From ce283d17ff4f3a885c49307c48f13dc7cb4c7e00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: neox <neox@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:43:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix repetition

---
 hardware_init_review.tex | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hardware_init_review.tex b/hardware_init_review.tex
index b6b81ad..6cc9460 100644
--- a/hardware_init_review.tex
+++ b/hardware_init_review.tex
@@ -285,8 +285,7 @@
         disk I/O operations through BIOS interrupts were slower compared
         to later direct access methods provided by operating systems,
         resulting in performance bottlenecks, especially for disk-intensive
-        operations. This inflexibility restricts the ability to support new
-        hardware and technologies efficiently\cite{anderson_2018}. Early BIOS
+        operations \cite{anderson_2018}. Early BIOS
         implementations also had minimal security features. There were no
         mechanisms to verify the integrity of the BIOS code or to protect
         against unauthorized modifications, leaving systems vulnerable to