Leave it under BOOTMODE_STRAPS to control whether these have
any functional meaning on the build.
Change-Id: Ieb59aa7ab4b1e8da6a1002e7a8e5462eb7988d35
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
spd.bin can reside anywhere in CBFS, and we only use CBFS APIs to
access and read it. As such, there is no need to hardcode it, and it
can collide with mrc.bin or mrc.cache on some boards. Do not use a
specific position for spd.bin, but instead let cbfstool find the
optimal placement.
Change-Id: I496094d3c0de708813494095b7ac4be8addb4112
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5210
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Peppy SPD table has 4GB configurations followed by 2GB configurations.
Current implementation does remapping to point 2GB configuration to the
same SPD index as the 4GB. This is different than Falco, which simply
duplicates the SPD data for all configurations. To simplify probing in
mosys, copy the Falco implementation of duplicating SPD data.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idb185a437f3cf4f40d2dae1ae59c30235df8f489
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/61847
Reviewed-by: Dave Parker <dparker@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jay Kim <yongjaek@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4369
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
On some systems there may be 2GB SKU that is the same as the
4GB SKU but just one channel of memory. In that case we need
to ensure that both copies of the same SPD source end up
populated by ensuring that repeated entries are included by
using $+ instead of $^.
Alternatively we could do the check inside romstage, but it
is already set to behave this way if the SPD gets populated
correctly.
I changed spd_index to 3 in falco romstage to force it to
pretend it was a 2GB config of the same memory, then booted
to ensure it was indeed limited to 2GB.
memcfg channel[0] config (00780008):
ECC inactive
enhanced interleave mode on
rank interleave on
DIMMA 2048 MB width x16 single rank, selected
DIMMB 0 MB width x16 single rank
memcfg channel[1] config (00600000):
ECC inactive
enhanced interleave mode on
rank interleave on
DIMMA 0 MB width x8 single rank, selected
DIMMB 0 MB width x8 single rank
Change-Id: Ibfe5051ccda2fe69e8caff3f3c264116e3411c65
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59483
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Jay Kim <yongjaek@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4319
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Peppy RAM ID table is as follows:
000 41K256M16HA
001 H5TC4G63AFR
010 EDJ4216EFBG
Elpida SPD taken from Ib1e430cd390b4dbc013fc0802f1a59c1a0412577 by
dlaurie.
Change-Id: Iac156a2d25435514f28e2e73bef617d0fe2d90a1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/56687
Tested-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Parker <dparker@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4201
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Taken directly from slippy with only constant + string changes.
(Peppy port of I4172460d3b075bfd5bb22013a6225cf0e8f95b9c by dlaurie)
The following changes are required in a subsequent commit:
- Add Elpida SPD data.
- Update GPIO map.
- Remove iSSD power sequencing.
- Update USB port map.
Change-Id: I01dfb841f0e9186cf8a0a23f72e7be986a83be42
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/56513
Tested-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Parker <dparker@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
