Makes it more similar to what realmode looks like.
Change-Id: I4407431f2d979c43dd186114d67ed11845907afe
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1892
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The board was broken for use with CONFIG_PCI_OPTION_ROM_RUN_YABEL.
Change-Id: Ia57d630143386fe637af83b9e7345d0d3750b089
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1854
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Compose the name from Kconfig strings instead.
As the field is for debug print use only, a minor change in the output
should do no harm. The strings no longer include word "Mainboard".
Change-Id: Ifd24f408271eb5a5d1a08a317512ef00cb537ee2
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1635
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The previous commit provides a mainboard_interrupt_handlers
implementation YABEL with identical semantics to the
x86emu one, so let's use it in both cases.
This eliminates the need for the int15_install()
indirection, so let's drop that, too.
Generated using the following coccinelle patch and
manual cleanups (empty #if/#endif):
@@
type T;
identifier FUNCARR;
expression INT, HANDLER;
@@
-typedef T yabel_handleIntFunc;
-extern yabel_handleIntFunc FUNCARR[256];
-FUNCARR[INT] = HANDLER;
+mainboard_interrupt_handlers(INT, &HANDLER);
@@
@@
-void int15_install(void)
-{
-mainboard_interrupt_handlers(0x15, &int15_handler);
-}
@@
@@
-void int15_install(void)
-{
-mainboard_interrupt_handlers(0x15, &int15_handler); ... mainboard_interrupt_handlers(0x15, &int15_handler);
-}
@@
@@
-int15_install();
+mainboard_interrupt_handlers(0x15, &int15_handler);
Change-Id: I70fd780d7ebf1564a2ff7d7148411673f6de113c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1559
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The includes removed here were previously required for
struct lb_memory and lb_add_memory_range().
Change-Id: Ie6c0d4ef55c2225aa709cf3fbad30ff1080e3610
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1391
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Use of lb_add_memory_region() is reduntant with the MMCONF
resource being set as reserved.
Change-Id: I747ea34823692b6966b2e50d22aea1fb89c73c25
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1394
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
UMA region can be determined at any time after the amount
of RAM is known and before the uma_resource() call.
Change-Id: I2a0bf2d3cad55ee70e889c88846f962b7faa0c7e
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1379
Reviewed-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
mainboard_config never worked right, at least not since we've had sconfig.
Hence, drop mainboard/<vendor>/<device>/chip.h and fix up the mainboards that
tried to use it anyways.
Change-Id: I7cd403ea188d8a9fd4c1ad15479fa88e02ab8e83
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1359
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Use of uma_resource() in AMD northbridge code created a memory
resource marked as reserved. Such resources are removed
from system memory in write_coreboot_table().
Change-Id: Ib5e49e851d6622d8ece9d6d612e245b3962b9167
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>
These boards had identical UMA code:
amd/dbm690t
amd/pistachio
technexion/tim5690
technexion/tim8690
The ones below had whitespace or debug level change
compared to the one above:
kontron/kt690
siemens/sitemp_g1p1
These boards use AMDFAM10 guidelines in code:
asrock/939a785gmh
amd/mahogany
Change-Id: Id7c3f48035727f5847f2d7c3a6e87a3d15582003
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1210
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Use of the uma_memory_base and _size variables is very scattered.
Implementation of setup_uma_memory() will appear in each northbridge.
It should be possible to do this setup entirely in northbridge
code and get rid of the globals in a follow-up.
Change-Id: I07ccd98c55a6bcaa8294ad9704b88d7afb341456
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1204
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
The code is loosely based on AMD dbm690t (and copied from there)
and adapted to match the Siemens SITEMP-G1 board.
It boots both Linux and Windows XP (and if it doesn't then complain
with me [Patrick] because in that case I must have messed it up when
integrating the patch)
Signed-off-by: Josef Kellermann <seppk@arcor.de>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6567 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
