This change moves all ACPI table support in coreboot currently living
under arch/x86 into common code to make it architecture
independent. ACPI table generation is not really tied to any
architecture and hence it makes sense to move this to its own
directory.
In order to make it easier to review, this change is being split
into multiple CLs. This is change 5/5 which moves the addition of ACPI
table related files from arch/x86/Makefile.inc to acpi/Makefile.inc.
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: I8143fd37357aeb0561516450adddc6714d539ada
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40940
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
This change moves all ACPI table support in coreboot currently living
under arch/x86 into common code to make it architecture
independent. ACPI table generation is not really tied to any
architecture and hence it makes sense to move this to its own directory.
In order to make it easier to review, this change is being split into
multiple CLs. This is change 1/5 which moves .c files from arch/x86 to
acpi/.
The only acpi files that are still retained under arch/x86 are:
a. acpi_s3.c: This doesn't really deal with ACPI tables. Also, there
are some assumptions in there about SMM which will have to be resolved
if this file needs to be moved to common code.
b. acpi_bert_storage.c/bert_storage.h: This file is currently written
specifically with x86 in mind. So, not moving the file for now.
Motivation for this change: Not all stages on Picasso SoC are targeted
for the same architecture. For example, verstage (if runs before
bootblock) will be targeted for non-x86. This makes it difficult to
add device tree to verstage which would be required to get to SoC
configs from the tree. This is because the device tree on x86
platforms currently contains a lot of devices that require ACPI
related enums and structs (like acpi_gpio, acpi_pld, acpi_dp and so
on). Hence, this change removes all ACPI table support out of
arch/x86.
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: Icc6b793c52c86483a8c52e0555619e36869a869e
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40930
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
ACPI_SATA_GENERATOR is currently used to include sata.c in
ramstage. However, there is no need to guard this inclusion using a
separate Kconfig. All other files that deal with ACPI tables are
included based on the state of HAVE_ACPI_TABLES. This change includes
sata.c in ramstage if HAVE_ACPI_TABLES is selected. If the ACPI
function isn't used, linker will optimize it out.
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: I9a319cfe7c3f973b15ccbd0f13bd1ed07571a398
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40928
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
While I was working on updating the headers to move copyrights into
the AUTHORS file, I got a request to switch to SPDX headers as well.
Linux has moved completely to SPDX headers, which are easier to
maintain, have good definitions, are very short, and can be checked
automatically. This is completely unlike our current header situation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Ie86d34f7fa7bf7434ad8a38aa1eadcfece7124b3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36176
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
generate_sata_ssdt_ports() generates ports based on sata enable map
Change-Id: Ie68e19c93f093d6c61634c4adfde484b88f28a77
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9708
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Furquan Shaikh