mb/google/zork/variants/dalboz: Use HS200 for eMMC
Earlier versions of Dalboz did not correctly handle HS400. One fix was to add stitching vias, but these boards did not have them. b/156539551 Another possible fix is to add tuning parameters including drive strength, but that is still a WIP. b/158959725 This should correct OS load failures in the meantime by running the bus slower. BUG=b:158845662 TEST=build, flash, boot sku 0x5a80000c to OS BRANCH=None Signed-off-by: Eric Peers <epeers@google.com> Change-Id: Ia3e7a641bde04c5a7be29bf91c38dd8c110ed17a Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43572 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
77b89c8b18
commit
be2d6541b9
|
@ -127,9 +127,21 @@ void variant_devtree_update(void)
|
|||
cfg = config_of_soc();
|
||||
|
||||
if (sku_has_emmc()) {
|
||||
if (sku_id() == 0x5A800003)
|
||||
/* rev0 boards have issues with HS400 */
|
||||
if ((sku_id() == 0x5A800003) || (sku_id() == 0x5A80000C)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* rev0 and rev1 boards have issues with HS400
|
||||
*
|
||||
* There is a tuning fix with ES which shows promise
|
||||
* for some boards, and a HW fix with stitching vias.
|
||||
* There were also concerns that these boards did not
|
||||
* have good margins for certain skus.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* But these original boards have none of these fixes.
|
||||
* So we keep the speed low here, with the intent that
|
||||
* other variants implement these corrections.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cfg->sd_emmc_config = SD_EMMC_EMMC_HS200;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cfg->sd_emmc_config = SD_EMMC_DISABLE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue