- The read-only structures are const now
- cosmetic fixes
- put { on a new line for functions
- move code after structures
Change-Id: Ib9131b80242b91bd5105feaebdf8306a844da1cc
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2922
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
When calculating initial CBFS empty entry space, the size of header itself must
be not included (with the reserved space for entry name). This is a regression
of the old cbfstool size bug.
Before this fix, in build process we see:
OBJCOPY cbfs/fallback/romstage_null.bin
W: CBFS image was created with old cbfstool with size bug.
Fixing size in last entry...
And checking the output binary:
cbfstool build/coreboot.pre1 print -v -v
DEBUG: read_cbfs_image: build/coreboot.pre1 (262144 bytes)
DEBUG: x86sig: 0xfffffd30, offset: 0x3fd30
W: CBFS image was created with old cbfstool with size bug.
Fixing size in last entry...
DEBUG: Last entry has been changed from 0x3fd40 to 0x3fd00.
coreboot.pre1: 256 kB, bootblksz 688, romsize 262144, offset 0x0 align: 64
Name Offset Type Size
(empty) 0x0 null 261296
DEBUG: cbfs_file=0x0, offset=0x28, content_address=0x28+0x3fcb0
After this fix, no more alerts in build process.
Verified to build successfully on x86/qemu and arm/snow configurations.
Change-Id: I35c96f4c10a41bae671148a0e08988fa3bf6b7d3
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2731
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
cbfstool usage change:
"-a" for "cbfstool locate" can specify base address alignment.
To support putting a blob in aligned location (ex, microcode needs to be aligned
in 0x10), alignment (-a) is implemented into "locate" command.
Verified by manually testing a file (324 bytes) with alignment=0x10:
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f test -n test -a 0x10
# output: 0x71fdd0
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f test -n test -t raw -b 0x71fdd0
cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v -v
# output: test 0x71fd80 raw 324
# output: cbfs_file=0x71fd80, offset=0x50, content_address=0x71fdd0+0x144
Also verified to be compatible with old behavior by building i386/axus/tc320
(with page limitation 0x40000):
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f romstage_null.bin -n romstage -P 0x40000
# output: 0x44
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f x.bin -n romstage -P 0x40000 -a 0x30
# output: 0x60
Change-Id: I78b549fe6097ce5cb6162b09f064853827069637
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2824
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
On platforms with CBFS data filling end of ROM image without bootblock in the
end (ex, ARM), calculation of "next valid entry" may exceed ROM image buffer in
memory and raise segmentation fault when we try to compare its magic value.
To fix this, always check if the entry address is inside ROM image buffer.
Verified to build and boot successfully on qemu/x86 and armv7/snow.
Change-Id: I117d6767a5403be636eea2b23be1dcf2e1c88839
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2330
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
For arm/snow, current bootblock is larger than previously assigned CBFS offset
and will fail to boot. To prevent this happening again in future, cbfstool now
checks if CBFS will overlap bootblock.
A sample error message:
E: Bootblock (0x0+0x71d4) overlap CBFS data (0x5000)
E: Failed to create build/coreboot.pre1.tmp.
arm/snow offset is also enlarged and moved to Kconfig variable.
Change-Id: I4556aef27ff716556040312ae8ccb78078abc82d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2295
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
The "add" command is compatible with all legacy usage. Also, to support
platforms without top-aligned address, all address-type params (-b, -H, -l) can
now be ROM offset (address < 0x8000000) or x86 top-aligned address (address >
0x80000000).
Example:
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f config -n config -t raw -b 0x2000
cbfstool coreboot.rom add -f stage -n newstage -b 0xffffd1c0
Verified boot-able on both ARM(snow) and x86(QEMU) system.
Change-Id: I485e4e88b5e269494a4b138e0a83f793ffc5a084
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Usage Changes: To support platforms with different memory layout, "create" takes
two extra optional parameters:
"-b": base address (or offset) for bootblock. When omitted, put bootblock in
end of ROM (x86 style).
"-H": header offset. When omitted, put header right before bootblock,
and update a top-aligned virtual address reference in end of ROM.
Example: (can be found in ARM MAkefile):
cbfstool coreboot.rom create -m armv7 -s 4096K -B bootblock.bin \
-a 64 -b 0x0000 -H 0x2040 -o 0x5000
Verified to boot on ARM (Snow) and X86 (QEMU).
Change-Id: Ida2a9e32f9a459787b577db5e6581550d9d7017b
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2214
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
To support platforms without top-aligned address mapping like ARM, "locate"
command now outputs platform independent ROM offset by default. To retrieve x86
style top-aligned virtual address, add "-T".
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom locate -f stage -n stage -a 0x100000 -T
# Example output: 0xffffdc10
Change-Id: I474703c4197b36524b75407a91faab1194edc64d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2213
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Old cbfstool may produce CBFS image with calculation error in size of last empty
entry, and then corrupts master header data when you really use every bit in
last entry. This fix will correct free space size when you load ROM images with
cbfs_image_from_file.
Change-Id: I2ada319728ef69ab9296ae446c77d37e05d05fce
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2211
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
To delete a component (file) from existing CBFS ROM image.
To test:
cbfstool coreboot.rom remove -n fallback/romstage
# and compare with old cbfstool output result.
Change-Id: If39ef9be0b34d8e3df77afb6c9f944e02f08bc4e
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2208
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Change the "extract" command to use cbfs_export_entry API. Nothing changed in
its usage.
To verify, run "cbfstool coreboot.rom extract -f blah -n blah" and check if the
raw type file is correctly extracted.
Change-Id: I1ed280d47a2224a9d1213709f6b459b403ce5055
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2207
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Process CBFS ROM image by new cbfs_image API.
To verify, run "cbfstool coreboot.rom print -v" and compare with old cbfstool.
Change-Id: I3a5a9ef176596d825e6cdba28a8ad732f69f5600
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2206
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Current cbfstool implementation is relying on global variables to pass processed
data, and the calculation of address is based on x86 architecture (ex, always
assuming 0x0000 as invalid address), not easy to be used on platforms without
top-aligned memory mapping. This CL is a first step to start a new cbfstool
without global variables, and to prevent assuming memory layout in x86 mode.
The first published APIs are for reading and writing existing CBFS ROM image
files (and to find file entries in a ROM file).
Read cbfs_image.h for detail usage of each API function.
Change-Id: I28c737c8f290e51332119188248ac9e28042024c
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2194
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Stefan Reinauer