I can't commit to the time investment required to mentor properly and
it's unfair to potential mentees to make them think otherwise.
Change-Id: I07d0fe048d4cda8ec9181ef0ee09185fa1682af4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73288
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Yabits is no longer maintained and git repo is archived.
Yabits has not been maintained for a long time,
the project is apparently closed.
Change-Id: Ida0bb79342448510d2c309339fabbe8066eca73c
Signed-off-by: Elias Souza <eliascontato@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72463
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Depending on the actual issue and the experience of the contributor,
"Easy projects" might not be an appropriate description for Coverity
issues and similar things.
Thus rename this section to "Small projects" and also update references
to it.
Change-Id: I3bdefd9f37440ab3ae493095b7fb5c76394d2ba1
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72447
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
coreboot uses TianoCore interchangeably with EDK II, and whilst the
meaning is generally clear, it's not the payload it uses. EDK II is
commonly written as edk2.
coreboot builds edk2 directly from the edk2 repository. Whilst it
can build some components from edk2-platforms, the target is still
edk2.
[1] tianocore.org - "Welcome to TianoCore, the community supporting"
[2] tianocore.org - "EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform
firmware development environment for the UEFI and UEFI Platform
Initialization (PI) specifications."
Signed-off-by: Sean Rhodes <sean@starlabs.systems>
Change-Id: I4de125d92ae38ff8dfd0c4c06806c2d2921945ab
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65820
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
These issues were found and fixed by codespell, a useful tool for
finding spelling errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: If2a8e97911420c19e9365d5c28810b998f2c2ac8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58078
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This project is already implemented and therefore should not be
mentioned anymore as a new project idea in the documentation.
Change-Id: I38c6e274e416b98485943d36536a57a14743945b
Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55991
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
The coverity project is done, for the most part, so drop it. Expand
a bit on the scope of the toolchain binary project, and point out
that the Ghidra project already has code from GSoC 2019 but could be
developed further.
Change-Id: I7342cc3133494f69b175b11b1f8342a0f40840e7
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39086
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
This has been implemented last year.
Change-Id: I24e40a7a9a9d7238b8c9d34656d5b62a26b8252b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38533
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The MIPS architecture port has been added 5+ years ago in order to
support a Chrome OS project that ended up going nowhere. No other board
has used it since and nobody is still willing or has the expertise and
hardware to maintain it. We have decided that it has become too much of
a mainenance burden and the chance of anyone ever reviving it seems too
slim at this point. This patch eliminates all MIPS code and
MIPS-specific hacks.
Change-Id: I5e49451cd055bbab0a15dcae5f53e0172e6e2ebe
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34919
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
It may be useful to have a common, easily available toolbench for
firmware analysis and Ghidra looks promising.
Change-Id: I56d0ff875bb939f6d31f088232f8a6fd168abbb6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31806
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
One-off packages do us little good, we need to be able to automate
building them.
Change-Id: Idd9b6b231435ea9d6e946c7ccaa71174b497742c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31804
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The requirements read a bit as if we only encourage coreboot experts to
try to take on these projects. These requirements should be understood
as "this is what you'll need to learn", hopefully guiding interested
people in picking a project that suits their interests.
Change-Id: I43b6e2e0df5f00e1ded8d14cee8c771e3f595ce7
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31480
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some
architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with
it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31415
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Adding the Kernel Address Sanitizer feature to coreboot would help to
find bugs.
Change-Id: If00010e81147ec50e037678230df17c6888e40a2
Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31414
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
We already had such a page on the wiki, but it's outdated and the wiki
is supposed to go the way of the dodo anyway.
This is a fresh start to make sure that all ideas we're coming up with
are still current and that there are mentors willing to support them.
Change-Id: Idd68f845930bd37a2293969b9a153cf584d6d15f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30972
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Patrick Georgi