intel/e7505: Remove ROMCC workaround

Choose codepath as if ROMCC_IF_BUG_FIXED was set.

Change-Id: I74b4fe4a915b70f63ea018035381b64f53af3c7f
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26771
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
Kyösti Mälkki 2018-06-02 18:38:04 +03:00
parent 730df3cc43
commit 58d6ff1330
1 changed files with 3 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -416,19 +416,8 @@ static struct dimm_size sdram_spd_get_width(uint16_t dimm_socket_address)
spd_read_byte(dimm_socket_address, SPD_NUM_DIMM_BANKS);
die_on_spd_error(value);
#ifdef ROMCC_IF_BUG_FIXED
if (value == 2)
width.side2 = width.side1;
#else
switch (value) {
case 2:
width.side2 = width.side1;
break;
default:
break;
}
#endif
}
return width;
@ -640,25 +629,12 @@ static uint8_t spd_get_supported_dimms(const struct mem_controller *ctrl)
}
#endif /* VALIDATE_DIMM_COMPATIBILITY */
// Code around ROMCC bug in optimization of "if" statements
#ifdef ROMCC_IF_BUG_FIXED
if (bDualChannel) {
// Made it through all the checks, this DIMM pair is usable
dimm_mask |= ((1 << i) | (1 << (MAX_DIMM_SOCKETS_PER_CHANNEL + i)));
// This DIMM pair is usable
dimm_mask |= 1 << i;
dimm_mask |= 1 << (MAX_DIMM_SOCKETS_PER_CHANNEL + i);
} else
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Skipping un-matched DIMMs - only dual-channel operation supported\n");
#else
switch (bDualChannel) {
case 0:
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Skipping un-matched DIMMs - only dual-channel operation supported\n");
break;
default:
// Made it through all the checks, this DIMM pair is usable
dimm_mask |= (1 << i) | (1 << (MAX_DIMM_SOCKETS_PER_CHANNEL + i));
break;
}
#endif
}
return dimm_mask;