2019-11-19 14:44:48 +01:00
|
|
|
Upcoming release - coreboot 4.12
|
|
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
coreboot 4.12 was released on May 12th, 2020.
|
2019-11-19 14:44:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Since 4.11 there were 2692 new commits by over 190 developers and of
|
|
|
|
these, 59 contributed for the first time, which is quite an amazing
|
|
|
|
increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you to all developers who again helped made coreboot better
|
|
|
|
than ever, and a big welcome to our new contributors!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintainers
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This release saw some activity on the MAINTAINERS file, showing more
|
|
|
|
persons, teams and companies declare publicly that they intend to
|
|
|
|
take care of mainboards and subsystems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To all new maintainers, thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our documentation efforts in the code tree are picking up steam, with
|
|
|
|
some 70 commits in that general area. Everything from typo fixes to
|
|
|
|
documenting mainboard support or coreboot APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's still room to improve, but the contributions are getting more
|
|
|
|
and better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware support
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The removals due to the announced deprecations as well as the
|
|
|
|
deduplication of boards into variants skew the stats a bit, so at
|
|
|
|
a top level view this is a rare coreboot release in that it removes
|
|
|
|
more boards (51) than it adds (49).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After accounting for the variant moves the numbers in favor of more
|
|
|
|
hardware supported than the previous version. Besides a whole lot
|
|
|
|
of Chrome OS devices (again), this release features a whole bunch
|
|
|
|
of retrofits for devices originally shipping with non-coreboot OEM
|
|
|
|
firmware, but also support for devices that come with coreboot right
|
|
|
|
out of the box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For that, a shout out to System76, Protectli, Libretrend and the
|
|
|
|
Open Compute Project!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We simplified the header that comes at the top of every file:
|
|
|
|
Instead of a lengthy reference to the license any given file
|
|
|
|
is under, or even the license text itself, we opted for simple
|
|
|
|
[SPDX](https://www.spdx.org) identifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since people also handled copyright lines differently, we now opt for
|
|
|
|
collecting authors in AUTHORS and let git history tell the whole story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While at it, the content-free "This file is part of this-and-that
|
|
|
|
project" header was also dropped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Besides that, there has also been more work to sort out the headers
|
|
|
|
we include across the tree to minimize the code impacting every
|
|
|
|
compilation unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that our board-variant mechanism matured, many boards that were
|
|
|
|
individual models so far were converted into variants, making it
|
|
|
|
easier to maintain families of devices.
|
2019-11-19 14:44:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-20 23:44:25 +01:00
|
|
|
Deprecations
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 4.12 release a few features on x86 became mandatory. These are
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
relocatable ramstage, postcar stage and C\_ENVIRONMENT\_BOOTBLOCK.
|
2019-11-20 23:44:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Relocatable ramstage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocatable stages are a feature implemented only on x86, where stages
|
|
|
|
can be relocated at runtime. This is used to place ramstage in a better
|
|
|
|
location that does not collide with memory the OS or the payload tends
|
|
|
|
to use. The rationale behind making this mandatory is that you always
|
|
|
|
want cbmem to be cached so it's a good location to run ramstage from.
|
|
|
|
It avoids using lower memory altogether so the OS can make use of it
|
|
|
|
and no backing up needs to happen on S3 resume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Postcar stage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Postcar stage tearing down Cache-as-Ram is done in a separate
|
|
|
|
stage. This means that romstage has a clean program boundary and
|
|
|
|
that all variables in romstage can be accessed via their linked
|
|
|
|
addresses without runtime resolution. There is no need to link
|
|
|
|
global and static variables via the CAR\_GLOBAL macro and no need
|
|
|
|
to access them with car\_set/get\_var/ptr functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### C\_ENVIRONMENT\_BOOTBLOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historically the bootblock on x86 platforms has been compiled with
|
|
|
|
romcc. This means that the generated code only uses CPU registers
|
|
|
|
and therefore no stack. This 20K+ LOC compiler is limited and hard
|
|
|
|
to maintain and so is the code that one has to write in that
|
|
|
|
environment. A different solution is to set up Cache-as-Ram in the
|
|
|
|
bootblock and run GCC compiled code in the bootblock. The advantages
|
|
|
|
are increased flexibility and consistency with other architectures as
|
|
|
|
well as other stages: e.g. printing to console is possible and
|
|
|
|
VBOOT can run before romstage, making romstage updatable via RW FMAP
|
|
|
|
regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Platforms dropped from master
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following platforms did not implement those feature are dropped
|
|
|
|
from master to allow the master branch to move on:
|
|
|
|
- AMDFAM10
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
- all FSP1.0 platforms: BROADWELL\_DE, FSP\_BAYTRAIL, RANGELEY
|
2019-11-20 23:44:25 +01:00
|
|
|
- VIA VX900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In particular on FSP1.0 it is impossible to implement POSTCAR stage.
|
|
|
|
The reason is that FSP1.0 relocates the CAR region to the HOB before
|
|
|
|
returning to coreboot. This means that after FSP returns to coreboot
|
|
|
|
accessing variables via their original address is not possible. One
|
|
|
|
way of obtaining that behavior would be to set up Cache-as-Ram again
|
|
|
|
(but with open source code) and copy the relocated data from the HOB
|
|
|
|
there. This solution is deemed too hacky. Maybe a lesson can be
|
|
|
|
learned from this: blobs should not interfere with the execution
|
|
|
|
environment, as this makes proper integration much harder.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
### 4.11\_branch
|
2019-11-20 23:44:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given that some platforms supported by FSP1.0 are being produced and
|
|
|
|
popular, the 4.11 release was made into a branch in which further
|
|
|
|
development can happen.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-19 14:44:48 +01:00
|
|
|
Significant changes
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-26 16:12:21 +01:00
|
|
|
### SMMSTORE is now production ready
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
See [smmstore](../drivers/smmstore.md) for the documentation on
|
|
|
|
the API, but note that there will be an update to it featuring a
|
|
|
|
much-improved but incompatible API.
|
2019-11-26 16:12:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-05 14:10:45 +02:00
|
|
|
### Unit testing infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit testing of coreboot is now possible in a more structured way, with new
|
|
|
|
build subsystem and adoption of [Cmocka](https://cmocka.org/) framework. Tree
|
|
|
|
has new directory `tests/`, which comprises infrastructure and examples of unit
|
|
|
|
tests. See
|
|
|
|
[Unit testing coreboot](../technotes/2020-03-unit-testing-coreboot.md) for the
|
|
|
|
design document.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-11 23:46:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Final Notes
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your favorite new feature or supported board didn't make it to the
|
|
|
|
release notes? They're maintained collaboratively in the coreboot
|
|
|
|
tree, so when you land something noteworthy don't be shy, contribute
|
|
|
|
to the upcoming release's document in Documentation/releases!
|