In the end it does not look like RCBA register offsets are fully
compatible over southbridges.
This reverts commit d2d2aef6a3.
Is squashed with revert of "sb/intel/common: Fix conflicting OIC
register definition" 8aaa00401b.
Change-Id: Icbf4db8590e60573c8c11385835e0231cf8d63e6
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27038
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This creates a pin-route matrix first and then generates the ACPI
entries based on that. This approach has the advantage of being
simpler (no need for checks on double entries) and requiring less
access to the pci config space.
A few thing that are also fixed:
* Don't declare DEFAULT_RCBA redundantly.
* Only loop over PCI devices on bus 0
* Add a license header to rcba_pirq.c
* Remove inappropriate use of typedefs
* Fix the pin field: needs to be a byte
* Fix the source field: it should either be a byte or a path
(according to Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification
rev 2.0c)
Change-Id: Ic68a91d0cb55942a4d928b30f73e1c779142420d
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22979
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Many generations of Intel hardware have identical code concerning the
RCBA.
Change-Id: I33ec6801b115c0d64de1d2a0dc5d439186f3580a
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23287
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
