coreboot-kgpe-d16/util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c

778 lines
19 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* cbfstool, CLI utility for CBFS file manipulation
*
* Copyright (C) 2009 coresystems GmbH
* written by Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
* Copyright (C) 2012 Google, Inc.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA, 02110-1301 USA
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include "common.h"
#include "cbfs.h"
#include "cbfs_image.h"
#include "fit.h"
struct command {
const char *name;
const char *optstring;
int (*function) (void);
};
static struct param {
char *cbfs_name;
char *name;
char *filename;
char *bootblock;
char *ignore_section;
uint64_t u64val;
uint32_t type;
uint32_t baseaddress;
uint32_t baseaddress_assigned;
uint32_t loadaddress;
uint32_t headeroffset;
uint32_t headeroffset_assigned;
uint32_t entrypoint;
uint32_t size;
uint32_t alignment;
uint32_t pagesize;
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
uint32_t cbfsoffset;
uint32_t cbfsoffset_assigned;
uint32_t top_aligned;
uint32_t arch;
int fit_empty_entries;
comp_algo algo;
/* for linux payloads */
char *initrd;
char *cmdline;
} param = {
/* All variables not listed are initialized as zero. */
.arch = CBFS_ARCHITECTURE_UNKNOWN,
.algo = CBFS_COMPRESS_NONE,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
.headeroffset = ~0,
};
typedef int (*convert_buffer_t)(struct buffer *buffer, uint32_t *offset);
static int cbfs_add_integer_component(const char *cbfs_name,
const char *name,
uint64_t u64val,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
uint32_t offset,
uint32_t headeroffset) {
struct cbfs_image image;
struct buffer buffer;
int i, ret = 1;
if (!name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
if (buffer_create(&buffer, 8, name) != 0)
return 1;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
buffer.data[i] = (u64val >> i*8) & 0xff;
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, cbfs_name, headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n", cbfs_name);
buffer_delete(&buffer);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_get_entry(&image, name)) {
ERROR("'%s' already in ROM image.\n", name);
goto done;
}
if (cbfs_add_entry(&image, &buffer, name, CBFS_COMPONENT_RAW, param.baseaddress) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to add %llu into ROM image as '%s'.\n", (long long unsigned)u64val, name);
goto done;
}
if (cbfs_image_write_file(&image, cbfs_name) == 0)
ret = 0;
done:
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return ret;
}
static int cbfs_add_component(const char *cbfs_name,
const char *filename,
const char *name,
uint32_t type,
uint32_t offset,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
uint32_t headeroffset,
convert_buffer_t convert)
{
struct cbfs_image image;
struct buffer buffer;
if (!filename) {
ERROR("You need to specify -f/--filename.\n");
return 1;
}
if (!name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
if (type == 0) {
ERROR("You need to specify a valid -t/--type.\n");
return 1;
}
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, cbfs_name, headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n", cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
if (buffer_from_file(&buffer, filename) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load file '%s'.\n", filename);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (convert && convert(&buffer, &offset) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to parse file '%s'.\n", filename);
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_get_entry(&image, name)) {
ERROR("'%s' already in ROM image.\n", name);
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_add_entry(&image, &buffer, name, type, offset) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to add '%s' into ROM image.\n", filename);
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_image_write_file(&image, cbfs_name) != 0) {
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
buffer_delete(&buffer);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 0;
}
static int cbfstool_convert_mkstage(struct buffer *buffer, uint32_t *offset)
{
struct buffer output;
int ret;
ret = parse_elf_to_stage(buffer, &output, param.arch, param.algo,
offset, param.ignore_section);
if (ret != 0)
return -1;
buffer_delete(buffer);
// direct assign, no dupe.
memcpy(buffer, &output, sizeof(*buffer));
return 0;
}
static int cbfstool_convert_mkpayload(struct buffer *buffer,
unused uint32_t *offset)
{
struct buffer output;
int ret;
/* per default, try and see if payload is an ELF binary */
ret = parse_elf_to_payload(buffer, &output, param.arch, param.algo);
/* If it's not an ELF, see if it's a UEFI FV */
if (ret != 0)
ret = parse_fv_to_payload(buffer, &output, param.algo);
/* If it's neither ELF nor UEFI Fv, try bzImage */
if (ret != 0)
ret = parse_bzImage_to_payload(buffer, &output,
param.initrd, param.cmdline, param.algo);
/* Not a supported payload type */
if (ret != 0) {
ERROR("Not a supported payload type (ELF / FV).\n");
return -1;
}
buffer_delete(buffer);
// direct assign, no dupe.
memcpy(buffer, &output, sizeof(*buffer));
return 0;
}
static int cbfstool_convert_mkflatpayload(struct buffer *buffer,
unused uint32_t *offset)
{
struct buffer output;
if (parse_flat_binary_to_payload(buffer, &output,
param.loadaddress,
param.entrypoint,
param.algo) != 0) {
return -1;
}
buffer_delete(buffer);
// direct assign, no dupe.
memcpy(buffer, &output, sizeof(*buffer));
return 0;
}
static int cbfs_add(void)
{
return cbfs_add_component(param.cbfs_name,
param.filename,
param.name,
param.type,
param.baseaddress,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
param.headeroffset,
NULL);
}
static int cbfs_add_stage(void)
{
return cbfs_add_component(param.cbfs_name,
param.filename,
param.name,
CBFS_COMPONENT_STAGE,
param.baseaddress,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
param.headeroffset,
cbfstool_convert_mkstage);
}
static int cbfs_add_payload(void)
{
return cbfs_add_component(param.cbfs_name,
param.filename,
param.name,
CBFS_COMPONENT_PAYLOAD,
param.baseaddress,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
param.headeroffset,
cbfstool_convert_mkpayload);
}
static int cbfs_add_flat_binary(void)
{
if (param.loadaddress == 0) {
ERROR("You need to specify a valid "
"-l/--load-address.\n");
return 1;
}
if (param.entrypoint == 0) {
ERROR("You need to specify a valid "
"-e/--entry-point.\n");
return 1;
}
return cbfs_add_component(param.cbfs_name,
param.filename,
param.name,
CBFS_COMPONENT_PAYLOAD,
param.baseaddress,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
param.headeroffset,
cbfstool_convert_mkflatpayload);
}
static int cbfs_add_integer(void)
{
return cbfs_add_integer_component(param.cbfs_name,
param.name,
param.u64val,
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
param.baseaddress,
param.headeroffset);
}
static int cbfs_remove(void)
{
struct cbfs_image image;
if (!param.name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, param.cbfs_name,
param.headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n",
param.cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_remove_entry(&image, param.name) != 0) {
ERROR("Removing file '%s' failed.\n",
param.name);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_image_write_file(&image, param.cbfs_name) != 0) {
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 0;
}
static int cbfs_create(void)
{
struct cbfs_image image;
struct buffer bootblock;
if (param.size == 0) {
ERROR("You need to specify a valid -s/--size.\n");
return 1;
}
if (param.arch == CBFS_ARCHITECTURE_UNKNOWN) {
ERROR("You need to specify -m/--machine arch.\n");
return 1;
}
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
if (!param.bootblock) {
DEBUG("-B not given, creating image without bootblock.\n");
buffer_create(&bootblock, 0, "(dummy)");
} else if (buffer_from_file(&bootblock, param.bootblock)) {
return 1;
}
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
if (!param.alignment)
param.alignment = 64; // default CBFS entry alignment
// Set default offsets. x86, as usual, needs to be a special snowflake.
if (!param.baseaddress_assigned) {
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
if (param.arch == CBFS_ARCHITECTURE_X86) {
// Make sure there's at least enough room for rel_offset
param.baseaddress = param.size - (
bootblock.size > sizeof(int32_t) ?
bootblock.size : sizeof(int32_t));
DEBUG("x86 -> bootblock lies at end of ROM (%#x).\n",
param.baseaddress);
} else {
param.baseaddress = 0;
DEBUG("bootblock starts at address 0x0.\n");
}
}
if (!param.headeroffset_assigned) {
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
if (param.arch == CBFS_ARCHITECTURE_X86) {
param.headeroffset = param.baseaddress -
sizeof(struct cbfs_header);
DEBUG("x86 -> CBFS header before bootblock (%#x).\n",
param.headeroffset);
} else {
param.headeroffset = align_up(param.baseaddress +
bootblock.size, sizeof(uint32_t));
DEBUG("CBFS header placed behind bootblock (%#x).\n",
param.headeroffset);
}
}
if (!param.cbfsoffset_assigned) {
if (param.arch == CBFS_ARCHITECTURE_X86) {
param.cbfsoffset = 0;
DEBUG("x86 -> CBFS entries start at address 0x0.\n");
} else {
param.cbfsoffset = align_up(param.headeroffset +
sizeof(struct cbfs_header),
param.alignment);
DEBUG("CBFS entries start beind master header (%#x).\n",
param.cbfsoffset);
}
}
if (cbfs_image_create(&image,
param.arch,
param.size,
param.alignment,
&bootblock,
param.baseaddress,
param.headeroffset,
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
param.cbfsoffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to create %s.\n", param.cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
buffer_delete(&bootblock);
if (cbfs_image_write_file(&image, param.cbfs_name) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to write %s.\n", param.cbfs_name);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 0;
}
static int cbfs_locate(void)
{
struct cbfs_image image;
struct buffer buffer;
int32_t address;
if (!param.filename) {
ERROR("You need to specify -f/--filename.\n");
return 1;
}
if (!param.name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, param.cbfs_name,
param.headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Failed to load %s.\n", param.cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
if (cbfs_get_entry(&image, param.name))
WARN("'%s' already in CBFS.\n", param.name);
if (buffer_from_file(&buffer, param.filename) != 0) {
ERROR("Cannot load %s.\n", param.filename);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
address = cbfs_locate_entry(&image, param.name, buffer.size,
param.pagesize, param.alignment);
buffer_delete(&buffer);
if (address == -1) {
ERROR("'%s' can't fit in CBFS for page-size %#x, align %#x.\n",
param.name, param.pagesize, param.alignment);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 1;
}
if (param.top_aligned)
address = address - image.header->romsize;
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
printf("0x%x\n", address);
return 0;
}
static int cbfs_print(void)
{
struct cbfs_image image;
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, param.cbfs_name,
param.headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n",
param.cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
cbfs_print_directory(&image);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return 0;
}
static int cbfs_extract(void)
{
int result = 0;
struct cbfs_image image;
if (!param.filename) {
ERROR("You need to specify -f/--filename.\n");
return 1;
}
if (!param.name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, param.cbfs_name,
param.headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n",
param.cbfs_name);
result = 1;
} else if (cbfs_export_entry(&image, param.name,
param.filename) != 0) {
result = 1;
}
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return result;
}
static int cbfs_update_fit(void)
{
int ret = 0;
struct cbfs_image image;
if (!param.name) {
ERROR("You need to specify -n/--name.\n");
return 1;
}
if (param.fit_empty_entries <= 0) {
ERROR("Invalid number of fit entries "
"(-x/--empty-fits): %d\n", param.fit_empty_entries);
return 1;
}
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
if (cbfs_image_from_file(&image, param.cbfs_name,
param.headeroffset) != 0) {
ERROR("Could not load ROM image '%s'.\n",
param.cbfs_name);
return 1;
}
ret = fit_update_table(&image, param.fit_empty_entries, param.name);
if (!ret)
ret = cbfs_image_write_file(&image, param.cbfs_name);
cbfs_image_delete(&image);
return ret;
}
static const struct command commands[] = {
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
{"add", "H;f:n:t:b:vh?", cbfs_add},
{"add-payload", "H:f:n:t:c:b:vh?C:I:", cbfs_add_payload},
{"add-stage", "H:f:n:t:c:b:S:vh?", cbfs_add_stage},
{"add-flat-binary", "H:f:n:l:e:c:b:vh?", cbfs_add_flat_binary},
{"add-int", "H:i:n:b:vh?", cbfs_add_integer},
{"remove", "H:n:vh?", cbfs_remove},
{"create", "s:B:b:H:a:o:m:vh?", cbfs_create},
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
{"locate", "H:f:n:P:a:Tvh?", cbfs_locate},
{"print", "H:vh?", cbfs_print},
{"extract", "H:n:f:vh?", cbfs_extract},
{"update-fit", "H:n:x:vh?", cbfs_update_fit},
};
static struct option long_options[] = {
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
{"name", required_argument, 0, 'n' },
{"type", required_argument, 0, 't' },
{"compression", required_argument, 0, 'c' },
{"base-address", required_argument, 0, 'b' },
{"load-address", required_argument, 0, 'l' },
{"top-aligned", required_argument, 0, 'T' },
{"entry-point", required_argument, 0, 'e' },
{"size", required_argument, 0, 's' },
{"bootblock", required_argument, 0, 'B' },
{"header-offset", required_argument, 0, 'H' },
{"alignment", required_argument, 0, 'a' },
{"page-size", required_argument, 0, 'P' },
{"offset", required_argument, 0, 'o' },
{"file", required_argument, 0, 'f' },
{"int", required_argument, 0, 'i' },
{"machine", required_argument, 0, 'm' },
{"empty-fits", required_argument, 0, 'x' },
{"initrd", required_argument, 0, 'I' },
{"cmdline", required_argument, 0, 'C' },
{"ignore-sec", required_argument, 0, 'S' },
{"verbose", no_argument, 0, 'v' },
{"help", no_argument, 0, 'h' },
{NULL, 0, 0, 0 }
};
static void usage(char *name)
{
printf
("cbfstool: Management utility for CBFS formatted ROM images\n\n"
"USAGE:\n" " %s [-h]\n"
" %s FILE COMMAND [-v] [PARAMETERS]...\n\n" "OPTIONs:\n"
cbfstool: allow user to explicitly specify header location There potentially could be multiple CBFS instances present in the firmware image. cbfstool should be able to operate on any of them, not just the first one present. To accomplish that, allow all CBFS commands to accept the -H parameter (which specifies the exact CBFS header location in the image). If this parameter is specified, the image is not searched for the CBFS header, only the specified location is checked for validity, If the location is valid, it is considered to be the CBFS header, if not - the tool exits with an error status. Note, that default behavior of the tool does not change. BRANCH=storm BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938 TEST=run the following experiments: - examined an image with three CBFS instances, was able to print all of them. - built a rambi coreboot image and tried the following (cbfstool output abbreviated): $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ \od -tx4 -Ax /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom | tail -2 7ffff0 fff67de9 000000ff fff6dfe9 fffff650 800000 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff650 coreboot.rom: 8192 kB, bootblocksize 2448, romsize 8388608, offset 0x700000 alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86 Name Offset Type Size cmos_layout.bin 0x700000 cmos_layout 1164 ... (empty) 0x7ec600 null 77848 $ ./util/cbfstool/cbfstool /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom print -H 0x7ff654 E: /build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom does not have CBFS master header. E: Could not load ROM image '/build/rambi/firmware/coreboot.rom'. $ Change-Id: I64cbdc79096f3c7a113762b641305542af7bbd60 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 86b88222df6eed25bb176d653305e2e57e18b73a Original-Change-Id: I486092e222c96c65868ae7d41a9e8976ffcc93c4 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237485 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9741 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-24 00:10:12 +01:00
" -H header_offset Do not search for header, use this offset\n"
" -T Output top-aligned memory address\n"
" -v Provide verbose output\n"
" -h Display this help message\n\n"
"COMMANDs:\n"
" add -f FILE -n NAME -t TYPE [-b base-address] "
"Add a component\n"
" add-payload -f FILE -n NAME [-c compression] [-b base] "
"Add a payload to the ROM\n"
" (linux specific: [-C cmdline] [-I initrd])\n"
" add-stage -f FILE -n NAME [-c compression] [-b base] \\\n"
" [-S section-to-ignore] "
"Add a stage to the ROM\n"
" add-flat-binary -f FILE -n NAME -l load-address \\\n"
" -e entry-point [-c compression] [-b base] "
"Add a 32bit flat mode binary\n"
" add-int -i INTEGER -n NAME [-b base] "
"Add a raw 64-bit integer value\n"
" remove -n NAME "
"Remove a component\n"
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
" create -s size -m ARCH [-B bootblock] [-b bootblock offset] \\\n"
" [-o CBFS offset] [-H header offset] [-a align] "
"Create a ROM file\n"
" locate -f FILE -n NAME [-P page-size] [-a align] [-T] "
"Find a place for a file of that size\n"
" print "
"Show the contents of the ROM\n"
" extract -n NAME -f FILE "
"Extracts a raw payload from ROM\n"
" update-fit -n MICROCODE_BLOB_NAME -x EMTPY_FIT_ENTRIES\n "
"Updates the FIT table with microcode entries\n"
"\n"
"ARCHes:\n"
" arm64, arm, mips, x86\n"
"TYPEs:\n", name, name
);
print_supported_filetypes();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
size_t i;
int c;
if (argc < 3) {
usage(argv[0]);
return 1;
}
param.cbfs_name = argv[1];
char *cmd = argv[2];
optind += 2;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(commands); i++) {
if (strcmp(cmd, commands[i].name) != 0)
continue;
while (1) {
char *suffix = NULL;
int option_index = 0;
c = getopt_long(argc, argv, commands[i].optstring,
long_options, &option_index);
if (c == -1)
break;
/* filter out illegal long options */
if (strchr(commands[i].optstring, c) == NULL) {
/* TODO maybe print actual long option instead */
ERROR("%s: invalid option -- '%c'\n",
argv[0], c);
c = '?';
}
switch(c) {
case 'n':
param.name = optarg;
break;
case 't':
if (intfiletype(optarg) != ((uint64_t) - 1))
param.type = intfiletype(optarg);
else
param.type = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
if (param.type == 0)
WARN("Unknown type '%s' ignored\n",
optarg);
break;
case 'c':
if (!strncasecmp(optarg, "lzma", 5))
param.algo = CBFS_COMPRESS_LZMA;
else if (!strncasecmp(optarg, "none", 5))
param.algo = CBFS_COMPRESS_NONE;
else
WARN("Unknown compression '%s'"
" ignored.\n", optarg);
break;
case 'b':
param.baseaddress = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
// baseaddress may be zero on non-x86, so we
// need an explicit "baseaddress_assigned".
param.baseaddress = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
param.baseaddress_assigned = 1;
break;
case 'l':
param.loadaddress = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 'e':
param.entrypoint = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 's':
param.size = strtoul(optarg, &suffix, 0);
if (tolower(suffix[0])=='k') {
param.size *= 1024;
}
if (tolower(suffix[0])=='m') {
param.size *= 1024 * 1024;
}
break;
case 'B':
param.bootblock = optarg;
break;
case 'H':
param.headeroffset = strtoul(
optarg, NULL, 0);
param.headeroffset_assigned = 1;
break;
case 'a':
param.alignment = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 'P':
param.pagesize = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 'o':
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
param.cbfsoffset = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0);
param.cbfsoffset_assigned = 1;
break;
case 'f':
param.filename = optarg;
break;
case 'i':
param.u64val = strtoull(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 'T':
param.top_aligned = 1;
break;
case 'x':
param.fit_empty_entries = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0);
break;
case 'v':
verbose++;
break;
case 'm':
param.arch = string_to_arch(optarg);
break;
case 'I':
param.initrd = optarg;
break;
case 'C':
param.cmdline = optarg;
break;
case 'S':
param.ignore_section = optarg;
break;
case 'h':
case '?':
usage(argv[0]);
return 1;
default:
break;
}
}
return commands[i].function();
}
ERROR("Unknown command '%s'.\n", cmd);
usage(argv[0]);
return 1;
}