The update-fit command takes in a parameter for number of slots
in the FIT table. It then processes the microcobe blob in cbfs
adding those entries to the FIT table. However, the tracking of
the number of mircocode updates was incremented before validating
the update. Therefore, move the sanity checking before an increment
of the number of updates.
Change-Id: Ie8290f53316b251e500b88829fdcf9b5735c1b0e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/50319
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4161
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Clean whitespace errors that have gotten past lint-stable-003-whitespace
and gerrit review.
Change-Id: Id76fc68e9d32d1b2b672d519b75cdc80cc4f1ad9
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3920
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Griffith <Bruce.Griffith@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
In the great tradition of LinuxBIOS this allows adding
a kernel as payload. add-payload is extended to also
allow adding an initial ramdisk (-I filename) and a
command line (-C console=ttyS0).
Change-Id: Iaca499a98b0adf0134e78d6bf020b6531a626aaa
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3302
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This simplifies storing SeaBIOS parameters in CBFS.
Change-Id: I301644ba0d7a9cb5917c37a3b4ceddfa59e34e77
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3733
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Cppcheck warns about a memory leak, present since adding romtool,
which was renamed to cbfstool, in commit 5d01ec0f.
$ cppcheck --version
Cppcheck 1.59
[…]
[cbfs-mkstage.c:170]: (error) Memory leak: buffer
[…]
Indeed the memory pointed to by `buffer` is not freed on the error path,
so add `free(buffer)` to fix this.
Change-Id: I6cbf82479027747c800c5fe847f20b779e261ef4
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3069
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The LZMA glue code in cbfstool was recently rewritten from C++
to plain C code in:
commit aa3f7ba36e
Author: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Mar 28 16:51:45 2013 -0700
cbfstool: Replace C++ code with C code
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3010
In the progress of doing so, the stream position for the
input stream and output stream was not reset properly. This
would cause LZMA producing corrupt data when running the
compression function multiple times.
Change-Id: I096e08f263aaa1931517885be4610bbd1de8331e
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3040
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
cbfstool was using a C++ wrapper around the C written LZMA functions.
And a C wrapper around those C++ functions. Drop the mess and rewrite
the functions to be all C.
Change-Id: Ieb6645a42f19efcc857be323ed8bdfcd9f48ee7c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3010
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The help text says --machine, but the code
actually checked for --arch. Fix it!
Change-Id: Ib9bbf758b82ef070550348e897419513495f154b
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3009
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Add support for filling in the Firmware Interface Table.
For now it only supports adding microcode entries.
It takes 2 options:
1. Name of file in cbfs where the mircocode is located
2. The number of empty entries in the table.
Verified with go firmware tools. Also commented out updating
microcode in the bootblock. When romstage runs, the CPUs indicate
their microcode is already loaded.
Change-Id: Iaccaa9c226ee24868a5f4c0ba79729015d15bbef
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2712
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
- The read-only structures are const now
- cosmetic fixes
- put { on a new line for functions
- move code after structures
Change-Id: Ib9131b80242b91bd5105feaebdf8306a844da1cc
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2922
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
When calculating initial CBFS empty entry space, the size of header itself must
be not included (with the reserved space for entry name). This is a regression
of the old cbfstool size bug.
Before this fix, in build process we see:
OBJCOPY cbfs/fallback/romstage_null.bin
W: CBFS image was created with old cbfstool with size bug.
Fixing size in last entry...
And checking the output binary:
cbfstool build/coreboot.pre1 print -v -v
DEBUG: read_cbfs_image: build/coreboot.pre1 (262144 bytes)
DEBUG: x86sig: 0xfffffd30, offset: 0x3fd30
W: CBFS image was created with old cbfstool with size bug.
Fixing size in last entry...
DEBUG: Last entry has been changed from 0x3fd40 to 0x3fd00.
coreboot.pre1: 256 kB, bootblksz 688, romsize 262144, offset 0x0 align: 64
Name Offset Type Size
(empty) 0x0 null 261296
DEBUG: cbfs_file=0x0, offset=0x28, content_address=0x28+0x3fcb0
After this fix, no more alerts in build process.
Verified to build successfully on x86/qemu and arm/snow configurations.
Change-Id: I35c96f4c10a41bae671148a0e08988fa3bf6b7d3
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2731
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
cbfstool usage change:
"-a" for "cbfstool locate" can specify base address alignment.
To support putting a blob in aligned location (ex, microcode needs to be aligned
in 0x10), alignment (-a) is implemented into "locate" command.
Verified by manually testing a file (324 bytes) with alignment=0x10:
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f test -n test -a 0x10
# output: 0x71fdd0
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f test -n test -t raw -b 0x71fdd0
cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v -v
# output: test 0x71fd80 raw 324
# output: cbfs_file=0x71fd80, offset=0x50, content_address=0x71fdd0+0x144
Also verified to be compatible with old behavior by building i386/axus/tc320
(with page limitation 0x40000):
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f romstage_null.bin -n romstage -P 0x40000
# output: 0x44
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f x.bin -n romstage -P 0x40000 -a 0x30
# output: 0x60
Change-Id: I78b549fe6097ce5cb6162b09f064853827069637
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2824
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
cbfstool usage change:
The "-a" parameter for "cbfstool locate" is switched to "-P/--page-size".
The "locate" command was used to find a place to store ELF stage image in one
memory page. Its argument "-a (alignment)" was actually specifying the page size
instead of doing memory address alignment. This can be confusing when people are
trying to put a blob in aligned location (ex, microcode needs to be aligned in
0x10), and see this:
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f test.bin -n test -a 0x40000
# output: 0x44, which does not look like aligned to 0x40000.
To prevent confusion, it's now switched to "-P/--page-size".
Verified by building i386/axus/tc320 (with page limitation 0x40000):
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f romstage_null.bin -n romstage -P 0x40000
# output: 0x44
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0893adde51ebf46da1c34913f9c35507ed8ff731
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2730
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
In the file `COPYING` in the coreboot repository and upstream [1]
just one space is used.
The following command was used to convert all files.
$ git grep -l 'MA 02' | xargs sed -i 's/MA 02/MA 02/'
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
Change-Id: Ic956dab2820a9e2ccb7841cab66966ba168f305f
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2490
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
The "offset" in cbfs-mkpayload should be printed as type %lu
instead of %d as `gcc` rightfully warns about.
gcc -g -Wall -D_7ZIP_ST -c -o /srv/filme/src/coreboot/util/cbfstool/cbfs-mkpayload.o cbfs-mkpayload.c
cbfs-mkpayload.c: In function ‘parse_fv_to_payload’:
cbfs-mkpayload.c:284:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
cbfs-mkpayload.c:296:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
This warning was introduced in the following commit.
commit 4610247ef1
Author: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Date: Sat Feb 9 13:26:19 2013 +0100
cbfstool: Handle alignment in UEFI payloads
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2334
Change-Id: I50c26a314723d45fcc6ff9ae2f08266cb7969a12
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2440
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tiano for X64 is much cleaner to start up when using higher alignments in
firmware volumes. These are implemented using padding files and sections
that cbfstool knew nothing about. Skip these.
Change-Id: Ibc433070ae6f822d00af2f187018ed8b358e2018
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2334
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
On platforms with CBFS data filling end of ROM image without bootblock in the
end (ex, ARM), calculation of "next valid entry" may exceed ROM image buffer in
memory and raise segmentation fault when we try to compare its magic value.
To fix this, always check if the entry address is inside ROM image buffer.
Verified to build and boot successfully on qemu/x86 and armv7/snow.
Change-Id: I117d6767a5403be636eea2b23be1dcf2e1c88839
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2330
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
For arm/snow, current bootblock is larger than previously assigned CBFS offset
and will fail to boot. To prevent this happening again in future, cbfstool now
checks if CBFS will overlap bootblock.
A sample error message:
E: Bootblock (0x0+0x71d4) overlap CBFS data (0x5000)
E: Failed to create build/coreboot.pre1.tmp.
arm/snow offset is also enlarged and moved to Kconfig variable.
Change-Id: I4556aef27ff716556040312ae8ccb78078abc82d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2295
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Right now cbfstool only accepts firmware volumes with
a x86 SEC core and refuses an x86-64 SEC core because
some magic values and the extended PE header are
different. With this patch, both IA32/x64 images are
supported. (No check is done whether the mainboard
actually supports 64bit CPUs, so careful!)
This needs another patch to Tiano Core that switches
to long mode after jumping to the 64bit entry point.
Right now that code assumes we're already in 64bit code
and the machine crashes.
Change-Id: I1e55f1ce1a31682f182f58a9c791ad69b2a1c536
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
This removes the hack implemented in http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/2280
(and should make using 64bit Tiano easier, but that's not yet supported)
Change-Id: Ie30129c4102dfbd41584177f39057b31f5a937fd
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2281
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
add-payload, add-stage, and add-flat-binary are now all using cbfs_image API.
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom add-stage -f FILE -n fallback/romstage -b 0xXXXX
cbfstool coreboot.rom add-payload -f FILE -n fallback/pyload
And compare with old cbfstool.
Verified to boot on ARM(snow) and X86(qemu-i386).
Change-Id: If65cb495c476ef6f9d90c778531f0c3caf178281
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2220
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The "add" command is compatible with all legacy usage. Also, to support
platforms without top-aligned address, all address-type params (-b, -H, -l) can
now be ROM offset (address < 0x8000000) or x86 top-aligned address (address >
0x80000000).
Example:
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f config -n config -t raw -b 0x2000
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f stage -n newstage -b 0xffffd1c0
Verified boot-able on both ARM(snow) and x86(QEMU) system.
Change-Id: I485e4e88b5e269494a4b138e0a83f793ffc5a084
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Usage Changes: To support platforms with different memory layout, "create" takes
two extra optional parameters:
"-b": base address (or offset) for bootblock. When omitted, put bootblock in
end of ROM (x86 style).
"-H": header offset. When omitted, put header right before bootblock,
and update a top-aligned virtual address reference in end of ROM.
Example: (can be found in ARM MAkefile):
cbfstool coreboot.rom create -m armv7 -s 4096K -B bootblock.bin \
-a 64 -b 0x0000 -H 0x2040 -o 0x5000
Verified to boot on ARM (Snow) and X86 (QEMU).
Change-Id: Ida2a9e32f9a459787b577db5e6581550d9d7017b
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2214
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
To support platforms without top-aligned address mapping like ARM, "locate"
command now outputs platform independent ROM offset by default. To retrieve x86
style top-aligned virtual address, add "-T".
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f stage -n stage -a 0x100000 -T
# Example output: 0xffffdc10
Change-Id: I474703c4197b36524b75407a91faab1194edc64d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2213
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Old cbfstool may produce CBFS image with calculation error in size of last empty
entry, and then corrupts master header data when you really use every bit in
last entry. This fix will correct free space size when you load ROM images with
cbfs_image_from_file.
Change-Id: I2ada319728ef69ab9296ae446c77d37e05d05fce
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2211
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
To delete a component (file) from existing CBFS ROM image.
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom remove -n fallback/romstage
# and compare with old cbfstool output result.
Change-Id: If39ef9be0b34d8e3df77afb6c9f944e02f08bc4e
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2208
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Change the "extract" command to use cbfs_export_entry API. Nothing changed in
its usage.
To verify, run "cbfstool coreboot.rom extract -f blah -n blah" and check if the
raw type file is correctly extracted.
Change-Id: I1ed280d47a2224a9d1213709f6b459b403ce5055
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2207
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Process CBFS ROM image by new cbfs_image API.
To verify, run "cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v" and compare with old cbfstool.
Change-Id: I3a5a9ef176596d825e6cdba28a8ad732f69f5600
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2206
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Current cbfstool implementation is relying on global variables to pass processed
data, and the calculation of address is based on x86 architecture (ex, always
assuming 0x0000 as invalid address), not easy to be used on platforms without
top-aligned memory mapping. This CL is a first step to start a new cbfstool
without global variables, and to prevent assuming memory layout in x86 mode.
The first published APIs are for reading and writing existing CBFS ROM image
files (and to find file entries in a ROM file).
Read cbfs_image.h for detail usage of each API function.
Change-Id: I28c737c8f290e51332119188248ac9e28042024c
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2194
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Many functions in cbfstool need to deal with a memory buffer - both location and
size. Right now it's made by different ways: for ROM image using global variable
(romsize, master_header); and in cbfs-* using return value for size and char**
to return memory location.
This may cause bugs like assuming incorrect return types, ex:
uint32_t file_size = parse(); // which returns "-1" on error
if (file_size <= 0) { ...
And the parse error will never be caught.
We can simplify this by introducing a buffer API, to change
unsigned int do_something(char *input, size_t len, char **output, ...)
into
int do_something(struct buffer *input, struct buffer *output, ...)
The buffer API will be used by further commits.
Change-Id: Iaddaeb109f08be6be84c6728d72c6a043b0e7a9f
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2205
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The syntax of cbfstool has been changed for a while (using getopt). Updated
EXAMPLE file to show the right way to test cbfstool.
Change-Id: I5cb41b76712d8c2403fffc9fdad83c61fb2af98c
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2215
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
The 'host_bigendian' variable (and functions relying on it like ntohl/htonl)
requires host detection by calling static which_endian() first -- which may be
easily forgotten by developers. It's now a public function in common.c and
doesn't need initialization anymore.
Change-Id: I13dabd1ad15d2d6657137d29138e0878040cb205
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2199
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
The ELF parsing and payload building in add-flat-binary command should be
isolated just like mkpayload and mkstage.
Since the add-flat-binary command creates a payload in the end , move payload
processing to cbfs-mkpayload.c.
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom add-flat-binary -f u-boot.bin -n fallback/payload \
-l 0x100000 -e 0x100020
To verify, get output from "cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v":
fallback/payload 0x73ccc0 payload 124920
INFO: code (no compression, offset: 0x38, load: 0x1110000, length:..)
Change-Id: Ia7bd2e6160507c0a1e8e20bc1d08397ce9826e0d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2197
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Add -v (verbose) to every command, and allow printing debug messages.
Revise logging and debugging functions (fprintf(stderr,...), dprintf...)
and verbose message printing with following macros:
ERROR(xxx): E: xxx
WARN(xxx) W: xxx
LOG(xxx) xxx
INFO(...) INFO: xxx (only when runs with -v )
DEBUG(...) DEBUG: xxx (only when runs with more than one -v)
Example:
cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f file -n file -t raw -v -v
Normal output (especially for parsing) should use printf, not any of these
macros (see usage() and cbfs_locate(), cbfs_print_directory() for example).
Change-Id: I167617da1a6eea2b07075b0eb38e3c9d85ea75dc
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2196
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Calling basename(3) may modify content. We should allocate another buffer to
prevent corrupting input buffer (full file path names).
Change-Id: Ib4827f887542596feef16e7829b00444220b9922
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2203
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Currently "cbfstool locate" outputs a hex number without "0x" prefix.
This makes extra step (prefix 0x, and then generate another temp file) in build
process, and may be a problem when we want to allow changing its output format
(ex, using decimal). Adding the "0x" in cbfstool itself should be better.
Change-Id: I639bb8f192a756883c9c4b2d11af6bc166c7811d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2201
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
cbfs-mk*.c does not work with real files / command line so header files with
file I/O and getopt can be removed.
Change-Id: I9d93152982fd4abdc98017c983dd240b81c965f5
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
cbfstool.c uses lots of global variables for command line options and all named
as "rom*". This may be confusing when other global variables also start with
rom, ex: int size = rom_size + romsize;
(rom_size is from command line and romsize is the size of last loaded ROM image).
If we pack all rom_* into a struct it may be more clear, ex:
do_something(param.cbfs_name, param.size, &romsize);
Change-Id: I5a298f4d67e712f90e998bcb70f2a68b8c0db6ac
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2195
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Show what's in a stage or payload. This will let people better understand
what's in a stage or payload.
Change-Id: If6d9a877b4aedd5cece76774e41f0daadb20c008
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2176
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
This replaces hard-coded bootblock offsets using the new scheme.
The assembler will place the initial branch instruction after BL1,
skip 2 aligned chunks, and place the remaining bootblock code after.
It will also leave an anchor string, currently 0xdeadbeef which
cbfstool will find. Once found, cbfstool will place the master CBFS
header at the next aligned offset.
Here is how it looks:
0x0000 |--------------|
| BL1 |
0x2000 |--------------|
| branch |
0x2000 + align |--------------|
| CBFS header |
0x2000 + align * 2 |--------------|
| bootblock |
|--------------|
TODO: The option for alignment passed into cbfstool has always been
64. Can we set it to 16 instead?
Change-Id: Icbe817cbd8a37f11990aaf060aab77d2dc113cb1
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2148
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This tidies up the ARMV7 case when creating cbfs:
- Calculate the offset using the size of the master header and offsets
rather than using a magic constant.
- Re-order some assignments so things happen in a logical order.
Change-Id: Id9cdbc3389c8bb504fa99436c9771936cc4c1c23
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2125
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
From index(3):
CONFORMING TO 4.3BSD; marked as LEGACY in POSIX.1-2001. POSIX.1-2008
removes the specifications of index() and rindex(), recommending
strchr(3) and strrchr(3) instead.
Change-Id: I3899b9ca9196dbbf2d147a38dacd7e742a3873fe
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: zbao <fishbaozi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2112
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Most hton and noth functions are already available
through the system headers we include on OS X, causing
the compiler to warn about duplicate definitions.
Change-Id: Id81852dfc028cf0c48155048c54d431436889c0e
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2106
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The 'VERSION' in CBFS header file is confusing and may conflict when being used
in libpayload.
Change-Id: I24cce0cd73540e38d96f222df0a65414b16f6260
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2098
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
The "offs" provided on the command-line was not taken into account
when creating an image for armv7...
Change-Id: I1781bd636f60c00581f3bd1d54506f0f50bb8ad0
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2092
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Otherwise cbfstool will segfault if you try to add an x86
payload to an ARM image.
Change-Id: Ie468005ce9325a4f17c4f206c59f48e39d9338df
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2028
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Aaron Durbin