There were a number of type issues in libpayload that sneaked in
with 903f8e0.
- size_t and ssize_t were conflicting with gcc builtins
- some stdint types were used in libpayload but not defined
in our stdint.h
With this patch it's possible to compile libpayload with the
reference toolchain again.
Change-Id: Idd5ccfdd9f3536b36bceca2d101e7405883b10bc
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2903
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Some new TPM drivers in depthcharge require that type. I added it to
arch/types.h which seemed appropriate, but I'm not sure that's exactly the
right header to use, or in other words if you'd get that type from libpayload
the same way you'd get it if you were building a standard Linux program.
Also, I attempted to determine what underlying types gcc would use, and while
I think I picked the right ones I'm not 100% certain of that either.
Change-Id: Ic5c0b4173c8565ede3bfce8870976d596d69e51d
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2669
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Give some indication what happened instead of just crashing.
As part of setup, cause an exception and make sure that we get
the right one, and that we recover correctly. Hence we have
some assurance that if they really happen we can handle them.
Built and booted into test payload on Snow. Saw the built in test function
worked correctly. Artificially added code which got an exception and saw that
the error information prints correctly.
Change-Id: I2e0d022f090ee422fb988074fbb197afa2485caa
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2569
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The compiler gets mad when the types are equivalent size but not necessarily
interchangeable because of strict aliasing checks. Since uint32_t is likely to
be used when trying to read 32 bit data, it makes sense for them to be the
compatible.
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Change-Id: If73d794866055dc026fc06d6268e692adac0f835
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2411
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
This compiles, but it's not tested yet.
Change-Id: I2f73a814649aa36c39af3e77cefd8a968671f5c0
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2035
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Stefan Reinauer