As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Urara CBFS header configuration is broken. CBFS header needs to be
right above the bootblock, and the CBFS data - 0x100 bytes above, to
allow room for proper CBFS wrapper structures.
Ideally only the header offset should be specified (and even that
could be derived from the bootblock size). But this is a more generic
problem to be addressed with different architectures' image layout
requirements in mind.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31438
TEST=coreboot image passes the integrity check now (it was failing
before because CBGS header was overlaying the bootblock)
$ FEATURES=noclean emerge-urara coreboot
$ /build/urara/tmp/portage/sys-boot/coreboot-9999/work/coreboot-9999/build/util/bimgtool/bimgtool \
/build/urara/firmware/coreboot.rom.serial
$ cbfstool /build/urara/firmware/coreboot.rom.serial print
coreboot.rom.serial: 1024 kB, bootblocksize 9956, romsize 1048576, offset 0x4100
alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: mips
Name Offset Type Size
fallback/romstage 0x4100 stage 7100
fallback/ramstage 0x5d00 stage 18995
config 0xa780 raw 2452
(empty) 0xb140 null 1003096
Change-Id: Id615bdcc6261dea9f36a409bd90f1e4764353bb9
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 8a0115963aa7460e4c7255ab8508d7d52d67fb67
Original-Change-Id: Id200ab5421661ef39b7c7713e931c39153fdc8be
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/227523
Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9187
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Add the build infrastructure and basic architectural support required
to build for targets using the MIPS architecture. This is sufficient
to run on a simulator, but will require the addition of some cache
maintenance and timer setup in order to run on real hardware.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31438, chromium:409082
TEST=none yet
Change-Id: I027902d8408e419b626d0aab7768bc564bd49047
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fcc0d934d7223922c878b1f87021cb5c2d7e6f21
Original-Change-Id: If4f99554463bd3760fc142477440326fd16c67cc
Original-Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/207972
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8760
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Patrick Georgi