GNUBoot/coreboot-kgpe-d16
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
coreboot-kgpe-d16/src/arch/arm/Makefile.inc

131 lines
5.2 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
################################################################################
##
## This file is part of the coreboot project.
##
## Copyright (C) 2012 The ChromiumOS Authors
## Copyright (C) 2012 Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
## Copyright (C) 2009-2010 coresystems GmbH
## Copyright (C) 2009 Ronald G. Minnich
##
## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
## the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
##
## This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
## but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
## MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
## GNU General Public License for more details.
##
## You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
## along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
GPLv2 notice: Unify all files to just use one space in »MA 02110-1301« In the file `COPYING` in the coreboot repository and upstream [1] just one space is used. The following command was used to convert all files. $ git grep -l 'MA 02' | xargs sed -i 's/MA 02/MA 02/' [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt Change-Id: Ic956dab2820a9e2ccb7841cab66966ba168f305f Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2490 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
2013-02-23 18:37:27 +01:00
## Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
##
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
# Take care of subdirectories
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
ARM: Add an ARMv4 architecture version. This is needed for the tegra124's bootblock and includes enough implementation to support that use. No caching is supported, although there are function prototypes and stub implementations to satisfy includes and linking. Change-Id: Ib79dde8c30eda98b3e823cba2ff6115a610bb2e8 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171401 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 221dc76b3ce4c1d73851c432333e091e1c60f0cb) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6783 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-10-01 14:20:17 +02:00
subdirs-y += armv4/ armv7/
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
# ARM specific options
###############################################################################
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM),y)
CBFSTOOL_PRE1_OPTS = -m arm -b $(CONFIG_BOOTBLOCK_ROM_OFFSET) -H $(CONFIG_CBFS_HEADER_ROM_OFFSET) -o $(CONFIG_CBFS_ROM_OFFSET)
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
CBFSTOOL_PRE_OPTS = -b 0
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
endif
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ARM),y)
stages_c = $(src)/arch/arm/stages.c
stages_o = $(obj)/arch/arm/stages.o
Revert "ARMv7: drop special handling for stages.c" This breaks booting, and in fact stages.c is always going to be special: for it to work it has to be compiled for arm only, no thumb allowed. It's probably better to leave the stages.o target in explicitly so it's clear that it has to be compiled with a particular set of flags, rather than try to remember that we must always have the default rules no break stages.c compilation. That would be a mess. I will be pushing a CL to get rid of the assembly dump, but will be a trivial fix. This reverts commit 8f4647a24bf19a96531af9905b23ae8a2fc2675a Change-Id: I5e3d8e5b991f6ccf4d49078378cd4615fb230ca0 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2554 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-02-28 17:47:00 +01:00
ARM: Add some missing dependencies on config.h to ARM's Makefile.inc. These dependencies came indirectly through kconfig.h which was included automatically with a -include option which was either part of INCLUDES or specified directly. With this change, I'm able to build for beaglebone with make -j 48. Change-Id: Ib57d0c6a755b747165b235c2328c3c30bd6dd67d Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3922 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-09-16 05:53:57 +02:00
$(stages_o): $(stages_c) $(obj)/config.h
Revert "ARMv7: drop special handling for stages.c" This breaks booting, and in fact stages.c is always going to be special: for it to work it has to be compiled for arm only, no thumb allowed. It's probably better to leave the stages.o target in explicitly so it's clear that it has to be compiled with a particular set of flags, rather than try to remember that we must always have the default rules no break stages.c compilation. That would be a mess. I will be pushing a CL to get rid of the assembly dump, but will be a trivial fix. This reverts commit 8f4647a24bf19a96531af9905b23ae8a2fc2675a Change-Id: I5e3d8e5b991f6ccf4d49078378cd4615fb230ca0 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2554 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-02-28 17:47:00 +01:00
@printf " CC $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(CC_arm) -I. $(CPPFLAGS_arm) -c -o $@ $< -marm
Revert "ARMv7: drop special handling for stages.c" This breaks booting, and in fact stages.c is always going to be special: for it to work it has to be compiled for arm only, no thumb allowed. It's probably better to leave the stages.o target in explicitly so it's clear that it has to be compiled with a particular set of flags, rather than try to remember that we must always have the default rules no break stages.c compilation. That would be a mess. I will be pushing a CL to get rid of the assembly dump, but will be a trivial fix. This reverts commit 8f4647a24bf19a96531af9905b23ae8a2fc2675a Change-Id: I5e3d8e5b991f6ccf4d49078378cd4615fb230ca0 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2554 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-02-28 17:47:00 +01:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_ARM
update CFLAGS for armv7 This updates $CFLAGS used for armv7. Most of them were just added to be consistent with what u-boot does. The important ones here are -march=armv7-a and -mthumb (to allow 16-bit Thumb instructions). I removed the hard float support because it got errors and coreboot should never use floats anyway. We're still having trouble with enums but I want to see how far it gets with this patch. Also, put the flags in a form that makes diffs easier to read. It's almost impossible otherwise. Finally, move some flags to the architecture Makefile, and rely on the fact that some are set for all architectures. Depends-On: I6f730d017391f9ec4401cdfd34931c869df10a9e Change-Id: Ia8a1ae22959933e06f7b996d1832cea40819f1ff Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2075 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-12-27 22:30:55 +01:00
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
# bootblock
###############################################################################
ARMV7 and Google/Snow: Add exception support code to the ramstage This is previously used exception code from libpayload. On startup it installs and then tests an exception handler. The test is an unaligned memory operation. Yes, we've seen what might be exceptions in the ramstage, and it makes sense to handle them. This code is identical in structure and operation to the previously committed payload exception handler, though we reserve the right to change it as circumstances require. The remaining question is whether we need it in romstage. Change-Id: I24484686c33c9757af8ba171ebae9773828fb69d Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2614 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-03-08 00:23:45 +01:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_BOOTBLOCK_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
ARM: Make it possible to use a custom bootblock implementation. Tegra needs to use a custom bootblock implementation because it starts on a coprocessor which uses ARMv4. It doesn't have the same control registers, caches, etc., and the regular bootblock gets exceptions and dies. Change-Id: Id197db2939bc840ad64244d6e2017fc5c89e0cbd Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171018 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit a66393fdd6fe68757e394b8a611e610f1938771d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6710 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2013-09-29 14:40:13 +02:00
bootblock-y += id.S
ARM: Overhaul the ARM Makefile. The ARM Makefile was copied from x86 and then modified, and as a result it was carrying a lot of baggage. On top of that, the extra complication made it inflexible, and we need a lot of flexiblity in order to support the fact that the Tegra124 starts on an ARMv4 coprocessor instead of one of the ARMv7 main CPUs. Change-Id: Ia6ddc27619bdb51e152ad0c628ad6f3037c103ce Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171017 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 512d942788336c8d52470135b43ee4e6a1c95f6c) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6709 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-09-29 12:02:55 +02:00
$(obj)/arch/arm/id.bootblock.o: $(obj)/build.h
bootblock-y += stages.c
ARMv7: flatten arch/armv7 source tree With only 19 source files it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to create sub directories in arch/armv7, especially since the files were distributed somewhat randomly. Change-Id: I029c7848e915edf1737e1c401c034837c95d179d Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3659 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-24 23:38:48 +02:00
bootblock-y += eabi_compat.c
armv7a: Enable native memcpy / memset The code has been there for quite a while but was never enabled. Change-Id: I4ec3dcbb3c03805ac5c75872614e5d394df667cf Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3675 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-29 22:12:20 +02:00
bootblock-y += memset.S
bootblock-y += memcpy.S
arm: Add and enable an arch specific version of memmove. This version is taken from arch/arm/lib/memmove.S in the Linux kernel. Change-Id: Ic875d0cf5b1cb407606530b7f465c406b134f0fa Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3763 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-07-07 23:15:22 +02:00
bootblock-y += memmove.S
armv7a: Enable native memcpy / memset The code has been there for quite a while but was never enabled. Change-Id: I4ec3dcbb3c03805ac5c75872614e5d394df667cf Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3675 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-29 22:12:20 +02:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(objcbfs)/bootblock.debug: $(src)/arch/arm/bootblock.ld $(obj)/ldoptions $$(bootblock-objs) $(obj)/config.h
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
@printf " LINK $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMPILER_LLVM_CLANG),y)
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(LD_bootblock) -m armelf_linux_eabi -static -o $@ -L$(obj) $< -T $(src)/arch/arm/bootblock.ld
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
else
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(CC_bootblock) $(CFLAGS_bootblock) -nostartfiles -include $(obj)/config.h -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(src)/arch/arm/bootblock.ld -Wl,--start-group $(bootblock-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_bootblock) -Wl,--end-group
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
endif
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_BOOTBLOCK_ARM
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
# romstage
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
ARM: Overhaul the ARM Makefile. The ARM Makefile was copied from x86 and then modified, and as a result it was carrying a lot of baggage. On top of that, the extra complication made it inflexible, and we need a lot of flexiblity in order to support the fact that the Tegra124 starts on an ARMv4 coprocessor instead of one of the ARMv7 main CPUs. Change-Id: Ia6ddc27619bdb51e152ad0c628ad6f3037c103ce Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171017 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 512d942788336c8d52470135b43ee4e6a1c95f6c) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6709 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-09-29 12:02:55 +02:00
romstage-y += stages.c
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
romstage-y += div0.c
romstage-y += eabi_compat.c
romstage-y += memset.S
romstage-y += memcpy.S
romstage-y += memmove.S
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
VBOOT_STUB_DEPS += $(obj)/arch/arm/eabi_compat.rmodules_arm.o
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(objcbfs)/romstage.debug: $$(romstage-objs) $(src)/arch/arm/romstage.ld $(obj)/ldoptions
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
@printf " LINK $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMPILER_LLVM_CLANG),y)
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(LD_romstage) -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o $@ -L$(obj) $(romstage-objs) -T $(src)/arch/arm/romstage.ld
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
else
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(CC_romstage) $(CFLAGS_romstage) -nostartfiles -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(src)/arch/arm/romstage.ld -Wl,--start-group $(romstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_romstage) -Wl,--end-group
WIP: Initial ARMv7 architecture implementation in coreboot The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250 used in the Google Snow ChromeBook. Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:15:04 +01:00
endif
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
###############################################################################
# ramstage
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RAMSTAGE_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
ARM: Overhaul the ARM Makefile. The ARM Makefile was copied from x86 and then modified, and as a result it was carrying a lot of baggage. On top of that, the extra complication made it inflexible, and we need a lot of flexiblity in order to support the fact that the Tegra124 starts on an ARMv4 coprocessor instead of one of the ARMv7 main CPUs. Change-Id: Ia6ddc27619bdb51e152ad0c628ad6f3037c103ce Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171017 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 512d942788336c8d52470135b43ee4e6a1c95f6c) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6709 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-09-29 12:02:55 +02:00
ramstage-y += stages.c
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
ramstage-y += div0.c
Set armv7 up for cpu_info to work as on x86 (so threads can work) On x86, cpu_info lives at the top of stack. Make the arm do that as well, as the threading model needs that and so will multicore support. As part of this change, make the stack size a power of 2. Also make it much smaller -- 2048 bytes is PLENTY for ram stage. Note that the small stack size is counterintuitive for rom stage. How can this work in rom stage, which needs a HUGE stack for lzma? The main use of STACK_SIZE has always been in ram stage; since 2002 or so it was to size per-core stacks (see, e.g., src/arch/x86/lib/c_start.S:.space CONFIG_MAX_CPUS*CONFIG_STACK_SIZE and, more recently, thread stacks. So, we define the STACK_TOP for rom and ram stage, but the STACK_SIZE has no real effect on the ROM stage (no hardware red zones on the stack) and hence we're ok with actually defining the "wrong" stack size. In fact, the coreboot_ram ldscript for armv7 sizes the stack by subtracting CONFIG_STACK_BOTTOM from CONFIG_STACK_TOP, so we replicate that arithmetic in bootblock.inc Observed stack usage in ramstage: BS: BS_PAYLOAD_LOAD times (us): entry 1 run 153887 exit 1 Jumping to boot code at 23104044 CPU0: stack: 02072800 - 02073000, lowest used address 020728d4, stack used: 1836 bytes entry = 23104044 Which means we do need 2K, not 1K. Change-Id: I1a21db87081597efe463095bfd33c89eba1d569f Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66135 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit f011097e9f2bfb2f4c1109d465be89a79a65ba3e) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6501 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-08-17 00:57:56 +02:00
ramstage-y += cpu.c
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
ramstage-y += eabi_compat.c
ramstage-y += boot.c
ramstage-y += tables.c
ramstage-y += memset.S
ramstage-y += memcpy.S
ramstage-y += memmove.S
ramstage-srcs += $(wildcard src/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/mainboard.c)
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(objcbfs)/ramstage.debug: $$(ramstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_ramstage) $(src)/arch/arm/ramstage.ld $(obj)/ldoptions
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
@printf " CC $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMPILER_LLVM_CLANG),y)
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(LD_ramstage) -m armelf_linux_eabi -o $@ -L$(obj) $< -T $(src)/arch/arm/ramstage.ld
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
else
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(CC_ramstage) $(CFLAGS_ramstage) -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -Wl,--start-group $(ramstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_ramstage) -Wl,--end-group -T $(src)/arch/arm/ramstage.ld
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
endif
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
$(objgenerated)/ramstage.o: $(stages_o) $$(ramstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_ramstage)
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
@printf " CC $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMPILER_LLVM_CLANG),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
$(LD_ramstage) -m -m armelf_linux_eabi -r -o $@ --wrap __divdi3 --wrap __udivdi3 --wrap __moddi3 --wrap __umoddi3 --wrap __uidiv --start-group $(ramstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_ramstage) --end-group
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
else
build: separate CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS There are a couple of places where CPPFLAGS are pasted into CFLAGS, eliminate them. Change-Id: Ic7f568cf87a7d9c5c52e2942032a867161036bd7 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5765 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-05-17 14:00:12 +02:00
$(CC_ramstage) $(CFLAGS_ramstage) $(CPPFLAGS_ramstage) -nostdlib -r -o $@ -Wl,--start-group $(stages_o) $(ramstage-objs) $(LIBGCC_FILE_NAME_ramstage) -Wl,--end-group
Move redundant Makefile rules from arch to top level. Remove all the common Makefile rules like coreboot.pre, coreboot.pre1 and others from arch level Makefile.inc to top level Makefile.inc. Also, organize Makefile.inc at arch level into per-stage rules and variables. Change-Id: I7dc5b2d31c959b55bb92d9c7811427c4dada1db5 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5571 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 01:33:22 +02:00
endif
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_RAMSTAGE_ARM
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink