libpayload: Don't declare the loop counter within the for loop

'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode

I didn't realize we don't enable 14 year old features when building
libpayload, and I must have accidentally not rebuilt everything when making my
final tweaks to my earlier change.

Change-Id: I6caeeffad177b6d61fa30175f767e85084c061f4
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2718
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
This commit is contained in:
Gabe Black 2013-03-02 03:32:19 -08:00 committed by Stefan Reinauer
parent 0f5a3fc367
commit cc86e63e83
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -45,11 +45,12 @@ void exception_fiq(uint32_t *);
static void print_regs(uint32_t *regs) static void print_regs(uint32_t *regs)
{ {
int i;
/* Don't print the link register and stack pointer since we don't have their /* Don't print the link register and stack pointer since we don't have their
* actual value. They are hidden by the 'shadow' registers provided * actual value. They are hidden by the 'shadow' registers provided
* by the trap hardware. * by the trap hardware.
*/ */
for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++) { for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
if (i == 15) if (i == 15)
printf("PC"); printf("PC");
else if (i == 14) else if (i == 14)