fix inconsistent user interface naming. don't show compile paths to users

during bootup (trivial)

Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>



git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3875 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Reinauer 2009-01-20 19:21:47 +00:00 committed by Stefan Reinauer
parent 26d431a616
commit 94f17773ef
1 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ static void check_pirq_routing_table(struct irq_routing_table *rt)
uint8_t sum=0;
int i;
printk_info("Checking IRQ routing table consistency...\n");
printk_info("Checking Interrupt Routing Table consistency...\n");
#if defined(IRQ_SLOT_COUNT)
if (sizeof(struct irq_routing_table) != rt->size) {
printk_warning("Inconsistent IRQ routing table size (0x%x/0x%x)\n",
printk_warning("Inconsistent Interrupt Routing Table size (0x%x/0x%x).\n",
sizeof(struct irq_routing_table),
rt->size
);
@ -25,24 +25,21 @@ static void check_pirq_routing_table(struct irq_routing_table *rt)
for (i = 0; i < rt->size; i++)
sum += addr[i];
printk_debug("%s() - irq_routing_table located at: 0x%p\n",
printk_debug("%s(): Interrupt Routing Table located at 0x%p.\n",
__FUNCTION__, addr);
sum = rt->checksum - sum;
if (sum != rt->checksum) {
printk_warning("%s:%6d:%s() - "
"checksum is: 0x%02x but should be: 0x%02x\n",
__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, rt->checksum, sum);
printk_warning("Interrupt Routing Table checksum is: 0x%02x but should be: 0x%02x.\n",
rt->checksum, sum);
rt->checksum = sum;
}
if (rt->signature != PIRQ_SIGNATURE || rt->version != PIRQ_VERSION ||
rt->size % 16 ) {
printk_warning("%s:%6d:%s() - "
"Interrupt Routing Table not valid\n",
__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__);
printk_warning("Interrupt Routing Table not valid.\n");
return;
}
@ -50,10 +47,13 @@ static void check_pirq_routing_table(struct irq_routing_table *rt)
for (i=0; i<rt->size; i++)
sum += addr[i];
/* We're manually fixing the checksum above. This warning can probably
* never happen because if the target location is read-only this
* function would have bailed out earlier.
*/
if (sum) {
printk_warning("%s:%6d:%s() - "
"checksum error in irq routing table\n",
__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__);
printk_warning("Checksum error in Interrupt Routing Table "
"could not be fixed.\n");
}
printk_info("done.\n");
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int verify_copy_pirq_routing_table(unsigned long addr)
rt_curr = (uint8_t*)addr;
rt_orig = (uint8_t*)&intel_irq_routing_table;
printk_info("Verifing copy of IRQ routing tables at 0x%x...", addr);
printk_info("Verifing copy of Interrupt Routing Table at 0x%08x... ", addr);
for (i = 0; i < intel_irq_routing_table.size; i++) {
if (*(rt_curr + i) != *(rt_orig + i)) {
printk_info("failed\n");
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ unsigned long copy_pirq_routing_table(unsigned long addr)
addr &= ~15;
/* This table must be betweeen 0xf0000 & 0x100000 */
printk_info("Copying IRQ routing tables to 0x%x...", addr);
printk_info("Copying Interrupt Routing Table to 0x%08x... ", addr);
memcpy((void *)addr, &intel_irq_routing_table, intel_irq_routing_table.size);
printk_info("done.\n");
verify_copy_pirq_routing_table(addr);
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void pirq_routing_irqs(unsigned long addr)
/* Set PCI IRQs. */
for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
printk_debug("PIR Entry %d Dev/Fn: %X Slot: %d\n", i,
printk_debug("PIRQ Entry %d Dev/Fn: %X Slot: %d\n", i,
pirq_tbl->slots[i].devfn >> 3, pirq_tbl->slots[i].slot);
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {