This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
* Adding separate targets for 32bit and 64bit qemu
* Using the riscv64 toolchain for 32bit builds requires setting -m elf32lriscv
* rv32/rv64 is currently configured with ARCH_RISCV_RV32/RV64 and not per stage.
This should probably be changed later.
TEST=Boots to "Payload not loaded." on 32bit qemu using the following commands:
util/riscv/make-spike-elf.sh build/coreboot.rom build/coreboot.elf
qemu-system-riscv32 -M virt -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.elf
Change-Id: I35e59b459d1770df10b51fe9e77dcc474d7c75a0
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31253
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
```
if (!(a & (0xffff << 16))) {
^~
src/lib/libgcc.c:40:18: error: result of '255 << 24' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Werror=shift-overflow=]
if (!(a & (0xff << 24))) {
^~
src/lib/libgcc.c:45:17: error: result of '15 << 28' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Werror=shift-overflow=]
if (!(a & (0xf << 28))) {
^~
```
Change-Id: I7bdd75c20a76b303743d7e7e0d3a6503760284fd
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/23361
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This patch adds a few bit counting functions that are commonly needed
for certain register calculations. We previously had a log2()
implementation already, but it was awkwardly split between some C code
that's only available in ramstage and an optimized x86-specific
implementation in pre-RAM that prevented other archs from pulling it
into earlier stages.
Using __builtin_clz() as the baseline allows GCC to inline optimized
assembly for most archs (including CLZ on ARM/ARM64 and BSR on x86), and
to perform constant-folding if possible. What was previously named log2f
on pre-RAM x86 is now ffs, since that's the standard name for that
operation and I honestly don't have the slightest idea how it could've
ever ended up being called log2f (which in POSIX is 'binary(2) LOGarithm
with Float result, whereas the Find First Set operation has no direct
correlation to logarithms that I know of). Make ffs result 0-based
instead of the POSIX standard's 1-based since that is consistent with
clz, log2 and the former log2f, and generally closer to what you want
for most applications (a value that can directly be used as a shift to
reach the found bit). Call it __ffs() instead of ffs() to avoid problems
when importing code, since that's what Linux uses for the 0-based
operation.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:273023
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built on Big, Falco, Jerry, Oak and Urara. Compared old and new
log2() and __ffs() results on Falco for a bunch of test values.
Change-Id: I599209b342059e17b3130621edb6b6bbeae26876
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 3701a16ae944ecff9c54fa9a50d28015690fcb2f
Original-Change-Id: I60f7cf893792508188fa04d088401a8bca4b4af6
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/273008
Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10394
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Julius Werner