GNUBoot/coreboot-kgpe-d16
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
coreboot-kgpe-d16/src/commonlib/Makefile.inc

28 lines
584 B
PHP
Raw Normal View History

coreboot: introduce commonlib Instead of reaching into src/include and re-writing code allow for cleaner code sharing within coreboot and its utilities. The additional thing needed at this point is for the utilities to provide a printk() declaration within a <console/console.h> file. That way code which uses printk() can than be mapped properly to verbosity of utility parameters. Change-Id: I9e46a279569733336bc0a018aed96bc924c07cdd Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11592 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
2015-09-08 20:34:43 +02:00
bootblock-y += mem_pool.c
verstage-y += mem_pool.c
romstage-y += mem_pool.c
ramstage-y += mem_pool.c
arch/x86: introduce postcar stage/phase Certain chipsets don't have a memory-mapped boot media so their code execution for stages prior to DRAM initialization is backed by SRAM or cache-as-ram. The postcar stage/phase handles the cache-as-ram situation where in order to tear down cache-as-ram one needs to be executing out of a backing store that isn't transient. By current definition, cache-as-ram is volatile and tearing it down leads to its contents disappearing. Therefore provide a shim layer, postcar, that's loaded into memory and executed which does 2 things: 1. Tears down cache-as-ram with a chipset helper function. 2. Loads and runs ramstage. Because those 2 things are executed out of ram there's no issue of the code's backing store while executing the code that tears down cache-as-ram. The current implementation makes no assumption regarding cacheability of the DRAM itself. If the chipset code wishes to cache DRAM for loading of the postcar stage/phase then it's also up to the chipset to handle any coherency issues pertaining to cache-as-ram destruction. Change-Id: Ia58efdadd0b48f20cfe7de2f49ab462306c3a19b Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2016-03-18 18:21:23 +01:00
postcar-y += mem_pool.c
coreboot: introduce commonlib Instead of reaching into src/include and re-writing code allow for cleaner code sharing within coreboot and its utilities. The additional thing needed at this point is for the utilities to provide a printk() declaration within a <console/console.h> file. That way code which uses printk() can than be mapped properly to verbosity of utility parameters. Change-Id: I9e46a279569733336bc0a018aed96bc924c07cdd Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11592 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
2015-09-08 20:34:43 +02:00
bootblock-y += region.c
verstage-y += region.c
romstage-y += region.c
ramstage-y += region.c
smm-y += region.c
arch/x86: introduce postcar stage/phase Certain chipsets don't have a memory-mapped boot media so their code execution for stages prior to DRAM initialization is backed by SRAM or cache-as-ram. The postcar stage/phase handles the cache-as-ram situation where in order to tear down cache-as-ram one needs to be executing out of a backing store that isn't transient. By current definition, cache-as-ram is volatile and tearing it down leads to its contents disappearing. Therefore provide a shim layer, postcar, that's loaded into memory and executed which does 2 things: 1. Tears down cache-as-ram with a chipset helper function. 2. Loads and runs ramstage. Because those 2 things are executed out of ram there's no issue of the code's backing store while executing the code that tears down cache-as-ram. The current implementation makes no assumption regarding cacheability of the DRAM itself. If the chipset code wishes to cache DRAM for loading of the postcar stage/phase then it's also up to the chipset to handle any coherency issues pertaining to cache-as-ram destruction. Change-Id: Ia58efdadd0b48f20cfe7de2f49ab462306c3a19b Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2016-03-18 18:21:23 +01:00
postcar-y += region.c
fsp1_1: move relocation algorithm to commonlib In order to support FSP 1.1 relocation within cbfstool the relocation code needs to be moved into commonlib. To that end, move it. The FSP 1.1 relocation code binds to edk2 UEFI 2.4 types unconditionally which is separate from the FSP's version binding. BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827 BRANCH=None TEST=Built and booted glados. Change-Id: Ib2627d02af99092875ff885f7cb048f70ea73856 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11772 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-10-01 00:49:04 +02:00
ramstage-$(CONFIG_PLATFORM_USES_FSP1_1) += fsp1_1_relocate.c
commonlib: Add common cbfs parsing logic to coreboot and cbfstool. To continue sharing more code between the tools and coreboot proper provide cbfs parsing logic in commonlib. A cbfs_for_each_file() function was added to allow one to act on each file found within a cbfs. cbfs_locate() was updated to use that logic. BUG=chrome-os-partner:48412 BUG=chromium:445938 BRANCH=None TEST=Utilized and booted on glados. Change-Id: I1f23841583e78dc3686f106de9eafe1adbef8c9f Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12783 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-12-15 20:33:51 +01:00
bootblock-y += cbfs.c
verstage-y += cbfs.c
romstage-y += cbfs.c
ramstage-y += cbfs.c
smm-y += cbfs.c
arch/x86: introduce postcar stage/phase Certain chipsets don't have a memory-mapped boot media so their code execution for stages prior to DRAM initialization is backed by SRAM or cache-as-ram. The postcar stage/phase handles the cache-as-ram situation where in order to tear down cache-as-ram one needs to be executing out of a backing store that isn't transient. By current definition, cache-as-ram is volatile and tearing it down leads to its contents disappearing. Therefore provide a shim layer, postcar, that's loaded into memory and executed which does 2 things: 1. Tears down cache-as-ram with a chipset helper function. 2. Loads and runs ramstage. Because those 2 things are executed out of ram there's no issue of the code's backing store while executing the code that tears down cache-as-ram. The current implementation makes no assumption regarding cacheability of the DRAM itself. If the chipset code wishes to cache DRAM for loading of the postcar stage/phase then it's also up to the chipset to handle any coherency issues pertaining to cache-as-ram destruction. Change-Id: Ia58efdadd0b48f20cfe7de2f49ab462306c3a19b Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2016-03-18 18:21:23 +01:00
postcar-y += cbfs.c
cbfs: Add LZ4 in-place decompression support for pre-RAM stages This patch ports the LZ4 decompression code that debuted in libpayload last year to coreboot for use in CBFS stages (upgrading the base algorithm to LZ4's dev branch to access the new in-place decompression checks). This is especially useful for pre-RAM stages in constrained SRAM-based systems, which previously could not be compressed due to the size requirements of the LZMA scratchpad and bounce buffer. The LZ4 algorithm offers a very lean decompressor function and in-place decompression support to achieve roughly the same boot speed gains (trading compression ratio for decompression time) with nearly no memory overhead. For now we only activate it for the stages that had previously not been compressed at all on non-XIP (read: non-x86) boards. In the future we may also consider replacing LZMA completely for certain boards, since which algorithm wins out on boot speed depends on board-specific parameters (architecture, processor speed, SPI transfer rate, etc.). BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted Oak, Jerry, Nyan and Falco. Measured boot time on Oak to be about ~20ms faster (cutting load times for affected stages almost in half). Change-Id: Iec256c0e6d585d1b69985461939884a54e3ab900 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13638 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-09-29 22:51:35 +02:00
bootblock-y += lz4_wrapper.c
verstage-y += lz4_wrapper.c
romstage-y += lz4_wrapper.c
ramstage-y += lz4_wrapper.c
arch/x86: introduce postcar stage/phase Certain chipsets don't have a memory-mapped boot media so their code execution for stages prior to DRAM initialization is backed by SRAM or cache-as-ram. The postcar stage/phase handles the cache-as-ram situation where in order to tear down cache-as-ram one needs to be executing out of a backing store that isn't transient. By current definition, cache-as-ram is volatile and tearing it down leads to its contents disappearing. Therefore provide a shim layer, postcar, that's loaded into memory and executed which does 2 things: 1. Tears down cache-as-ram with a chipset helper function. 2. Loads and runs ramstage. Because those 2 things are executed out of ram there's no issue of the code's backing store while executing the code that tears down cache-as-ram. The current implementation makes no assumption regarding cacheability of the DRAM itself. If the chipset code wishes to cache DRAM for loading of the postcar stage/phase then it's also up to the chipset to handle any coherency issues pertaining to cache-as-ram destruction. Change-Id: Ia58efdadd0b48f20cfe7de2f49ab462306c3a19b Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2016-03-18 18:21:23 +01:00
postcar-y += lz4_wrapper.c
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink