Without that fix we have the following issue when building a release:
makeinfo \
--pdf \
--no-split \
-o pages/manual/gnuboot.pdf \
../manual/gnuboot.texi
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.22 [...]
[...]
Writing index file gnuboot.cp
[1{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [2] [-1] Chapter 1
./../manual/gnuboot.texi:122: epsf.tex not found, images will be ignored.
@image ...f.tex not found, images will be ignored}
[...]
./../manual/gnuboot.texi:122: Emergency stop.
@image ...f.tex not found, images will be ignored}
@global @warnednoepsftrue ...
l.122 mainboard.}
./../manual/gnuboot.texi:122: ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file pro
duced!
[...]
./../manual/gnuboot.texi:122: ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file pro
duced!
Transcript written on gnuboot.log.
/usr/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting.
make: *** [Makefile:767: pages/manual/gnuboot.pdf] Error 1
The epsf.tex can be found in the texlive-plain-generic package in
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/epsf/epsf.tex.
This issue was introduced by the commit
08b9e449e9 ("Add a minimal GNU Boot
manual.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix we have the following issue when building a release:
ROM image release archives available at release/roms/
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a race-free mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking for awk... awk
[...]
checking for tex... no
This issue was introduced by the commit
08b9e449e9 ("Add a minimal GNU Boot
manual.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Tested-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix we have the following issue when building a release:
ROM image release archives available at release/roms/
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a race-free mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking for awk... awk
[...]
checking for makeinfo... no
This issue was introduced by the commit
08b9e449e9 ("Add a minimal GNU Boot
manual.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Tested-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix we have the following issue when building a release:
ROM image release archives available at release/roms/
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a race-free mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking for awk... awk
[...]
checking for gm... no
This issue was introduced by the commit
08b9e449e9 ("Add a minimal GNU Boot
manual.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Tested-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
The goal is to minimize the difference with the
resources/dependencies/trisquel script.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
This makes sure that there is only one apt command that is called.
Since this change results in the some package names (like 'git') being
passed twice to apt install, this situation was tested with 'apt
install sl sl' on Trisquel 10 (nabia), Trisquel 11 (aramo) and also
PureOS 10 (byzantium) in case the trisquel and pureos dependencies are
merged later on, and it worked fine.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Tested-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
This package is unused since the commit
e50f311c45 ("dependencies: pureos: go
back to apt (instead of packagekit).").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
This package is unused since the commit
3f85c3ff22 ("dependencies: trisquel: go
back to apt (instead of packagekit).").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
The history if the pureos-10 file is shared with the one of the
trisquel-10 file until the ubuntu2004 file was forked into the debian
file in the commit 8a79f7b163 ("Fix
https://notabug.org/libreboot/lbmk/issues/59").
Because of that, like the trisquel file, the pureos-10 file was first
introduced by Leah Rowe in 2014 as it cannot be found in 2013
Libreboot tarball releases (20131212, 20131213, 20131214) but it is
found in 20140711.
We then have the complete history through the
obsolete-repository-preserved-for-historical-purposes, osbmk and GNU
Boot repositories.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
neox: fixed own email address
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In the commit 0f74569af0 ("dependencies:
switch arch, debian, fedora35, ubuntu2004 to packagekit"), the
Trisquel script was converted to use packagekit to then be able to
unify the dependency management between several distributions.
However GNU Boot doesn't build directly on Parabola, and the build is
completely untested on Fedora and Void, so the other scripts are less
important. In contrast building GNU Boot is regularely tested on
PureOS 10 (byzantium) and Trisquel 11 (aramo).
Since the Guix debootstrap package can be used to safely create
chroots of PureOS and Trisquel, it may be possible to use that to
build GNU Boot on any distributions.
However packagekit requires a daemon to work:
# pkcon install guix
Failed to contact PackageKit: Could not connect:
No such file or directory
And in turn the /usr/libexec/packagekitd daemon requires dbus as shown
by the /lib/systemd/system/packagekit.service file:
[Unit]
Description=PackageKit Daemon
# PK doesn't know how to do anything on ostree-managed systems;
# currently the design is to have dedicated daemons like
# eos-updater and rpm-ostree, and gnome-software talks to those.
ConditionPathExists=!/run/ostree-booted
Wants=network-online.target
[Service]
Type=dbus
BusName=org.freedesktop.PackageKit
User=root
ExecStart=/usr/libexec/packagekitd
So reverting back to apt seems a safe choice for now.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In the commit 0f74569af0 ("dependencies:
switch arch, debian, fedora35, ubuntu2004 to packagekit"), the
Trisquel script was converted to use packagekit to then be able to
unify the dependency management between several distributions.
However GNU Boot doesn't build directly on Parabola, and the build is
completely untested on Fedora and Void, so the other scripts are less
important. In contrast building GNU Boot is regularely tested on
PureOS 10 (byzantium) and Trisquel 11 (aramo).
Since the Guix debootstrap package can be used to safely create
chroots of PureOS and Trisquel, it may be possible to use that to
build GNU Boot on any distributions.
However packagekit requires a daemon to work:
# pkcon install guix
Failed to contact PackageKit: Could not connect:
No such file or directory
And in turn the /usr/libexec/packagekitd daemon requires dbus as shown
by the /lib/systemd/system/packagekit.service file:
[Unit]
Description=PackageKit Daemon
# PK doesn't know how to do anything on ostree-managed systems;
# currently the design is to have dedicated daemons like
# eos-updater and rpm-ostree, and gnome-software talks to those.
ConditionPathExists=!/run/ostree-booted
Wants=network-online.target
[Service]
Type=dbus
BusName=org.freedesktop.PackageKit
User=root
ExecStart=/usr/libexec/packagekitd
So reverting back to apt seems a safe choice for now.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix, 'sudo resources/dependencies/pureos-10' results in
the following issue:
Finished [=========================]
Command failed: Expected package name, actually got file.
Try using 'pkcon install-local libtool' instead.
And with this patch the command above works fine:
Finished [=========================]
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix, 'make release' fails with the following error:
[...]
ROM image release archives available at release/roms/
set -o pipefail ; ./build release website | tee -a make-1732208182.log
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal --force
autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Autoheader
autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing
autoreconf: Leaving directory `.'
[...]
checking for dot... no
configure: error: dot was not found in PATH ([...])
make: *** [Makefile:710: release] Error 1
This happens because during releases we also ship a tarball of the
website, and the commit 388c0ef3d0
("website: add history page of the GNU Boot git repositories.")
started using dot without also adding the graphviz dependency in the
dependencies for building releases.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix, 'make release' fails with the following error:
ROM image release archives available at release/roms/
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a race-free mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking for awk... awk
[...]
checking for dot... no
This happens because during releases we also ship a tarball of the
website, and the commit 388c0ef3d0
("website: add history page of the GNU Boot git repositories.")
started using dot without also adding the graphviz dependency in the
dependencies for building releases.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix, Trisquel fails with the following error:
Resolving [=========================]
Package not found: ttf-unifont
Command failed: This tool could not find any available package:
No packages were found
And when installing ttf-uifont with apt, we get this error:
# apt install ttf-unifont
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Package ttf-unifont is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
fonts-unifont
E: Package 'ttf-unifont' has no installation candidate
The ttf-unifont dependency was introduced in Libreboot when it didn't
use git yet. It can be found in Libreboot's 5th release, second
revision[1] in libreboot_src/builddeb.
[1]https://rsync.libreboot.org/oldstable/20140622/libreboot_src.tar.gz
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix running the script results in the following error:
# ./resources/dependencies/trisquel
+ ./resources/dependencies/trisquel
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
packagekit-tools is already the newest version (1.2.5-2ubuntu2+11.0trisquel1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
awk: cmd. line:1: {print
awk: cmd. line:1: ^ unexpected newline or end of string
The issue was introduced in the commit
94118b896a ("dependencies: Trisquel 10:
Fix script for non-english locales.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without this fix we have the following error on Trisquel 11 when
building the GRUB payload:
configure: error: qemu, coreboot and loongson ports need unifont
Trisquel 10 also has an 'unifont' package, and installing it doesn't
break the build of the GRUB payload.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
When pandoc is already installed on Trisquel 10, we have the
following:
# pkcon -y --allow-reinstall install pandoc
Resolving [=========================] Package not found: pandoc
Command failed: This tool could not find any available package: No packages were found
Since install_packages takes care of not trying to reinstall a package
that is already installed, using that instead fixes this issue.
This was broken by the commit 8a181f112f
("dependencies: trisquel: Add pandoc").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In French 'Installed' is 'Installé', and so when French is being used,
the grep that is used to understand if a package is already installed
fails.
This was broken by the commit 5050b5365e
("dependencies: trisquel-10: workaround package not found if already
installed.").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
The trisquel-10 file was first introduced by Leah Rowe in 2014 as it
cannot be found in 2013 Libreboot tarball releases (20131212,
20131213, 20131214) but it is found in 20140711.
We then have the complete history through the
obsolete-repository-preserved-for-historical-purposes, osbmk and GNU
Boot repositories.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix, with a very basic Trisquel 11 (aramo) installation
and after running resources/dependencies/trisquel-10, the GNU Boot
autogen.sh is broken due to the lack of libtool:
$ ./autogen.sh 2>&1 > temp
autoreconf: export WARNINGS=
autoreconf: Entering directory '.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal --force
autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Intltool
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gtkdoc
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
configure.ac:79: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
So we simply make sure that libtool is installed as part of the
dependencies.
For Arch, libtool is already in base-devel (checked with Parabola).
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Several scripts in the SeaBIOS source code used during its build use
'#!/usr/bin/env python' but there is no 'python' when installing
Trisquel through debootstrap.
So to fix that we simply add the python-is-python3 package which
creates the /usr/bin/python symlink and points it to python3.
This work is based on the commit
eeddd2b610 ("build/dependencies: debian:
adding python-is-python3 to build seabios properly").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix 'make release' fails with the following error:
checking for mkdir... mkdir
checking for pandoc... no
configure: error: pandoc was not found in PATH
(/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games)
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In Trisquel 10 (nabia) there is no lib32ncurses5-dev package anymore.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In Trisquel 10 (nabia) there is no lib32tinfo-dev package anymore.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
If wget isn't installed and that we install it, it works fine:
# pkcon -y --allow-reinstall install wget
Resolving [=========================]
Installing [=========================]
Loading cache [=========================]
Running [=========================]
Installing packages [=========================]
Finished [=========================]
But then if we try again it fails because it's already installed:
# pkcon -y --allow-reinstall install wget
Resolving [=========================]
Package not found: wget
Command failed: This tool could not find any available package: No
packages were found
So for now we need to workaround this issue.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
We can't require contributors to install Debian as it has freedom
issues[1] but for contributors, installing PureOS is easier since
it's at least FSDG compliant[2]. So it makes sense to show that
PureOS is the primary target here.
This is also reflected in the reality as the current GNU Boot
maintainers already installed PureOS 10 inside virtual machines
and/or containers to test this script and build the GNU Boot 0.1
RC1 release.
[1]https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html#Debian
[2]https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
We can't require contributors to install Ubuntu as it has freedom
issues[1] but for contributors, installing Trisquel is easier since
it's at least FSDG compliant[2]. So it makes sense to show that
Trisquel is the primary target here.
This is also reflected in the reality as the current GNU Boot
maintainers already installed Trisquel 10 inside virtual machines
and/or containers to test this script.
[1]https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html#Ubuntu
[2]https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In PureOS 10 (byzantium) there is no lib32ncurses5-dev package anymore.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
In PureOS 10 (byzantium) there is no lib32tinfo-dev package anymore,
so running the debian dependency script fails with:
Package not found: lib32tinfo-dev
Command failed: This tool could not find any available package: No
packages were found
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Without that fix already the installation script fails on PureOS when
some packages are already installed :
# ./resources/dependencies/debian
[...]
[...] Package not found: wget
[...] Command failed: The selected packages may already be installed.
Since most other dependencies installation scripts also use
PackageKit, they are likely to behave in the same way and so we also
apply the same fix.
This was broken by the commit 0f74569af0
("dependencies: switch arch, debian, fedora35, ubuntu2004 to
packagekit").
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
The website-build code already uses guix by default. Given that it
also requires a specific Guix revision to workaround an issues with
pandoc, it's a good idea to help users easily install Guix.
PureOS Byzantium has a package for Guix 1.2.0, so if users install
that they will need to update it at least to Guix 1.4.0 to have the
same Guix commands.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Void was not migrated to PackageKit because there is no backend for
xbps in it.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
The arch, debian and ubuntu2005 packages names were respectively
checked on Parabola, PureOS byzantium and Trisquel 11.
The fedora35 and void packages were checked using the Fedora and Void
Linux online package databases.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
Having an {arch,debian,fedora35,ubuntu2004,void} GNU Boot package
looked strange. Having a dependencies package instead makes more
sense.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>
