IT8780F, and Fintek F71863FG.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3750 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per report from Mario Rogen. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3736 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This helps a lot if we have to track down configuration weirdnesses.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3723 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
flashrom. Not all chips support all commands, so allow the implementer
to select the matching function.
Fix a layering violation in ICH SPI code to be less bad. Still not
perfect, but the new code is shorter, more generic and
architecturally
more sound.
TODO (in a separate patch):
- move the generic sector erase code to spi.c
- decide which erase command to use based on info about the chip
- create a generic spi_erase_all_sectors function which calls the
generic sector erase function
Thanks to Stefan for reviewing and commenting.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3722 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This is slightly slower (ha, ha), but works on boards with a locked opmenu. Tested on ICH7 and works.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3721 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
as we've done with the superiotool and flashrom manpages, too (trivial).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3714 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
- SST SST39SF010A
- Winbond W29C011
Tested by me on actual hardware, all operations.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3708 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
using block erase d8 as discussed with Peter Stuge
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3707 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Martin Stecklum <stecky@gmx.net> (both write and erase).
The tests were done on an MSI MS-7065 board, so that's supported now
too (wiki page will be updated).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3697 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Untested, but should work just as well as the other *PIIX* southbridges
according to the datasheets.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3696 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
They all use a different init sequence than the more modern ITE Super I/Os.
For now we only use 0x370 as config port, but 0x3f0 or 0x3bd would also be
valid. Contrary to other Super I/Os, the config port for these is _not_
hardcoded via hardware, instead it can be programmed by software, i.e.
you get to choose whether you want to use 0x370, 0x3f0, or 0x3bd.
Tested on IT8671F by Uwe Hermann and on IT8770F by Urja Rannikko.
Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3692 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This has been tested on hardware by me.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3682 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
specification and local testing.
Also tweak a little bit algorithm for (internal) device ID calculation:
Chips from the W83627HF/F/HG/G family have an ID of 0x52 and a multitude of
revisions (0x1x, 0x3a, 0x41, maybe more), chips from the W83627HF/GF family
have the same device ID but revisions 0xfx.
Please note that the last line of the patch simply fixes the comment
about internal device ID composition (upper half of reg 0x21 is used).
I chose the most conservative way of detecting W83627HF - only if reg
0x21 value matches 0xFx we skip the previous logic and keep using it for
all other revisions.
Signed-off-by: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3670 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Based on the 5595 datasheet and uniflash 1.40 sources, only looking for info
about SiS620.
Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3668 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
enable that area once the register is set so print a warning.
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marcj.jones@amd.com>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3659 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This is useless, as it changes with each access; it doesn't convey any
useful information at all.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3658 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
The ICH9 and ICH10 data sheets are identical regarding FWH/SPI flash
interfaces, so this just adds the required PCI IDs.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3648 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Tested on actual hardware, the MSI K9AG Neo2-Digital (MS-7368).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3645 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Probing, reading, and erasing use the Jedec-routines,
whereas writing resort to the recent write_en29f002a(),
since also these chips use a byte wise algorithm.
Signed-off-by: Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3639 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3623 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
It replaces the write function to one based on write_byte_program_jedec()
instead of write_page_write_jedec(), as this part does not support page
programming.
I have verified the NT variant to fully work now, and adjusted the test
status accordingly. The N variant *should* also work with this patch, but
remains untested.
Signed-off-by: Tim ter Laak <timl@scintilla.utwente.nl>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3619 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per report from Daniel Lindenaar. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3618 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
All operations tested by me on hardware.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3615 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
To add a string to your cmos.layout, you need to specify type 's':
#start len type unused name
416 512 s 0 boot_devices
With this patch you can do
$ nvramtool -w boot_devices="(hd0,0);(hd2,1);(hd3)"
And FILO will attempt to load a menu.lst from any of these devices in that
order.
The patch is not exactly pretty, but a cleaner solution might have resulted in
a complete rewrite of the tool, which I did not want.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Joseph Smith <joe@settoplinux.org>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3613 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Fully tested for Probe/Read/Erase/Write on EN29F002NT.
Jedec subroutines 'probe_jedec()' and 'erase_chip_jedec()'
are still in use, but a tailored 'write_en29f002a()' is
needed due to a byte wise writing mechanism for this chip.
Signed-off-by: Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3602 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per report from Kevin O'Connor. Thanks Kevin!
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3570 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
targets/*/*/Makefile
targets/*/*/normal/Makefile
targets/*/*/fallback/Makefile
to use a common copy of romcc, and to leave this compiler untouched by
'make clean' in targets/*/*/fallback/ and targets/*/*/normal/ .
'make clean' in targets/*/*/ will clean romcc.
Thanks to Mats for the initial idea and implementation of a tool to do
this. This patch has almost the same behaviour as the original tool
without having to run the tool each time.
Tested for abuild-friendliness.
The patch saves ~10-12 seconds for every target using romcc. For a full
abuild run, this is ~20% time saved.
For the first 38 abuild targets, total build time is down to 13m24s
instead of 16m22s on my machine.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3564 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This removes the false positive matches we've been seeing, and also removes
the true positive match in case there is more than one flash chip and the 2nd
or 3rd are unknown - but I think that case is uncommon enough to warrant the
improvement in the common case. Use flashrom -frc forced read if you have the
uncommon case, and/or please add the flash chip to the flashchips array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3562 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per test report from Bari Ari. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3557 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per test report from Ward.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3541 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
immensly when they know more systems / cpus / chipsets
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3531 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Uwe Hermann