It's helpful to provide a distinct state that affirmatively
describes that OS resume will occur. The previous code included
the check and the actual resuming in one function. Because of this
grouping one had to annotate the innards of the ACPI resume
path to perform specific actions before OS resume. By providing
a distinct state in the boot state machine the necessary actions
can be scheduled accordingly without modifying the ACPI code.
Change-Id: I8b00aacaf820cbfbb21cb851c422a143371878bd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3134
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Many of the boot state callbacks can be scheduled at compile time.
Therefore, provide a way for a compilation unit to inform the
boot state machine when its callbacks should be called. Each C
module can export the callbacks and their scheduling requirements
without changing the shared boot flow code.
Change-Id: Ibc4cea4bd5ad45b2149c2d4aa91cbea652ed93ed
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3133
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The boot flow currently has a fixed ordering. The ordering
is dictated by the device tree and on x86 the PCI device ordering
for when actions are performed. Many of the new machines and
configurations have dependencies that do not follow the device
ordering.
In order to be more flexible the concept of a boot state machine
is introduced. At the boundaries (entry and exit) of each state there
is opportunity to run callbacks. This ability allows one to schedule
actions to be performed without adding board-specific code to
the shared boot flow.
Change-Id: I757f406c97445f6d9b69c003bb9610b16b132aa6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3132
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Aaron Durbin