Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Durbin d972f78e75 linking: link bootblock.elf with .data and .bss sections again
Currently coreboot expects the loader to clear the bss section
for all stages. i.e. stages don't clear their own bss. On ARM
SoCs the BootROM would be responsible for this. To do that
one needs to include the bss section data (all zeros) in the
bootblock.bin file. This was previously being attempted by
keeping the .bss info in the .data section because objcopy
happened zero out non-file allocated data section data.

Instead go back to linking bootblock with the bss section
but mark the bss section as loadable allocatable data. That
way it will be included in the binary properly when objcopy
-O binary is emplyed. Also do the same for the data section
in the case of no non-zero object values are in the data
section.

Without this change the trick of including .bss in .data
was not working when there wasn't a non-zero value object
in the data section.

BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built emulation/qemu-armv7 and noted bootblock.bin contains
     the cleared bss.

Change-Id: I94bd404c2c4a8b9332393e6224e98940a9cad4a2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11680
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-22 21:22:44 +00:00
Julius Werner 52a92606bb linking: Repair special treatments for non-x86 bootblocks
Patch b2a62622b (linking: move romstage and bootblock to use program.ld)
unified the linker scripts between different stages. Unfortunately it
omitted several special cases from the old bootblock.ld script that are
required for non-x86 environments.

This patch expands program.ld to once again merge the .BSS into the
program image for bootblocks (ensuring correct initialization by the
external loader). It also revives the .id section (which adds a
human-readable blurb of information to the top of an image) and fixes a
problem with unintended automated section alignment.

BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Jerry and Oak boot again.

Change-Id: I54271b8b59a9c773d858d676cde0218cb7f20e74
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 6fddbc00963e363039634fa31a9b66254b6cf18f
Original-Change-Id: I4d748056f1ab29a8e730f861879982bdf4c33eab
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/299413
Original-Tested-by: Yidi Lin <yidi.lin@mediatek.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11660
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-17 14:17:55 +00:00
Aaron Durbin 83bc0db777 x86: link ramstage the same way regardless of RELOCATABLE_RAMSTAGE
Previously there were 2 paths in linking ramstage. One was used for
RELOCATABLE_RAMSTAGE while the other was fixed location. Now that
rmodtool can handle multiple secitons for a single proram segment
there's no need for linking ramstage using lib/rmodule.ld.  That
also means true rmodules don't have symbols required for ramstage
purposes so fix memlayout.h. Lastly add default rules for creating
rmod files from the known file names and locations.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built rambi. Inspected ramstage.debug as well as rmodules
     created during the build.

Change-Id: I98d249036c27cb4847512ab8bca5ea7b02ce04bd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11524
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-09 19:36:08 +00:00
Aaron Durbin dde7629e9c rmodule: use program.ld for linking
Bring rmodule linking into the common linking method.
The __rmodule_entry symbol was removed while using
a more common _start symbol. The rmodtool will honor
the entry point found within the ELF header. Add
ENV_RMODULE so that one can distinguish the environment
when generating linker scripts for rmodules. Lastly,
directly use program.ld for the rmodule.ld linker script.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built rambi and analyzed the relocatable ramstage,
     sipi_vector, and smm rmodules.

Change-Id: Iaa499eb229d8171272add9ee6d27cff75e7534ac
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11517
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-09 19:35:30 +00:00
Aaron Durbin 14714e1303 x86: link romstage like the other architectures
All the other architectures are using the memlayout
for linking romstage. Use that same method on x86
as well for consistency.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built a myriad of boards. Analyzed readelf output.

Change-Id: I016666c4b01410df112e588c2949e3fc64540c2e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11510
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-09 19:35:12 +00:00
Aaron Durbin 4de29d48ed linking: lay the groundwork for a unified linking approach
Though coreboot started as x86 only, the current approach to x86
linking is out of the norm with respect to other architectures.
To start alleviating that the way ramstage is linked is partially
unified. A new file, program.ld, was added to provide a common way
to link stages by deferring to per-stage architectural overrides.
The previous ramstage.ld is no longer required.

Note that this change doesn't handle RELOCATABLE_RAMSTAGE
because that is handled by rmodule.ld. Future convergence
can be achieved, but for the time being that's being left out.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built a myriad of boards.

Change-Id: I5d689bfa7e0e9aff3a148178515ef241b5f70661
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11507
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2015-09-09 19:34:37 +00:00
Renamed from src/lib/ramstage.ld (Browse further)