sb/amd/sb{700,800}: Clean up index manipulations

It looks like in days gone by that these switches were once parts of
loops that incremented 'index' as they went along. However, we don't
have any loops anymore, so remove the needless increments and streamline
the rest of the assignments.

Change-Id: Iaabee984333c273af7810f9c11ed26bbb2a995d1
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Found-by: scan-build 8.0.0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Garber 2019-06-24 18:32:03 -06:00 committed by Martin Roth
parent 464f4d6ee2
commit c22ebc9339
2 changed files with 8 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void sb7xx_51xx_enable(struct device *dev)
{ {
struct device *sm_dev = NULL; struct device *sm_dev = NULL;
struct device *bus_dev = NULL; struct device *bus_dev = NULL;
int index = -1; int index;
u32 deviceid; u32 deviceid;
u32 vendorid; u32 vendorid;
@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ void sb7xx_51xx_enable(struct device *dev)
index = 8; index = 8;
set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0xac, 1 << index, set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0xac, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 3;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 0):
case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 1): case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 1):
@ -179,7 +178,6 @@ void sb7xx_51xx_enable(struct device *dev)
index = dev->path.pci.devfn & 3; index = dev->path.pci.devfn & 3;
set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index, set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 2;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x13, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x13, 0):
case PCI_DEVFN(0x13, 1): case PCI_DEVFN(0x13, 1):
@ -187,34 +185,27 @@ void sb7xx_51xx_enable(struct device *dev)
index = (dev->path.pci.devfn & 3) + 4; index = (dev->path.pci.devfn & 3) + 4;
set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index, set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 2;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 5): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 5):
index = 7; index = 7;
set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index, set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x68, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 2;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 0):
index = 0;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 1): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 1):
index = 1;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 2): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 2):
index = 3; index = 3;
set_pmio_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x59, 1 << index, set_pmio_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x59, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 4;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 3): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 3):
index = 20; index = 20;
set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x64, 1 << index, set_sm_enable_bits(sm_dev, 0x64, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 1;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 4): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 4):
index = 4;
break; break;
default: default:
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "unknown dev: %s deviceid=%4x\n", dev_path(dev), printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "unknown dev: %s deviceid=%4x\n", dev_path(dev),

View File

@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
{ {
struct device *sm_dev = NULL; struct device *sm_dev = NULL;
struct device *bus_dev = NULL; struct device *bus_dev = NULL;
int index = -1; int index;
u32 deviceid; u32 deviceid;
u32 vendorid; u32 vendorid;
@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
switch (dev->path.pci.devfn - (devfn - (0x14 << 3))) { switch (dev->path.pci.devfn - (devfn - (0x14 << 3))) {
case PCI_DEVFN(0x11, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x11, 0):
index = 8; index = 0;
set_pmio_enable_bits(0xDA, 1 << 0, set_pmio_enable_bits(0xDA, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << 0); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
/* Set the device ID of SATA as 0x4390 to reduce the confusing. */ /* Set the device ID of SATA as 0x4390 to reduce the confusing. */
dword = pci_read_config32(dev, 0x40); dword = pci_read_config32(dev, 0x40);
dword |= 1 << 0; dword |= 1 << 0;
@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
pci_write_config16(dev, 0x2, 0x4390); pci_write_config16(dev, 0x2, 0x4390);
dword &= ~1; dword &= ~1;
pci_write_config32(dev, 0x40, dword);//for (;;); pci_write_config32(dev, 0x40, dword);//for (;;);
index += 32 * 3;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 0):
case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 2): case PCI_DEVFN(0x12, 2):
@ -318,15 +317,13 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
index = (dev->path.pci.devfn & 0x3) / 2 + 2; index = (dev->path.pci.devfn & 0x3) / 2 + 2;
set_pmio_enable_bits(0xEF, 1 << index, set_pmio_enable_bits(0xEF, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 2;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 0):
index = 0;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 1): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 1):
index = 1; index = 3;
set_pmio_enable_bits(0xDA, 1 << 3, set_pmio_enable_bits(0xDA, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 0 : 1) << 3); (dev->enabled ? 0 : 1) << index);
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 2): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 2):
index = 0; index = 0;
@ -337,7 +334,6 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
index = 0; index = 0;
set_pmio_enable_bits(0xEC, 1 << index, set_pmio_enable_bits(0xEC, 1 << index,
(dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index); (dev->enabled ? 1 : 0) << index);
index += 32 * 1;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 4): case PCI_DEVFN(0x14, 4):
index = 0; index = 0;
@ -356,7 +352,6 @@ void sb800_enable(struct device *dev)
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 0): case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 0):
set_sb800_gpp(dev); set_sb800_gpp(dev);
index = 4;
break; break;
case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 1): case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 1):
case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 2): case PCI_DEVFN(0x15, 2):