Code coverage requires `lcov`, so update the docs to call it out
specifically.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie2898faa5188a7174c4e56ba34f1a4f02f939b03
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
These issues were found and fixed by codespell, a useful tool for
finding spelling errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: If2a8e97911420c19e9365d5c28810b998f2c2ac8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58078
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Fix the exclusion path for lcov; it should exclude the directory
with source code, not object files.
Use the COV environment variable to
* control whether we build for coverage or not
* select the output directory
Add a separate target for generating the report, so we can get a
report for all of the tests together or just a single test.
Add documentation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@google.com>
Change-Id: I2bd2bfdedfab291aabeaa968c10b17e9b61c9c0a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54072
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
The manifest example has to be marked as code. The Manifest parsing
section header should be L2 and finally # is a special character in
markdown.
Change-Id: I38cb1a508ec9ccb39cb39048de3742a5cb595f7b
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36199
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
I originally put up this document for discussion in 2015
(mailing list: https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/message/FXX4V2OSXAQC4B2VUENSFZEWRPPOVRH2/)
(doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o2bFl5HCHDFPccQsOwa-75A8TWojjFiGK3r0yeIc7Vo/edit)
It may be time to revisit the way we define our image layouts now that
there are new fmap schemes for new vboot uses. The approach outlined in
this document may or may not be the right one, but it's something we
have, so let's discuss.
Compared to the doc, this will
* be updated (things changed in the last 3.5 yearws)
* integrate feedback to the doc and on the mailing list back then
Change-Id: Ib40d286e2c9b817f55e58ecc5c9bc8b832ac5783
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32687
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Paul Fagerburg