So far this is used by the USB driver, and instead of
having ifdefs all throughout that code, implement the same
API on x86 and ARM.
Change-Id: I8093ad818ad2e38a0901787aa8674faf591d580c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/56105
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4320
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The way we got to include the compiler includes was kind of whacky.
Instead of mixing in potentially problematic headers, make libpayload
self-contained by adding some missing header files. Also clean up
conflicting definitions of size_t throughout the tree.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Change-Id: I0ad1194de1a00b7133c5477c00eb167d63a2ee85
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/47608
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3058
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
There were a number of type issues in libpayload that sneaked in
with 903f8e0.
- size_t and ssize_t were conflicting with gcc builtins
- some stdint types were used in libpayload but not defined
in our stdint.h
With this patch it's possible to compile libpayload with the
reference toolchain again.
Change-Id: Idd5ccfdd9f3536b36bceca2d101e7405883b10bc
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2903
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Some new TPM drivers in depthcharge require that type. I added it to
arch/types.h which seemed appropriate, but I'm not sure that's exactly the
right header to use, or in other words if you'd get that type from libpayload
the same way you'd get it if you were building a standard Linux program.
Also, I attempted to determine what underlying types gcc would use, and while
I think I picked the right ones I'm not 100% certain of that either.
Change-Id: Ic5c0b4173c8565ede3bfce8870976d596d69e51d
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2669
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Stefan Reinauer