spi: Remove out of date comment and reorder flash table

What is described by the comment has already been fixed in f0d038f4
(flash: use two bytes of device ID to identify stmicro chips).
This also means that STM_ID_N25Q128 doesn't have to be at the top of
stmicro_spi_flash_table anymore.

TEST=Untested, due to lack of hardware

Change-Id: I7a9e9a0cdfdb1cf34e914e186fc6957c1d9b5ca6
Signed-off-by: David Imhoff <dimhoff_devel@xs4all.nl>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10068
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
This commit is contained in:
David Imhoff 2015-05-03 14:06:21 +02:00 committed by Patrick Georgi
parent 8d4377b56d
commit 7249572b80
1 changed files with 8 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -60,11 +60,6 @@
#define STM_ID_N25Q256A 0xba19
#define STM_ID_N25Q128 0xbb18
/* Some SPI flash share the same .idcode1 (idcode[2]). To handle this without
* (possibly) breaking existing implementations, add the new device at the top
* of the flash table array and set its .idcode1 = STM_ID_USE_ALT_ID. The .id
* is then (idcode[1] << 8 | idcode[2]).
*/
struct stmicro_spi_flash_params {
u16 device_id;
u8 op_erase;
@ -87,14 +82,6 @@ static inline struct stmicro_spi_flash *to_stmicro_spi_flash(struct spi_flash
}
static const struct stmicro_spi_flash_params stmicro_spi_flash_table[] = {
{
.device_id = STM_ID_N25Q128,
.op_erase = CMD_M25PXX_SSE,
.page_size = 256,
.pages_per_sector = 16,
.nr_sectors = 4096,
.name = "N25Q128",
},
{
.device_id = STM_ID_M25P10,
.op_erase = CMD_M25PXX_SE,
@ -159,6 +146,14 @@ static const struct stmicro_spi_flash_params stmicro_spi_flash_table[] = {
.nr_sectors = 64,
.name = "M25P128",
},
{
.device_id = STM_ID_N25Q128,
.op_erase = CMD_M25PXX_SSE,
.page_size = 256,
.pages_per_sector = 16,
.nr_sectors = 4096,
.name = "N25Q128",
},
{
.device_id = STM_ID_N25Q256A,
.page_size = 256,