docs/rtfm/intro writing + cleaning details in src/
This commit is contained in:
parent
de9b28520a
commit
dc74605850
|
@ -141,3 +141,23 @@ How can gem-graph be used to analyse and control the complexity of what it
|
|||
represents and sets in motion? This chapter introduces the gem-graph mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Gem-graph can reproduce the behavior of any cellular automata. Whatever the state
|
||||
of the cellular automaton space at a given time (n), this state can be considered
|
||||
as a gem-graph state and a rule can be written to transform it into the next
|
||||
state (n+1).
|
||||
|
||||
The difference with the cellular automaton is that this rule is not generated by
|
||||
a "micro-rule" applied cell by cell to the entire state (n). This rule must be
|
||||
written by hand and its writing requires knowledge of state (n+1).
|
||||
|
||||
Writing all the rules that describe all the transformations that have occurred
|
||||
when a cellular automaton describes a trajectory (a story) is certainly tedious,
|
||||
but it is always possible. And the number of possible histories that gem-graph
|
||||
rules can describe is limited only by the size of the space and the number of
|
||||
symbols it contains.
|
||||
|
||||
If a set of "micro-rules", each applied cell by cell to the entire state (n) of
|
||||
a cellular automaton, can produce all the possible states that the gem-graph can
|
||||
describe, the two representations can be considered to be equivalent in power.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue