The new resource allocator helped me find a bug in SB600 diagnostics.

The SB600 SATA code printed that two BARs had the same address because
it didn't mask the correct number of bits in the BAR.
Functionality was not affected, but the debug output was incorrect.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4591 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This commit is contained in:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 2009-08-27 04:30:47 +00:00
parent 0d0ede5f13
commit 5a5b8f5ba9
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static void sata_init(struct device *dev)
/* get base addresss */
sata_bar5 = (u8 *) (pci_read_config32(dev, 0x24) & ~0x3FF);
sata_bar0 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x10) & ~0x7;
sata_bar1 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x14) & ~0x7;
sata_bar1 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x14) & ~0x3;
sata_bar2 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x18) & ~0x7;
sata_bar3 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x1C) & ~0x7;
sata_bar4 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x20) & ~0x7;
sata_bar3 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x1C) & ~0x3;
sata_bar4 = pci_read_config16(dev, 0x20) & ~0xf;
printk_spew("sata_bar0=%x\n", sata_bar0); /* 3030 */
printk_spew("sata_bar1=%x\n", sata_bar1); /* 3070 */