This patch aligns pistachio to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Urara.
Change-Id: I0609b307695ba6a922384ac34dd604bffcb20692
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0a577918babf26adf10baa0f56a7065f5659d285
Original-Change-Id: I3ed405a3efdeec28965538d19a22f2b5b8204f01
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224503
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9335
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Danube has become Pistachio, let's rename all instances where this SOC
is mentioned.
BUG=none
TEST=board urara still builds
Change-Id: Iea91419121eb6ab5665c2f9f95e82f461905268e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 58696cc7c77a70dca2bfd512d695d143e1097a78
Original-Change-Id: Ie5ede401c4f69ed5d832a9eabac008eeac6db62d
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/220401
Original-Reviewed-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9048
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Not much is happening yet, when the board is enabled (in the next
patch), all three components build successfully, the map files show
them placed where expected and the bopotblock is wrappeed in a BIMG
header.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31438
TEST=when config is enabled, emerge-urara coreboot succeeds. more
extensive testing to come later
Change-Id: Ib7396189f4bee0fdd6a8ce5c9ab1277806cb5dcc
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1ca9efe59a7fcb99412410d509a7f9a91b6ef3ec
Original-Change-Id: I573cfb70f5c1e612dfa0a55d3d22d92f00584c66
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/214600
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9047
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
