coreboot-kgpe-d16/src/arch/arm/Makefile.inc

145 lines
4.9 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

################################################################################
##
## This file is part of the coreboot project.
##
ARM: Use local versions of libgcc functions instead of linking against libgcc. The flags used to compile libgcc may make it incompatible with the code it's linked against, and/or the hardware it's going to run on. Rather than try to tease the right libgcc from the compiler, lets just leave it out and use our own implementations of the necessary functions. Most of these implementations were taken from the Linux kernel, except for uldivmod.S which was taken from a CL originally written for U-Boot by Che-Liang Chiou in December of 2010. It was modified to not use the CLZ instruction on machines that don't have it, anything earlier than ARMv5. The top block was taken from an earlier version of the same CL which didn't use CLZ in that spot. The later block was written from scratch. BUG=None TEST=Built and booted into the bootblock on nyan. Ran a series of tests which divided and modded a 64 bit value by various 32 bit values which were powers of 2. Confirmed that this function was used and that the returned value was correct. Printed decimal and hex versions of some values and verified that they equaled each other. Built and booted on pit with serial enabled. BRANCH=None Original-Change-Id: I7527e28af411b7aa7f94579be95a6b352a91a224 Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/172401 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit be8c7a8f3292a7d7651b7c6dafc9a2c53afbd402) *** This second patch is cherry-picked and squashed again to *** pick up the libgcc changes that were skipped previously. arm: Move libgcc assembly macros to arch/asm.h libgcc/macros.h contains some useful assembly macros that are common in Linux kernel code and facilitate things such as unified ARM/THUMB assembly. This patch moves it to a more general place where it can be used by other code as well. BUG=None TEST=Snow still boots. Original-Change-Id: If68e8930aaafa706c54cf9a156fac826b31bb193 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/182178 Original-Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit a780670def94a969829811fa8cf257f12b88f085) *** Additional changes for stage specific builds Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Ie3e48f34ebf6fbe20c3dd76ecbcbea7844e9466e Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7322 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-10-09 03:24:10 +02:00
## Copyright (C) 2012-2013 The ChromiumOS Authors
## Copyright (C) 2012 Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
## Copyright (C) 2009-2010 coresystems GmbH
## Copyright (C) 2009 Ronald G. Minnich
##
## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
## the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
##
## This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
## but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
## MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
## GNU General Public License for more details.
##
## You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
## along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
## Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
##
###############################################################################
# ARM specific options
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM),y)
CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsets Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
CBFSTOOL_PRE1_OPTS = -m arm -s $(CONFIG_CBFS_SIZE)
CBFSTOOL_PRE_OPTS = -b 0
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
endif
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ARM),y)
subdirs-y += libgcc/
subdirs-y += armv4/ armv7/
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
stages_c = $(src)/arch/arm/stages.c
stages_o = $(obj)/arch/arm/stages.o
$(stages_o): $(stages_c) $(obj)/config.h
@printf " CC $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
$(CC_arm) -I. $(CPPFLAGS_arm) -c -o $@ $< -marm
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_ARM
###############################################################################
# bootblock
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_BOOTBLOCK_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
bootblock-y += id.S
$(obj)/arch/arm/id.bootblock.o: $(obj)/build.h
bootblock-y += boot.c
bootblock-y += stages.c
bootblock-y += eabi_compat.c
bootblock-y += memset.S
bootblock-y += memcpy.S
bootblock-y += memmove.S
ARM: Use local versions of libgcc functions instead of linking against libgcc. The flags used to compile libgcc may make it incompatible with the code it's linked against, and/or the hardware it's going to run on. Rather than try to tease the right libgcc from the compiler, lets just leave it out and use our own implementations of the necessary functions. Most of these implementations were taken from the Linux kernel, except for uldivmod.S which was taken from a CL originally written for U-Boot by Che-Liang Chiou in December of 2010. It was modified to not use the CLZ instruction on machines that don't have it, anything earlier than ARMv5. The top block was taken from an earlier version of the same CL which didn't use CLZ in that spot. The later block was written from scratch. BUG=None TEST=Built and booted into the bootblock on nyan. Ran a series of tests which divided and modded a 64 bit value by various 32 bit values which were powers of 2. Confirmed that this function was used and that the returned value was correct. Printed decimal and hex versions of some values and verified that they equaled each other. Built and booted on pit with serial enabled. BRANCH=None Original-Change-Id: I7527e28af411b7aa7f94579be95a6b352a91a224 Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/172401 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit be8c7a8f3292a7d7651b7c6dafc9a2c53afbd402) *** This second patch is cherry-picked and squashed again to *** pick up the libgcc changes that were skipped previously. arm: Move libgcc assembly macros to arch/asm.h libgcc/macros.h contains some useful assembly macros that are common in Linux kernel code and facilitate things such as unified ARM/THUMB assembly. This patch moves it to a more general place where it can be used by other code as well. BUG=None TEST=Snow still boots. Original-Change-Id: If68e8930aaafa706c54cf9a156fac826b31bb193 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/182178 Original-Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit a780670def94a969829811fa8cf257f12b88f085) *** Additional changes for stage specific builds Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Ie3e48f34ebf6fbe20c3dd76ecbcbea7844e9466e Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7322 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-10-09 03:24:10 +02:00
bootblock-y += div0.c
coreboot arm: Define function for setting cntfrq register Define functions for setting cntfrq register in arm and arm64 arch. This allows SoCs to set this register independently of the architecture being used. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully for nyan and rush Original-Change-Id: I93240419b2c012eee29a408deff34a42af943a63 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/205580 Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 768463fef5d630dec915aa0b95e7724d4a6f74b6) armv8: GPL license armv8 lib BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully. Original-Change-Id: Ibe0f09ef6704ad808cc482ffec27a4db32d7f6fd Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/250950 Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit bc115869bb0bcedbc284677ca5743b9ab40bfc7e) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: I298c3e76cb52f0876bce3dd4f54d875f62e9310a Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8468 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-06-25 00:21:03 +02:00
bootblock-y += clock.c
$(objcbfs)/bootblock.debug: $$(bootblock-objs)
@printf " LINK $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(LD_bootblock) --gc-sections -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(obj)/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/memlayout.bootblock.ld --whole-archive --start-group $(filter-out %.ld,$(bootblock-objs)) --end-group
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_BOOTBLOCK_ARM
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
###############################################################################
# verification stage
###############################################################################
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_VERSTAGE_ARM),y)
$(objcbfs)/verstage.debug: $(objgenerated)/libverstage.a $$(verstage-objs)
@printf " LINK $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(LD_verstage) --gc-sections -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(obj)/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/memlayout.verstage.ld --whole-archive --start-group $(filter-out %.ld,$(verstage-objs)) $(objgenerated)/libverstage.a --end-group
verstage-y += boot.c
verstage-y += div0.c
verstage-y += eabi_compat.c
verstage-y += memset.S
verstage-y += memcpy.S
verstage-y += memmove.S
verstage-y += stages.c
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_VERSTAGE_ARM
###############################################################################
# romstage
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
romstage-y += boot.c
romstage-y += stages.c
romstage-y += div0.c
romstage-y += eabi_compat.c
romstage-y += memset.S
romstage-y += memcpy.S
romstage-y += memmove.S
coreboot arm: Define function for setting cntfrq register Define functions for setting cntfrq register in arm and arm64 arch. This allows SoCs to set this register independently of the architecture being used. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully for nyan and rush Original-Change-Id: I93240419b2c012eee29a408deff34a42af943a63 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/205580 Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 768463fef5d630dec915aa0b95e7724d4a6f74b6) armv8: GPL license armv8 lib BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully. Original-Change-Id: Ibe0f09ef6704ad808cc482ffec27a4db32d7f6fd Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/250950 Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit bc115869bb0bcedbc284677ca5743b9ab40bfc7e) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: I298c3e76cb52f0876bce3dd4f54d875f62e9310a Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8468 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-06-25 00:21:03 +02:00
romstage-y += clock.c
rmodules_arm-y += memset.S
rmodules_arm-y += memcpy.S
rmodules_arm-y += memmove.S
rmodules_arm-y += eabi_compat.c
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
VBOOT_STUB_DEPS += $(obj)/arch/arm/eabi_compat.rmodules_arm.o
New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic bounds checking This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout (primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation cannot go missing or out of date. The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include). BUG=None TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies with ToT and looked for red flags. Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614 Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-08-21 00:29:56 +02:00
$(objcbfs)/romstage.debug: $$(romstage-objs)
@printf " LINK $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(LD_romstage) -nostdlib --gc-sections -static -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(obj)/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/memlayout.romstage.ld --whole-archive --start-group $(filter-out %.ld,$(romstage-objs)) --end-group
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_ROMSTAGE_ARM
###############################################################################
# ramstage
###############################################################################
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RAMSTAGE_ARM),y)
Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-23 19:18:48 +02:00
ramstage-y += stages.c
ramstage-y += div0.c
ramstage-$(CONFIG_COOP_MULTITASKING) += cpu.c
ramstage-y += eabi_compat.c
ramstage-y += boot.c
ramstage-y += tables.c
ramstage-y += memset.S
ramstage-y += memcpy.S
ramstage-y += memmove.S
coreboot arm: Define function for setting cntfrq register Define functions for setting cntfrq register in arm and arm64 arch. This allows SoCs to set this register independently of the architecture being used. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully for nyan and rush Original-Change-Id: I93240419b2c012eee29a408deff34a42af943a63 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/205580 Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 768463fef5d630dec915aa0b95e7724d4a6f74b6) armv8: GPL license armv8 lib BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully. Original-Change-Id: Ibe0f09ef6704ad808cc482ffec27a4db32d7f6fd Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/250950 Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit bc115869bb0bcedbc284677ca5743b9ab40bfc7e) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: I298c3e76cb52f0876bce3dd4f54d875f62e9310a Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8468 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-06-25 00:21:03 +02:00
ramstage-y += clock.c
New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic bounds checking This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout (primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation cannot go missing or out of date. The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include). BUG=None TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies with ToT and looked for red flags. Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614 Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-08-21 00:29:56 +02:00
coreboot classes: Add dynamic classes to coreboot Provide functionality to create dynamic classes based on program name and the architecture for which the program needs to be compiled/linked. define_class takes program_name and arch as its arguments and adds the program_name to classes-y to create dynamic class and compiler toolset is created for the specified arch. All the files for this program can then be added to program_name-y += .. Ensure that define_class is called before any files are added to the class. Check subdirs-y for order of directory inclusion. One such example of dynamic class is rmodules. Multiple rmodules can be used which need to be compiled for different architectures. With dynamic classes, this is possible. BUG=chrome-os-partner:30784 BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully for nyan, rush and link. Original-Change-Id: I3e3aadbe723d432b9b3500c44bcff578c98f5643 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/209379 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 242bb90d7476c2ee47d60c50ee18785edeb1a295) Some of this cherry-pick had already been committed here: commit 133096b6dc31163f59f658e15f2eb342a0de2ac6 Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: I9f5868d704c4b3251ca6f54afa634588108a788c Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8672 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-07-23 00:59:16 +02:00
rmodules_arm-y += memset.S
rmodules_arm-y += memcpy.S
rmodules_arm-y += memmove.S
rmodules_arm-y += eabi_compat.c
ramstage-srcs += $(wildcard src/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/mainboard.c)
New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic bounds checking This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout (primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation cannot go missing or out of date. The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include). BUG=None TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies with ToT and looked for red flags. Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614 Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-08-21 00:29:56 +02:00
$(objcbfs)/ramstage.debug: $$(ramstage-objs)
@printf " CC $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(LD_ramstage) -nostdlib --gc-sections -o $@ -L$(obj) -T $(obj)/mainboard/$(MAINBOARDDIR)/memlayout.ramstage.ld --whole-archive --start-group $(filter-out %.ld,$(ramstage-objs)) --end-group
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm. There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-10-01 08:00:33 +02:00
endif # CONFIG_ARCH_RAMSTAGE_ARM