We mostly discourage typedefs for structs. Hide
smm_save_state_area_t in the single file that still
uses it.
Change-Id: I163322deab58126cc66d416987eaf7dca9ce8220
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Any platform should need just one of these.
Change-Id: Ia0ff8eff152cbd3d82e8b372ec662d3737078d35
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34820
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The only platform-specific difference in mtk_dsi_phy_clk_setting is how
to configure MIPI TX because those registers (and logic) are quite
different across different SOCs.
The calculation of data rate is actually the same so we should isolate
it and move to common, and rename mtk_dsi_phy_clk_setting to a better
name as mtk_dsi_configure_mipi_tx.
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=make -j # board = oak and boots
Change-Id: I894dc2c4c053267debf5a58313b2bb489bcf5f3a
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34784
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
The 'bpp' was referred to both 'bits per pixel' and 'bytes per pixel' in
MTK DSI driver and should be corrected. By this change we now always
consider 'bpp' as 'bits per pixel', and rename the variables for other
cases.
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=make -j # board = oak and boots
Change-Id: Ibd405220b73859e5592c68f498af07eef8d7edbc
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34770
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The DSI initialization is almost the same for 8173 and 8183, so we want
to move most of common functions into common/dsi.c.
The major board-specific functions left are:
- reset (controller register has different format)
- pin_drv_ctrl (8183 does not need this)
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=make -j # board=oak (mt8173)
Change-Id: I8d4369a3c84db551287a9c9d1b22f552c5f7518d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34769
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
SiFive's ZSBL has initialized flash, but only 16MB of space is available.
1. add code for spi
2. add code to map flash to memory spaces
Change-Id: I106688c65ac7dd70be7479dc4691797b700682d9
Signed-off-by: Xiang Wang <merle@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33055
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Do this for consistency with remaining cpu/intel sources.
Also wipe out some spurious includes.
Change-Id: I1adde58966eae9205703b87e7aa17c50e5791a85
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34807
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
It was originally inverse of romcc-built romstages on x86,
and is currently always true on x86.
Change-Id: I65fa6b3ce8a86781724bbf08f5eadee4112667c4
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34806
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
It is easier to track CAR_GLOBAL_MIGRATION which is
the approach to be deprecated with the next release.
This change enforces new policy; POSTCAR_STAGE=y is
not allowed together with CAR_GLOBAL_MIGRATION=y.
Change-Id: I0dbad6a14e68bf566ac0f151dc8ea259e5ae2250
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34804
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Almost all platforms force it on. Make it enabled by
default but under user control to optionally disable it.
Change-Id: I6b0f19c8bfd6ffed93023d57a1d28ca6acc06835
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34803
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Build error on missing vb2ex_printf() in bootblock stage
Add the file vboot_logic.c which contains the missing vb2ex_printf().
BUG=N/A
TEST=Boot Linux 4.20 and verify logging on Facebook FBG-1701
Change-Id: I3f649f3faf1e812d592e4981bc75698e2cad1cc8
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34666
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao <lance.zhao@gmail.com>
The Kohaku V24 schematic adds two additional temperature sensors
to the EC. Add these to the DPTF tables.
Cq-Depend: chromium:1742914
BRANCH=none
BUG=b:138578073
TEST=Rebuild EC and BIOS, look for new thermal sensors in kernel.
1. Build EC
``cd ~/trunk/src/platform/ec``
``make -j BOARD=kohaku``
2. Program EC
``./util/flash_ec --board=kohaku``
3. Reboot device
4. Rebuild BIOS
``cd ~/trunk/src/third_party/coreboot``
``FEATURES="noclean" FW_NAME=kohaku emerge-hatch chromeos-ec depthcharge
vboot_reference libpayload coreboot-private-files intel-cmlfsp
coreboot-private-files-hatch coreboot chromeos-bootimage``
5. Use flashrom to program the BIOS
6. Reboot device
7. Log into the root console (ctrl-alt-F2 or servo)
8. Example thermal sensor information
``grep . /sys/class/thermal/t*/type``
Look for "TSR0" through "TSR3" in the output.
Change-Id: Ib8f38beae6392855927ce1249c229d7a114c72b2
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34765
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Oops, I missed this in the last CL.
The pin needs to be configured as owned by GPIO, so that the kernel
driver can bind it with an IRQ.
BUG=b:139165490
TEST=Ensure kernel nastygram about inability to claim the IRQ is gone
Change-Id: I26c08d75d8b4e3b834db6e90868239899605fa5b
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34815
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
In general, third party code (such as vboot) doesn't know what the
underlying types are for the integers in <stdint.h>, so these macros are
useful for portably printing them. Of these definitions, coreboot so far
has only used PRIu64 (in one place), which isn't needed anymore since we
know what the underlying type of a u64 is.
Change-Id: I9e3a300f9b1c38e4831b030ff8af3fed2fa60f14
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
HDA is not configured.
Enable SOC_INTEL_COMMON_BLOCK_HDA_VERB to configure the HDA using
cim_verb_data[] table.
BUG=N/A
TEST=Boot Embedded Linux 4.20 on Facebook FBG-1701
Change-Id: I9bb542091ad200833894431f5b840f48dd388173
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34655
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The <inttypes.h> header currently does nothing but include the
definitions from <stdint.h>, so let's #include that directly instead.
Change-Id: I9d83ad37d0d7300a093001596ce3f0b3830c5701
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34800
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Change-Id: Id8fa880357124b620bde8884949bd8ffff7d0762
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34450
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change the stoneyridge definitions into picasso. The named 0 and 1
buses are controlled by the PSP and not directly accessible by host
firmware. I2C4 operates only in slave mode so is not added to to
the bus clear-after-reset sequence.
The I2C controller is fundamentally the same as on Stoney Ridge so
the ability to clear a potentially jammed bus is still required.
Program Picasso's new pad control registers in the MISC AcpiMmio
space according to the recommended settings.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ibbc5504ebc36654e28c79fe3ae17cc0d9255118f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33763
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Change the Stoney Ridge ID to Picasso. Rename family 15h. Get the
number of cores/threads from CPUID as all D18 registers are new.
Change-Id: I44c45db637897f6caf320032c9f79a3a1ab4d6c9
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34421
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Picasso has only a single 48M output. Simplify the setup function.
Note that while the feature is similar to older products, the register
definition and Enable bit has changed.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Iebaf5219fdcd3145a4faf906f656a7fbdc7e0c36
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33768
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Remove the Family 15h device. It's not in Family 17h documentation
and isn't detectable with HDT.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ifa9c06f78f39a3ec3b555d4ecc542172cd44a0b6
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33990
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Remove the scratch register indicators. Per AMD, AGESA no longer
uses these. Use a new IO register to determine whether a warm
reset should occur.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I0ff7935004b3d1ac5204d3ef575cfa98116a57fa
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33989
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Make the definitions match Picasso's definitions. Add/remove pins
that differ from stoneyridge, update GEVENTs for the FCH mapping.
Change-Id: I59f958151f27ed4ca0eb1a87ade6102eec1e5061
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33761
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
One case slipped past the review and rebase of 733c28fa42
(soc/intel/{cnl,icl}: Use new power-failure-state API).
Change-Id: Id01df30d10e202e9672bf5be799a84f4f202fe24
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34812
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Get rid of this function and its dangerous, weak implementation.
Instead, call pmc_set_power_failure_state() directly from the SMI
handler.
Change-Id: I0718afc5db66447c93289643f9097a4257b10934
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34727
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Needed some Makefile changes to be able to compile for SMM.
Change-Id: Ibf218b90088a45349c54f4b881e895bb852e88bb
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31352
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
pmc_soc_restore_power_failure() is only called from SMM, so add
`pmc.c` to the `smm` class. Once all platforms moved to the new
API, it can be implemented in a central place, avoiding the weak-
function trap.
Change-Id: Ib13eac00002232d4377f683ad92b04a0907529f3
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34726
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Also move pmc_soc_restore_power_failure() which was guarded twice to
not be included in SMM, where the only call lives. Once all platforms
moved to the new API, it can be implemented in a central place, avoi-
ding the weak-function trap.
Change-Id: Ie72753764ecd876e6cb999fa0074d1114ae5efcf
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34725
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This is a consolidation of the respective feature in `soc/intel/*lake/`,
including additional support for MAINBOARD_POWER_STATE_PREVIOUS.
For the latter, firmware has to keep track of the `previous` state. The
feature was already advertised in Kconfig long ago, but not implemented.
SoC code has to call pmc_set_power_failure_state() at least once during
boot and needs to implement pmc_soc_set_afterg3_en() for the actual
register write.
Change-Id: Ic6970a79d9b95373c2855f4c92232d2aa05963bb
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34724
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
The MT8183 SOC has a DISP (display controller) that supports
overlay, read/write DMA, ... etc. The output of DISP goes to
display interface DSI, DPI or DBI directly.
Reference: MT8183 Application Processor Functional Spec,
6.1 Display Controller
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Kukui
Change-Id: Ic4aecc58d081f14f5d136b9ff8e813e6f40f78eb
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31478
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Move those will be shared by other MTK SOCs (for example, MT8183) to
common/ddp.c.
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Oak
Change-Id: Ie5709ab6e263caa21fdf7e799dc2ee884ffaf800
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34515
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
The 'dual DSI mode' was never used by any real boards running coreboot
and is introducing lots of complexity when it comes to refactoring.
In order to create a common display stack for MTK SOCs, we want to first
drop dual DSI mode so 8173 and 8183 DSI/DDP implementation will be more
similar to each other.
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=emerge-oak coreboot
Change-Id: I357c30cc687803ca8045d0b055dec2e22eef4291
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34693
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
PMC logic shuts down the PCH thermal sensor when CPU is in a C-state and
DTS Temp <= Low Temp Threshold (LTT) in case of Dynamic Thermal Shutdown
when S0ix is enabled.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Verified Thermal Device (B0: D20: F2) TSPM offset 0x1c [LTT (8:0)]
value is 0xFE on Sarien.
Change-Id: Ibc336be0523ff4e65a818474907faf20fc417ff4
Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33131
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
PMC logic shuts down the PCH thermal sensor when CPU is in a C-state and
DTS Temp <= Low Temp Threshold (LTT) in case of Dynamic Thermal shutdown
when S0ix is enabled.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Verified Thermal Device(B0: D18: F0) TSPM offset 0x1c [LTT (8:0)]
value is 0xFE on Arcada.
Change-Id: I1915b974b10638b0f6ab97c6fb9b7a58d2cabc59
Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Recent Coverity scan indicated potential NULL deference; if either
spi->dma_in or spi->dma_out are NULL, the fifo_error() check could
dereference a NULL pointer.
Also fixed what appears to be a logic bug for the spi->dma_out case,
where it was using the todo (count) from spi->dma_in.
Found-by: Coverity CID 1241838, 1241854
Change-Id: Icd1412f0956c0a4a75266d1873d5e9848aceee32
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34787
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The common code adheres to the Intel requirement of bringing up the
cores with INIT SIPI SIPI. This sequence is tolerated on some AMD
AMD CPUs but fails on others. Add a way to skip the second SIPI.
TEST=Mock up on grunt and verify no errors
BUG=b:138919564
Change-Id: I201869003ddc7d04d332cd5734ac6d63979d89e0
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34759
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>