GNUBoot
/
coreboot-kgpe-d16
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactor K8 rev F DDR2 CL timing retrieval. 

This will allow usage of compatible DIMMS in a dual channel setup
instead of requiring the DIMMS to be identical.

Code impact is minimal because a large chunk of code has been moved into
a separate function with almost no changes.

Tested, yields identical results and identical logs.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3866 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This commit is contained in:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 2009-01-16 03:03:40 +00:00
parent abcddcd392
commit 1d72e10bb4
1 changed files with 96 additions and 80 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

172
src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c
View File

@ -1702,6 +1702,96 @@ static unsigned convert_to_linear(unsigned value)
return value;
}
static const uint8_t latency_indicies[] = { 25, 23, 9 };
int find_optimum_spd_latency(u32 spd_device, unsigned *min_latency, unsigned *min_cycle_time)
{
int new_cycle_time, new_latency;
int index;
int latencies;
int latency;
/* First find the supported CAS latencies
* Byte 18 for DDR SDRAM is interpreted:
* bit 3 == CAS Latency = 3
* bit 4 == CAS Latency = 4
* bit 5 == CAS Latency = 5
* bit 6 == CAS Latency = 6
*/
new_cycle_time = 0x500;
new_latency = 6;
latencies = spd_read_byte(spd_device, SPD_CAS_LAT);
if (latencies <= 0)
return 1;
printk_raminit("\tlatencies: %08x\n", latencies);
/* Compute the lowest cas latency which can be expressed in this
* particular SPD EEPROM. You can store at most settings for 3
* contiguous CAS latencies, so by taking the highest CAS
* latency maked as supported in the SPD and subtracting 2 you
* get the lowest expressable CAS latency. That latency is not
* necessarily supported, but a (maybe invalid) entry exists
* for it.
*/
latency = log2(latencies) - 2;
/* Loop through and find a fast clock with a low latency */
for (index = 0; index < 3; index++, latency++) {
int value;
if ((latency < 3) || (latency > 6) ||
(!(latencies & (1 << latency)))) {
continue;
}
value = spd_read_byte(spd_device, latency_indicies[index]);
if (value < 0) {
return -1;
}
printk_raminit("\tindex: %08x\n", index);
printk_raminit("\t\tlatency: %08x\n", latency);
printk_raminit("\t\tvalue1: %08x\n", value);
value = convert_to_linear(value);
printk_raminit("\t\tvalue2: %08x\n", value);
/* Only increase the latency if we decrease the clock */
if (value >= *min_cycle_time ) {
if (value < new_cycle_time) {
new_cycle_time = value;
new_latency = latency;
} else if (value == new_cycle_time) {
if (new_latency > latency) {
new_latency = latency;
}
}
}
printk_raminit("\t\tnew_cycle_time: %08x\n", new_cycle_time);
printk_raminit("\t\tnew_latency: %08x\n", new_latency);
}
if (new_latency > 6){
return 1;
}
/* Does min_latency need to be increased? */
if (new_cycle_time > *min_cycle_time) {
*min_cycle_time = new_cycle_time;
}
/* Does min_cycle_time need to be increased? */
if (new_latency > *min_latency) {
*min_latency = new_latency;
}
printk_raminit("2 min_cycle_time: %08x\n", *min_cycle_time);
printk_raminit("2 min_latency: %08x\n", *min_latency);
return 0;
}
static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *ctrl, struct mem_info *meminfo)
{
/* Compute the minimum cycle time for these dimms */
@ -1710,8 +1800,6 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
int i;
uint32_t value;
static const uint8_t latency_indicies[] = { 25, 23, 9 };
static const uint16_t min_cycle_times[] = { // use full speed to compare
[NBCAP_MEMCLK_NOLIMIT] = 0x250, /*2.5ns */
[NBCAP_MEMCLK_333MHZ] = 0x300, /* 3.0ns */
@ -1735,10 +1823,6 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
* by both the memory controller and the dimms.
*/
for (i = 0; i < DIMM_SOCKETS; i++) {
int new_cycle_time, new_latency;
int index;
int latencies;
int latency;
u32 spd_device = ctrl->channel0[i];
printk_raminit("1.1 dimm_mask: %08x\n", meminfo->dimm_mask);
@ -1750,83 +1834,15 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
}
}
/* First find the supported CAS latencies
* Byte 18 for DDR SDRAM is interpreted:
* bit 3 == CAS Latency = 3
* bit 4 == CAS Latency = 4
* bit 5 == CAS Latency = 5
* bit 6 == CAS Latency = 6
*/
new_cycle_time = 0x500;
new_latency = 6;
latencies = spd_read_byte(spd_device, SPD_CAS_LAT);
if (latencies <= 0) continue;
printk_raminit("i: %08x\n",i);
printk_raminit("\tlatencies: %08x\n", latencies);
/* Compute the lowest cas latency which can be expressed in this
* particular SPD EEPROM. You can store at most settings for 3
* contiguous CAS latencies, so by taking the highest CAS
* latency maked as supported in the SPD and subtracting 2 you
* get the lowest expressable CAS latency. That latency is not
* necessarily supported, but a (maybe invalid) entry exists
* for it.
*/
latency = log2(latencies) - 2;
/* Loop through and find a fast clock with a low latency */
for (index = 0; index < 3; index++, latency++) {
int value;
if ((latency < 3) || (latency > 6) ||
(!(latencies & (1 << latency)))) {
continue;
}
value = spd_read_byte(spd_device, latency_indicies[index]);
if (value < 0) {
switch (find_optimum_spd_latency(spd_device, &min_latency, &min_cycle_time)) {
case -1:
goto hw_error;
}
printk_raminit("\tindex: %08x\n", index);
printk_raminit("\t\tlatency: %08x\n", latency);
printk_raminit("\t\tvalue1: %08x\n", value);
value = convert_to_linear(value);
printk_raminit("\t\tvalue2: %08x\n", value);
/* Only increase the latency if we decrease the clock */
if (value >= min_cycle_time ) {
if (value < new_cycle_time) {
new_cycle_time = value;
new_latency = latency;
} else if (value == new_cycle_time) {
if (new_latency > latency) {
new_latency = latency;
}
}
}
printk_raminit("\t\tnew_cycle_time: %08x\n", new_cycle_time);
printk_raminit("\t\tnew_latency: %08x\n", new_latency);
}
if (new_latency > 6){
break;
case 1:
continue;
}
/* Does min_latency need to be increased? */
if (new_cycle_time > min_cycle_time) {
min_cycle_time = new_cycle_time;
}
/* Does min_cycle_time need to be increased? */
if (new_latency > min_latency) {
min_latency = new_latency;
}
printk_raminit("2 min_cycle_time: %08x\n", min_cycle_time);
printk_raminit("2 min_latency: %08x\n", min_latency);
}
/* Make a second pass through the dimms and disable
* any that cannot support the selected memclk and cas latency.