Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Jourdan e70471b645 Move CBFS header to a safer place.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jourdan <thomas.jourdan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4547 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-08-17 15:19:52 +00:00
Patrick Georgi fabde37cb8 - AMD selected a couple of options that are incompatible with QEmu (and
probably others). Only select them for AMD

- Make the bootblock smaller (only one copy of it), and don't pad the
bootblock using dd(1), but top-align inside cbfstool, to reduce
dependencies on unix tools.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4542 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-08-13 15:29:01 +00:00
Ronald G. Minnich 6ce41c06cc This is transition code for cbfs to implement
cbfs files at fixed addresses.

I call this transitional as the approach I am taking is to add
capability to cbfstool but not change code in a way that will break
existing usages. Later, once we're sure nothing has broken, we can start to 
smooth the edges. 

Right now, fixed address file are only supported via the add command. 

There is one additional command syntax, so, example:
cbfstool add rom romstrap optionrom 0xffffd000

Will add the file to that fix location for a romstrap.

The assumption is that the ROM is based at the end of a 32-bit address
space. As you can see from the code, that assumption can easily be
over-ridden, if we ever need to, with a command option.

Here is one example output result.

rminnich@xcpu2:~/src/bios/coreboot-v2/util/cbfstool$ ./cbfstool x.cbf print
x.cbf: 1024 kB, bootblocksize 32768, romsize 1048576, offset 0x0
Alignment: 16 bytes

Name                           Offset     Type         Size
h                              0x0        optionrom   251
                             0x130      free         917120
h3                             0xdffe0    optionrom    251
                             0xe0110    free         97960

The way this is implemented is pretty simple. I introduce a new
operator, split, that splits an unallocated area into two unallocated
areas. Then, allocation merely becomes a matter of 0, 1, or 2 splits:
0 split -- the free area is the exact fit
1 splits -- need to split some off the front or back
2 splits -- need to split off BOTH the front and back

I think you'll be able to see what I've done. I call this transitional
because, in the end state, we only need one allocate function; for now
I've left two in, to make sure I don't break compatibilty.

Why I like this better than ldscript approach: I like having the
ROMSTRAP located by cbfs, not linker scripts. For one thing, it makes
romstrap visible as a first class object. I think I would have latched
onto a problem I was having much more quickly had I remembered the
ROMSTRAP. It gets lost in the linker scripts.

At this point, we should be able to start removing special ROMSTRAP location 
code from linker scripts. 

Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4351 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-06-08 03:33:57 +00:00
Patrick Georgi c7a6447c8f cbfstool reacts to a too large bootblock file by stopping
with an error code now.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4329 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-06-01 20:02:21 +00:00
Ronald G. Minnich 56ae8fcb6f This patch implements a "flash friendly" value for initialized areas of flash.
It makes the write part of flashrom dramatically faster with small
payloads like filo; and it also eliminates unnecessary wear on flash
by not writing zeros (it's unlikely this really matters; let me know 
next time you flash a BIOS flash 100,000 times!). 

More importantly, it allows for future partial flash upgrades with cbfs. 

Note that uninitialized_flash_value is a global that can, if we ever need it, 
be set by an argument in main. Assuming we ever see a flash where the 
"erased" value is 0, not 0xff. 

At the same time, "erased" value has been "1" on every EEPROM or 
FLASH I've used for some time now. 

Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>




git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4290 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-05-16 23:05:20 +00:00
Ronald G. Minnich 83b8f0c485 I have made a very simple mod to cbfstool that is compatible with the
src/lib/ code in coreboot. I.e. the tool changes but the coreboot code
does not.

Currently, as cbfstool manages the ROM, there are files and empty
space. To allocate files, the code does, first, a walk of the headers
and, if that fails, does a brute-force search of the rest of the
space.

We all agree that the brute-force search has lots of problems from a
performance and correctness standpoint.

I've made a slight change. Instead of an "empty space" area with no
valid headers, I've made a header for the empty space.

So cbfs creation looks like this:
- set up the boot block
- create a file, of type CBFS_COMPONENT_NULL, that contains the empty
space. CBFS_COMPONENT_NULL was already defined in cbfs.h

Here's an example:

[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs create 1048576 2048
(cbfstool) E: Unable to open (null): Bad address
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs print
testcbfs: 1024 kB, bootblocksize 2048, romsize 1048576, offset 0x0
Alignment: 16 bytes

Name                           Offset     Type         Size
                              0x0        0xffffffff   1046456

So how do we create a new file?

It's easy: walk the files and find a file of type CBFS_COMPONENT_NULL,
which is as large
or larger than the file you are trying to create. Then you use that file.
- if the file is the same size as the NULL file, then it's easy: take it
- if the file is smaller than the NULL file, you split the NULL file
into two parts.

note that this works in the base case: the base case is that the whole
storage is CBFS_COMPONENT_NULL.

Here's an example of adding a file.
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs add-stage testfixed t
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs print
testcbfs: 1024 kB, bootblocksize 2048, romsize 1048576, offset 0x0
Alignment: 16 bytes

Name                           Offset     Type         Size
t                              0x0        stage        23176
                              0x5ab0     0xffffffff   1023240

Note that the NULL split and got smaller. But the entire ROM is still
contained by the two files. To walk this entire rom will require two
FLASH accesses.

Add another file:
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs add-stage testfixed tt
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$ ./cbfstool testcbfs print
testcbfs: 1024 kB, bootblocksize 2048, romsize 1048576, offset 0x0
Alignment: 16 bytes

Name                           Offset     Type         Size
t                              0x0        stage        23176
tt                             0x5ab0     stage        23176
                              0xb560     0xffffffff   1000024
[rminnich@xcpu2 cbfstool]$

So, taking current ROMs as an example, I can reduce FLASH accesses for
cbfs from (potentially) thousands to (typically) less than 10.

Index: fs.c
Changes for readability and cleanliness. Move common blobs of code to functions. 
New function: rom_alloc,which allocates files by finding NULL files and using/splitting. 
Other changes as needed to support this usage. 
Index: util.c
Creating a cbfs archive now requires creation of a NULL file covering the file system space. 
Index: cbfs.h
Add a DELETED file type with value 0. Any file can be marked deleted by zero its type; this is a 
FLASH-friendly definition for all known FLASH types. 

Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>

I think it is a step in the right direction.  Could you add the
function prototype to cbfstool.h?

Acked-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
(I added the prototype)




git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4261 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-05-08 19:23:00 +00:00
Myles Watson fa12b67771 Remove warnings from compilation of the s2892 with and without CBFS.
I didn't try to remove "defined but not used" warnings because there are too
many ifdefs to be sure I wouldn't break something.

For shadowed variable declarations I renamed the inner-most variable.  

The one in src/pc80/keyboard.c might need help.  I didn't change the
functionality but it looks like a bug.

I boot tested it on s2892 and abuild tested it.

Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4240 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-04-30 22:45:41 +00:00
Myles Watson 72631a01fa The master cbfs record was located at the end of the flash and overwrote
anything that was there.  For ck804 or mcp55-based machines that was the
romstrap.

The fix is simple:
1. Put the master cbfs record above the bootblock instead of on it.

Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4209 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-04-25 12:39:04 +00:00
Peter Stuge 1d862ded11 v2/util: romfs -> cbfs rename
It's all sed here. romfs->cbfs, ROMFS->CBFS, romtool->cbfstool

Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4110 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-04-14 00:08:34 +00:00
Renamed from util/romtool/util.c (Browse further)