I think that since the directory specifies the architecture and the
board, it is redundant information to name it something else, and it
makes it more difficult to automate the build process (buildrom).
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <myles@pel.cs.byu.edu>
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3090 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Due to the automatic nature of this update, I am self-acking. It worked in
abuild.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3053 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
since it is still our most wide-spread codebase.
The patch is pretty trivial, and nobody except Torsten even looked at
it in a week, so....
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@2880 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Here's a patch which makes all "option ROM_SIZE" lines use x*y format
which is a lot easier to read and modify, without having to use your
brain or a calculator ;-)
Tested with abuild, no errors.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@2398 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Myles Watson