Depending on the compiler options, subsections of the form
of .section.subsection could be generated. Therefore, include
those subsections for .bss, .sbss, and .data.
Change-Id: I80dd64d8c62e7bc449ee2bbc0a22a941777e2ea6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5407
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
This framework was only available in ramstage. So we had to define
console output functions separately for bootblock, romstage and SMM.
Follow-up patches will re-enable all the consoles removed here,
in a more flexible fashion, and with less lines-of-code and copy-paste.
Also the driver list is not in a well-defined order and some of the
loops could exit without visiting all drivers.
NOTE: This build has no console in ramstage.
Change-Id: Iaddc495aaca37e2a6c2c3f802a0dba27bf227a3e
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5337
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Start using the rmodtool for generating rmodules.
rmodule_link() has been changed to create 2 rules:
one for the passed in <name>, the other for creating
<name>.rmod which is an ELF file in the format of
an rmodule.
Since the header is not compiled and linked together
with an rmodule there needs to be a way of marking
which symbol is the entry point. __rmodule_entry is
the symbol used for knowing the entry point. There
was a little churn in SMM modules to ensure an
rmodule entry point symbol takes a single argument.
Change-Id: Ie452ed866f6596bf13f137f5b832faa39f48d26e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5379
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Many of the boot state callbacks can be scheduled at compile time.
Therefore, provide a way for a compilation unit to inform the
boot state machine when its callbacks should be called. Each C
module can export the callbacks and their scheduling requirements
without changing the shared boot flow code.
Change-Id: Ibc4cea4bd5ad45b2149c2d4aa91cbea652ed93ed
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3133
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
While debugging a crash it was discovered that ld was inserting
address space for sections that were empty depending on section
address boundaries. This led to the assumption breaking down that
on-disk payload (code/data bits) was contiguous with the address
space. When that assumption breaks down relocation updates change
the wrong memory. Fix this by making the rmodule.ld linker script
put all code/data bits into a payload section.
Change-Id: Ib5df7941bbd64662090136e49d15a570a1c3e041
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3149
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The x86 linker script added a .textfirst section. In
order to properly link ramstage as a relocatable module
the .textfirst section needs to be included.
Also, the support for code coverage was added by including
the constructor section and symbols. Coverage has not been
tested as I suspect it might not work in a relocatable
environment without some tweaking. However, the section
and symbols are there if needed.
Change-Id: Ie1f6d987d6eb657ed4aa3a8918b2449dafaf9463
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2883
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Coreboot's ramstage defines certain sections/symbols in its fixed
static linker script. It uses these sections/symbols for locating the
drivers as well as its own program information. Add these sections
and symbols to the rmodule linker script so that ramstage can be
linked as an rmodule. These sections and symbols are a noop for other
rmodule-linked programs, but they are vital to the ramstage.
Also add a comment in coreboot_ram.ld to mirror any changes made there
to the rmodule linker script.
Change-Id: Ib9885a00e987aef0ee1ae34f1d73066e15bca9b1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2786
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
By including the heap in the bss output section the size is accounted
for in a elf PT_LOAD segment. Without this change the heap wasn't being
put into a PT_LOAD segment. The result is a nop w.r.t. functionality,
but readelf and company will have proper MemSiz fields.
Change-Id: Ibfe9bb87603dcd4c5ff1c57c6af910bbba96b02b
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2750
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
A rmodule is short for relocation module. Relocaiton modules are
standalone programs. These programs are linked at address 0 as a shared
object with a special linker script that maintains the relocation
entries for the object. These modules can then be embedded as a raw
binary (objcopy -O binary) to be loaded at any location desired.
Initially, the only arch support is for x86. All comments below apply to
x86 specific properties.
The intial user of this support would be for SMM handlers since those
handlers sometimes need to be located at a dynamic address (e.g. TSEG
region).
The relocation entries are currently Elf32_Rel. They are 8 bytes large,
and the entries are not necessarily in sorted order. An future
optimization would be to have a tool convert the unsorted relocations
into just sorted offsets. This would reduce the size of the blob
produced after being processed. Essentialy, 8 bytes per relocation meta
entry would reduce to 4 bytes.
Change-Id: I2236dcb66e9d2b494ce2d1ae40777c62429057ef
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2692
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Aaron Durbin