They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Use of device_t has been abandoned in ramstage.
Change-Id: I05a46ab0ae6b4493895c1231fedb59c96efdf793
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26457
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
TEST=Build for cyan
Change-Id: Ib5c6a1bf5308a8add42d7371854b80ea53d7ae84
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18870
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Functions in file pcie.c is not needed.
TEST=Boot and test wifi and video playback
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/298965
Original-Tested-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I70337c0fc61c221330836ef17f6cefea8c5f0f11
Signed-off-by: Shaunak Saha <shaunak.saha@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12737
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Add the files to support the Braswell SOC.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for a Braswell platform
Change-Id: I968da68733e57647d0a08e4040ff0378b4d59004
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10051
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Follow up for commit b890a12, some contributions brought
back a number of FSF addresses, so get rid of them again.
Change-Id: I0ac0c957738ce512deb0ed82b2219ef90d96d46b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10322
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
