85bb946362
Apparently acpica-unix is shipped under "A non-open source license (the 'Intel license')" while acpica-unix2 comes under GPLv2/BSD dual license. (see https://acpica.org/Licensing) So go with unix2. Change-Id: I412812187bbf488eb4ad6d7fb8d2840f2f5e06d4 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13686 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpica-unix2-20150619_iasl.patch | ||
binutils-2.25_fix-aarch64.patch | ||
binutils-2.25_host-clang.patch | ||
binutils-2.25_no-bfd-doc.patch | ||
binutils-2.25_riscv.patch | ||
cfe-3.7.1.src_frontend.patch | ||
gcc-5.2.0_elf_biarch.patch | ||
gcc-5.2.0_gnat.patch | ||
gcc-5.2.0_riscv.patch | ||
gdb-7.9.1_no-doc.patch | ||
gdb-7.9.1_pythonhome.patch |