This mirrors the naming convention of handlers in
northbridge and southbridge.
Change-Id: I45d97c569991c955f0ae54ce909d8c267e9a5173
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2058
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
the prefix was introduced in the early v2 tree many years ago
because our old build system "newconfig" could not handle two files with
the same name in different paths like /path/to/usb.c and
/another/path/to/usb.c correctly. Only one of the files would end up
being compiled into the final image.
Since Kconfig (actually since shortly before we switched to Kconfig) we
don't suffer from that problem anymore. So we could drop the sb700_
prefix from all those filenames (or, the <componentname>_ prefix in general)
- makes it easier to fork off a new chipset
- makes it easier to diff against other chipsets
- storing redundant information in filenames seems wrong
Signed-off-by: <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6149 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Build-tested using abuild.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5844 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
while others dislike them being extra commits, let's clean them up once and
for all for the existing code. If it's ugly, let it only be ugly once :-)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5507 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5266 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
ram init fails, as the i945 driver currently only supports the mobile version
of the chipset..
Not sure how much sense it makes to check this in, but since it's a nice and
cheap board, maybe someone wants to work on this.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4879 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
