which are set aside for the firmware by convention. On x86 there's a forwarding entry which goes in one of those fairly small conventional areas and which points to the CBMEM area at the end of memory. On ARM there aren't areas like that, so we've left out the forwarding entry and gone directly to CBMEM. RAM may not start at the beginning of the address space or go to its end, and that means there isn't really anywhere fixed you can put the coreboot tables. That's meant that libpayload has to be configured on a per board basis to know where to look for CBMEM. Now that we have boards that don't have fixed amounts of memory, the location of the end of RAM isn't fixed even on a per board level which means even that workaround will no longer cut it. This change makes coreboot pass the location of the coreboot tables to libpayload using r0, the first argument register. That means we'll be able to find them no matter where CBMEM is, and we can get rid of the per board search ranges. We can extend this mechanism to x86 as well, but there may be more complications and it's less necessary there. It would be a good thing to do eventually though. BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on nyan. Changed the size of memory and saw that the payload could still find the coreboot tables where before it couldn't. Built for pit, snow, and big. BRANCH=None Original-Change-Id: I7218afd999da1662b0db8172fd8125670ceac471 Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/185572 Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit ca88f39c21158b59abe3001f986207a292359cf5) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Iab14e9502b6ce7a55f0a72e190fa582f89f11a1e Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7655 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2014-02-08 15:30:49 +01:00
#include <arch/cache.h>
loaders: add program_loading.h header file Instead of two headers for payload and ramstage loading combine the 2 files into one. This also allows for easier refactoring by keeping header files consistent. Change-Id: I4a6dffb78ad84c78e6e96c886d361413f9b4a17d Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8708 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-03-17 17:43:44 +01:00
#include <program_loading.h>
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
coreboot: introduce arch_payload_run() The selfboot() function relied on global variables within the selfboot.c compilation unit. Now that the bounce buffer is a part of struct payload use a new architecture-specific arch_payload_run() function for jumping to the payload. selfboot() can then be removed. Change-Id: Icec74942e94599542148561b3311ce5096ac5ea5 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5300 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2014-02-25 05:27:39 +01:00
void arch_payload_run(const struct payload *payload)
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
{
program loading: introduce struct prog The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more complicated execution paths such as running a program on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow on patches will allow the platform to decide how to execute a particular program. Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be fixed. Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-03-20 19:00:20 +01:00
void (*doit)(void *);
libpayload: arm: Pass the coreboot table location to the payload. To find the coreboot tables, the payload has historically searched for their signature in a predefined region of memory. This is a little clumsy on x86, but it works because you can assume certain regions are RAM. Also, there are areas which are set aside for the firmware by convention. On x86 there's a forwarding entry which goes in one of those fairly small conventional areas and which points to the CBMEM area at the end of memory. On ARM there aren't areas like that, so we've left out the forwarding entry and gone directly to CBMEM. RAM may not start at the beginning of the address space or go to its end, and that means there isn't really anywhere fixed you can put the coreboot tables. That's meant that libpayload has to be configured on a per board basis to know where to look for CBMEM. Now that we have boards that don't have fixed amounts of memory, the location of the end of RAM isn't fixed even on a per board level which means even that workaround will no longer cut it. This change makes coreboot pass the location of the coreboot tables to libpayload using r0, the first argument register. That means we'll be able to find them no matter where CBMEM is, and we can get rid of the per board search ranges. We can extend this mechanism to x86 as well, but there may be more complications and it's less necessary there. It would be a good thing to do eventually though. BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on nyan. Changed the size of memory and saw that the payload could still find the coreboot tables where before it couldn't. Built for pit, snow, and big. BRANCH=None Original-Change-Id: I7218afd999da1662b0db8172fd8125670ceac471 Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/185572 Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit ca88f39c21158b59abe3001f986207a292359cf5) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Iab14e9502b6ce7a55f0a72e190fa582f89f11a1e Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7655 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2014-02-08 15:30:49 +01:00
cache_sync_instructions();
program loading: introduce struct prog The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more complicated execution paths such as running a program on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow on patches will allow the platform to decide how to execute a particular program. Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be fixed. Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-03-20 19:00:20 +01:00
doit = prog_entry(&payload->prog);
doit(prog_entry_arg(&payload->prog));
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink