328d2e2a7d
It's not perfect and we'll need to find a better place for that, but I'll look into that as part of the big board-status rework. Change-Id: I2ae50c58e3796563e0b2370105abc82b7e2e042a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi.software> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33930 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bucketize.sh | ||
foreword.html | ||
README | ||
status-to-html.sh | ||
tohtml.sh |
Scripts to publish board-status data to the wiki ================================================ These scripts parse the board-status repository (and the coreboot repository as companion) to build a meaningful representation of the test coverage stored in board-status. The server runs these nightly (CET/CEST), so no user interaction with the wiki page is needed. How to use ---------- When modifying the scripts, or when publishing the results elsewhere, you might want to run them yourself. You'll need the board-status and the coreboot repository checked out side by side, named "board-status" and "coreboot" respectively (in particular without .git suffix). To emit wiki-text, in the board-status repository's top-level directory, run $ ../util/board_status/to-wiki/status-to-wiki.sh The output ends up on stdout, so you'll have to store it yourself, if you need it later. `push-to-wiki.sh FILENAME TITLE` can be used to push a file into the wiki. User credentials are looked up in ~/.wikiaccount, which should look like USERNAME=user USERPASS=password How it works ------------ status-to-wiki collects the reports and sorts them in buckets by report date. These can have weekly, monthly and quarterly granularity. It then passes these into the towiki script, which reads the data in more details and prints them in the output format. Contributions ------------- These scripts are rather bare, and you're welcome to extend them to extract more useful data from both repositories, and to present the data in a nicer way. A rewrite into another (reasonable) language is fine, too - shell quickly finds its limits for this kind of text processing.