Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of the coreboot project.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2012 The ChromiumOS Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <unistd.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <getopt.h>
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <fcntl.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/stat.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/mman.h>
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <libgen.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof((a)[0]))
|
|
|
|
#define MAP_BYTES (1024*1024)
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "boot/coreboot_tables.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef uint16_t u16;
|
|
|
|
typedef uint32_t u32;
|
|
|
|
typedef uint64_t u64;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "cbmem.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "timestamp.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
#define CBMEM_VERSION "1.0"
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
/* verbose output? */
|
|
|
|
static int verbose = 0;
|
|
|
|
#define debug(x...) if(verbose) printf(x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* File handle used to access /dev/mem */
|
|
|
|
static int fd;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* calculate ip checksum (16 bit quantities) on a passed in buffer. In case
|
|
|
|
* the buffer length is odd last byte is excluded from the calculation
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static u16 ipchcksum(const void *addr, unsigned size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const u16 *p = addr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned i, n = size / 2; /* don't expect odd sized blocks */
|
|
|
|
u32 sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
|
|
|
|
sum += p[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sum = (sum >> 16) + (sum & 0xffff);
|
|
|
|
sum += (sum >> 16);
|
|
|
|
sum = ~sum & 0xffff;
|
|
|
|
return (u16) sum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
* Functions to map / unmap physical memory into virtual address space. These
|
|
|
|
* functions always maps 1MB at a time and can only map one area at once.
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
static void *mapped_virtual;
|
|
|
|
static void *map_memory(u64 physical)
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
void *v;
|
|
|
|
off_t p;
|
|
|
|
int page = getpagesize();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Mapped memory must be aligned to page size */
|
|
|
|
p = physical & ~(page - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
debug("Mapping 1MB of physical memory at 0x%zx.\n", p);
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v = mmap(NULL, MAP_BYTES, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, p);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (v == MAP_FAILED) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to mmap /dev/mem: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
strerror(errno));
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Remember what we actually mapped ... */
|
|
|
|
mapped_virtual = v;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ... but return address to the physical memory that was requested */
|
|
|
|
v += physical & (page-1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void unmap_memory(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
if (mapped_virtual == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Error unmapping memory\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
debug("Unmapping 1MB of virtual memory at %p.\n", mapped_virtual);
|
|
|
|
munmap(mapped_virtual, MAP_BYTES);
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
mapped_virtual = NULL;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
* Try finding the timestamp table and coreboot cbmem console starting from the
|
|
|
|
* passed in memory offset. Could be called recursively in case a forwarding
|
|
|
|
* entry is found.
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns pointer to a memory buffer containg the timestamp table or zero if
|
|
|
|
* none found.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct lb_cbmem_ref timestamps;
|
|
|
|
static struct lb_cbmem_ref console;
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
static struct lb_memory_range cbmem;
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int parse_cbtable(u64 address)
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
int i, found = 0;
|
|
|
|
void *buf;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debug("Looking for coreboot table at %lx\n", address);
|
|
|
|
buf = map_memory(address);
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* look at every 16 bytes within 4K of the base */
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 0x1000; i += 0x10) {
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
struct lb_header *lbh;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct lb_record* lbr_p;
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
void *lbtable;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int j;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
lbh = (struct lb_header *)(buf + i);
|
|
|
|
if (memcmp(lbh->signature, "LBIO", sizeof(lbh->signature)) ||
|
|
|
|
!lbh->header_bytes ||
|
|
|
|
ipchcksum(lbh, sizeof(*lbh))) {
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
lbtable = buf + i + lbh->header_bytes;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
if (ipchcksum(lbtable, lbh->table_bytes) !=
|
|
|
|
lbh->table_checksum) {
|
|
|
|
debug("Signature found, but wrong checksum.\n");
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
found = 1;
|
|
|
|
debug("Found!\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < lbh->table_bytes; j += lbr_p->size) {
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
/* look for the timestamp table */
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
lbr_p = (struct lb_record*) ((char *)lbtable + j);
|
|
|
|
debug(" coreboot table entry 0x%02x\n", lbr_p->tag);
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
switch (lbr_p->tag) {
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
case LB_TAG_MEMORY: {
|
|
|
|
int i = 0;
|
|
|
|
debug(" Found memory map.\n");
|
|
|
|
struct lb_memory *memory =
|
|
|
|
(struct lb_memory *)lbr_p;
|
|
|
|
while ((char *)&memory->map[i] < ((char *)lbtable
|
|
|
|
+ lbr_p->size)) {
|
|
|
|
if (memory->map[i].type == LB_MEM_TABLE) {
|
|
|
|
debug(" LB_MEM_TABLE found.\n");
|
|
|
|
/* The last one found is CBMEM */
|
|
|
|
cbmem = memory->map[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
case LB_TAG_TIMESTAMPS: {
|
2013-01-08 00:25:37 +01:00
|
|
|
debug(" Found timestamp table.\n");
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
timestamps = *(struct lb_cbmem_ref *) lbr_p;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case LB_TAG_CBMEM_CONSOLE: {
|
2013-01-08 00:25:37 +01:00
|
|
|
debug(" Found cbmem console.\n");
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
console = *(struct lb_cbmem_ref *) lbr_p;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case LB_TAG_FORWARD: {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This is a forwarding entry - repeat the
|
|
|
|
* search at the new address.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
struct lb_forward lbf_p =
|
|
|
|
*(struct lb_forward *) lbr_p;
|
2013-01-08 00:25:37 +01:00
|
|
|
debug(" Found forwarding entry.\n");
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
return parse_cbtable(lbf_p.forward);
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return found;
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* read CPU frequency from a sysfs file, return an frequency in Kilohertz as
|
|
|
|
* an int or exit on any error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
static u64 get_cpu_freq_KHz(void)
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
FILE *cpuf;
|
|
|
|
char freqs[100];
|
|
|
|
int size;
|
|
|
|
char *endp;
|
|
|
|
u64 rv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const char* freq_file =
|
|
|
|
"/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpuf = fopen(freq_file, "r");
|
|
|
|
if (!cpuf) {
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Could not open %s: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
freq_file, strerror(errno));
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(freqs, 0, sizeof(freqs));
|
|
|
|
size = fread(freqs, 1, sizeof(freqs), cpuf);
|
|
|
|
if (!size || (size == sizeof(freqs))) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Wrong number of bytes(%d) read from %s\n",
|
|
|
|
size, freq_file);
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fclose(cpuf);
|
|
|
|
rv = strtoull(freqs, &endp, 10);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (*endp == '\0' || *endp == '\n')
|
|
|
|
return rv;
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Wrong formatted value ^%s^ read from %s\n",
|
|
|
|
freqs, freq_file);
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Print an integer in 'normalized' form - with commas separating every three
|
|
|
|
* decimal orders. The 'comma' parameter indicates if a comma is needed after
|
|
|
|
* the value is printed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void print_norm(u64 v, int comma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int first_triple = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (v > 1000) {
|
|
|
|
/* print the higher order sections first */
|
|
|
|
print_norm(v / 1000, 1);
|
|
|
|
first_triple = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (first_triple)
|
|
|
|
printf("%d", (u32)(v % 1000));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
printf("%3.3d", (u32)(v % 1000));
|
|
|
|
if (comma)
|
|
|
|
printf(",");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* dump the timestamp table */
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
static void dump_timestamps(void)
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
u64 cpu_freq_MHz = get_cpu_freq_KHz() / 1000;
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
struct timestamp_table *tst_p;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (timestamps.tag != LB_TAG_TIMESTAMPS) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "No timestamps found in coreboot table.\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tst_p = (struct timestamp_table *)
|
|
|
|
map_memory((unsigned long)timestamps.cbmem_addr);
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("%d entries total:\n\n", tst_p->num_entries);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < tst_p->num_entries; i++) {
|
|
|
|
const struct timestamp_entry *tse_p = tst_p->entries + i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("%4d:", tse_p->entry_id);
|
|
|
|
print_norm(tse_p->entry_stamp / cpu_freq_MHz, 0);
|
|
|
|
if (i) {
|
|
|
|
printf(" (");
|
|
|
|
print_norm((tse_p->entry_stamp -
|
|
|
|
tse_p[-1].entry_stamp) /
|
|
|
|
cpu_freq_MHz, 0);
|
|
|
|
printf(")");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
printf("\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
/* dump the cbmem console */
|
|
|
|
static void dump_console(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
void *console_p;
|
|
|
|
char *console_c;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (console.tag != LB_TAG_CBMEM_CONSOLE) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "No console found in coreboot table.\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
console_p = map_memory((unsigned long)console.cbmem_addr);
|
|
|
|
/* The in-memory format of the console area is:
|
|
|
|
* u32 size
|
|
|
|
* u32 cursor
|
|
|
|
* char console[size]
|
|
|
|
* Hence we have to add 8 to get to the actual console string.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
size = *(uint32_t *)console_p;
|
|
|
|
console_c = malloc(size + 1);
|
|
|
|
if (!console_c) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Not enough memory for console.\n");
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(console_c, console_p + 8, size);
|
|
|
|
console_c[size] = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("%s", console_c);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(console_c);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
#define CBMEM_MAGIC 0x434f5245
|
|
|
|
#define MAX_CBMEM_ENTRIES 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct cbmem_entry {
|
|
|
|
uint32_t magic;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t id;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t base;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t size;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
static void dump_cbmem_toc(void)
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t start;
|
|
|
|
struct cbmem_entry *entries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (cbmem.type != LB_MEM_TABLE) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "No coreboot table area found!\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start = unpack_lb64(cbmem.start);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entries = (struct cbmem_entry *)map_memory(start);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("CBMEM table of contents:\n");
|
|
|
|
printf(" ID START LENGTH\n");
|
|
|
|
for (i=0; i<MAX_CBMEM_ENTRIES; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (entries[i].magic != CBMEM_MAGIC)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("%2d. ", i);
|
|
|
|
switch (entries[i].id) {
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_FREESPACE: printf("FREE SPACE "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_GDT: printf("GDT "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_ACPI: printf("ACPI "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_ACPI_GNVS: printf("ACPI GNVS "); break;
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_CBTABLE: printf("COREBOOT "); break;
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_PIRQ: printf("IRQ TABLE "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_MPTABLE: printf("SMP TABLE "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_RESUME: printf("ACPI RESUME "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_RESUME_SCRATCH: printf("ACPI SCRATCH"); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_SMBIOS: printf("SMBIOS "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_TIMESTAMP: printf("TIME STAMP "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_MRCDATA: printf("MRC DATA "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_CONSOLE: printf("CONSOLE "); break;
|
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_ELOG: printf("ELOG "); break;
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
case CBMEM_ID_COVERAGE: printf("COVERAGE "); break;
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
default: printf("%08x ",
|
|
|
|
entries[i].id); break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
printf(" 0x%08jx 0x%08jx\n", (uintmax_t)entries[i].base,
|
|
|
|
(uintmax_t)entries[i].size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
#define COVERAGE_MAGIC 0x584d4153
|
|
|
|
struct file {
|
|
|
|
uint32_t magic;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t next;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t filename;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t data;
|
|
|
|
int offset;
|
|
|
|
int len;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int mkpath(char *path, mode_t mode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert (path && *path);
|
|
|
|
char *p;
|
|
|
|
for (p = strchr(path+1, '/'); p; p = strchr(p + 1, '/')) {
|
|
|
|
*p = '\0';
|
|
|
|
if (mkdir(path, mode) == -1) {
|
|
|
|
if (errno != EEXIST) {
|
|
|
|
*p = '/';
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*p = '/';
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void dump_coverage(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i, found = 0;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t start;
|
|
|
|
struct cbmem_entry *entries;
|
|
|
|
void *coverage;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long phys_offset;
|
|
|
|
#define phys_to_virt(x) ((void *)(unsigned long)(x) + phys_offset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (cbmem.type != LB_MEM_TABLE) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "No coreboot table area found!\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start = unpack_lb64(cbmem.start);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entries = (struct cbmem_entry *)map_memory(start);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i=0; i<MAX_CBMEM_ENTRIES; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (entries[i].magic != CBMEM_MAGIC)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (entries[i].id == CBMEM_ID_COVERAGE) {
|
|
|
|
found = 1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!found) {
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "No coverage information found in"
|
|
|
|
" CBMEM area.\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start = entries[i].base;
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
/* Map coverage area */
|
|
|
|
coverage = map_memory(start);
|
|
|
|
phys_offset = (unsigned long)coverage - (unsigned long)start;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Dumping coverage data...\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct file *file = (struct file *)coverage;
|
|
|
|
while (file && file->magic == COVERAGE_MAGIC) {
|
|
|
|
FILE *f;
|
|
|
|
char *filename;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debug(" -> %s\n", (char *)phys_to_virt(file->filename));
|
|
|
|
filename = strdup((char *)phys_to_virt(file->filename));
|
|
|
|
if (mkpath(filename, 0755) == -1) {
|
|
|
|
perror("Directory for coverage data could "
|
|
|
|
"not be created");
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
f = fopen(filename, "wb");
|
|
|
|
if (!f) {
|
|
|
|
printf("Could not open %s: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
filename, strerror(errno));
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (fwrite((void *)phys_to_virt(file->data),
|
|
|
|
file->len, 1, f) != 1) {
|
|
|
|
printf("Could not write to %s: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
filename, strerror(errno));
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fclose(f);
|
|
|
|
free(filename);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (file->next)
|
|
|
|
file = (struct file *)phys_to_virt(file->next);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
file = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unmap_memory();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void print_version(void)
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
printf("cbmem v%s -- ", CBMEM_VERSION);
|
|
|
|
printf("Copyright (C) 2012 The ChromiumOS Authors. All rights reserved.\n\n");
|
|
|
|
printf(
|
|
|
|
"This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify\n"
|
|
|
|
"it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by\n"
|
|
|
|
"the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the License.\n\n"
|
|
|
|
"This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,\n"
|
|
|
|
"but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of\n"
|
|
|
|
"MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the\n"
|
|
|
|
"GNU General Public License for more details.\n\n"
|
|
|
|
"You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License\n"
|
|
|
|
"along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.\n\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
static void print_usage(const char *name)
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
printf("usage: %s [-cCltVvh?]\n", name);
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
printf("\n"
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
" -c | --console: print cbmem console\n"
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
" -C | --coverage: dump coverage information\n"
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
" -l | --list: print cbmem table of contents\n"
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
" -t | --timestamps: print timestamp information\n"
|
|
|
|
" -V | --verbose: verbose (debugging) output\n"
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
" -v | --version: print the version\n"
|
|
|
|
" -h | --help: print this help\n"
|
|
|
|
"\n");
|
|
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char** argv)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int j;
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
static const int possible_base_addresses[] = { 0, 0xf0000 };
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
int print_defaults = 1;
|
|
|
|
int print_console = 0;
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
int print_coverage = 0;
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
int print_list = 0;
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
int print_timestamps = 0;
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
int opt, option_index = 0;
|
|
|
|
static struct option long_options[] = {
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
{"console", 0, 0, 'c'},
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
{"coverage", 0, 0, 'C'},
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
{"list", 0, 0, 'l'},
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
{"timestamps", 0, 0, 't'},
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
{"verbose", 0, 0, 'V'},
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
{"version", 0, 0, 'v'},
|
|
|
|
{"help", 0, 0, 'h'},
|
|
|
|
{0, 0, 0, 0}
|
|
|
|
};
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argv, "cCltVvh?",
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
long_options, &option_index)) != EOF) {
|
|
|
|
switch (opt) {
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
case 'c':
|
|
|
|
print_console = 1;
|
|
|
|
print_defaults = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
case 'C':
|
|
|
|
print_coverage = 1;
|
|
|
|
print_defaults = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
case 'l':
|
|
|
|
print_list = 1;
|
|
|
|
print_defaults = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
case 't':
|
|
|
|
print_timestamps = 1;
|
|
|
|
print_defaults = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
case 'V':
|
|
|
|
verbose = 1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-01-03 00:43:56 +01:00
|
|
|
case 'v':
|
|
|
|
print_version();
|
|
|
|
exit(0);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 'h':
|
|
|
|
case '?':
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
print_usage(argv[0]);
|
|
|
|
exit(0);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
fd = open("/dev/mem", O_RDONLY, 0);
|
|
|
|
if (fd < 0) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to gain memory access: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
strerror(errno));
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
/* Find and parse coreboot table */
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(possible_base_addresses); j++) {
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
if (parse_cbtable(possible_base_addresses[j]))
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (print_console)
|
|
|
|
dump_console();
|
|
|
|
|
Implement GCC code coverage analysis
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-19 01:23:28 +01:00
|
|
|
if (print_coverage)
|
|
|
|
dump_coverage();
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-08 01:26:10 +01:00
|
|
|
if (print_list)
|
|
|
|
dump_cbmem_toc();
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-07 22:37:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (print_defaults || print_timestamps)
|
2013-01-03 23:30:33 +01:00
|
|
|
dump_timestamps();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close(fd);
|
Utility to dump boot timing table
Coreboot and u-boot create a table of timestamps which allows to see
the boot process performance. The util/cbmem/cbmem.py script allows to
access the table after ChromeOS boots up and display its contents on
the console. The problem is that shipping images do not include Python
interpreter, so there is no way to access the table on a production
machine.
This change introduces a utility which is a Linux app displaying the
timestamp table. Conceivably the output of this utility might be
included in one of the ChromeOS :/system sections, so it was attempted
to write this procedure 'fail safe', namely reporting errors and not
continuing processing if something goes wrong.
Including of coreboot/src .h files will allow to keep the firmware
timestamp implementation and this utility in sync in the future.
Test:
. build the utility (run 'make' while in chroot in util/cbmem)
. copy `cbmem' and 'cbmem.py' to the target
. run both utilities (limiting cbmem.py output to 25 lines or so)
. observe that the generated tables are identical (modulo rounding
up of int division, resulting in 1 ns discrepancies in some
cases)
localhost var # ./cbmem
18 entries total:
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
localhost var # ./cbmem.py | head -25
time base 4249800, total entries 18
1:62,080
2:64,569 (2,489)
3:82,520 (17,951)
4:82,695 (174)
8:84,384 (1,688)
9:131,731 (47,347)
10:131,821 (89)
30:131,849 (27)
40:132,618 (769)
50:134,594 (1,975)
60:134,729 (134)
70:363,440 (228,710)
75:363,453 (13)
80:368,165 (4,711)
90:370,018 (1,852)
99:488,217 (118,199)
1000:491,324 (3,107)
1100:760,475 (269,150)
Change-Id: I013e594d4afe323106d88e7938dd40b17760621c
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-09-28 04:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|