The build system includes a bunch of files into verstage that
also exist in romstage - generic drivers etc.
These create link time conflicts when trying to link both the
verstage copy and romstage copy together in a combined configuration,
so separate "stage" parts (that allow things to run) from "library" parts
(that contain the vboot specifics).
Change-Id: Ieed910fcd642693e5e89e55f3e6801887d94462f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10041
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Do not unconditially supply verstage rules for all
platforms.
Change-Id: Ic0713350aa21a9966fca828211750d25c2b6b71d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9969
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This slightly streamlines integrating the vboot2 library and
prepares for merging verstage and bootblock on selected devices.
Change-Id: I2163d1411d0c0c6bf80bce64796e1b6a5a02b802
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10004
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Without this, building with COLLECT_TIMESTAMPS fails.
Fixes a mistake during upstreaming in commit 0de8820.
Change-Id: Ie56bd38649a821f6b22a1e5dee5f50ef397035fe
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10002
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Some platforms may pass as a parameter the maskrom or vendor startup
code information when calling the bootblock.
Make sure the bootblock startup code saves this parameter for use by
coreboot. As we don't want to touch memory before caches are
initialized, save the passed in parameter in r10 for the duration of
cache initialization.
Added warning comments to help enforcing that cache initialization
code does not touch r10.
BRANCH=storm
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30623
TEST=with the rest of the patches applied see the QCA uber-sbl report
in the coreboot console output.
Change-Id: Ic6a09e8c3cf13ac4f2d12ee91c7ab41bc9aa95da
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e41584f769eb042604883275b0d0bdfbf5b0d358
Original-Change-Id: I517a79dc95040326f46f0b80ee4e74bdddde8bf4
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/255144
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9842
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch removes quite a bit of code duplication between cpu_to_le32()
and clrsetbits_le32() style macros on the different architectures. This
also syncs those macros back up to the new write32(a, v) style IO
accessor macros that are now used on ARM and ARM64.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:254862
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:444723
TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Falco, Pinky, Pit, Rambi, Ryu,
Storm and Urara. Booted on Jerry. Tried to compare binary images...
unfortunately something about the new macro notation makes the compiler
evaluate it more efficiently (not recalculating the address between the
read and the write), so this was of limited value.
Change-Id: If8ab62912c952d68a67a0f71e82b038732cd1317
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fd43bf446581bfb84bec4f2ebb56b5de95971c3b
Original-Change-Id: I7d301b5bb5ac0db7f5ff39e3adc2b28a1f402a72
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254866
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9838
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch changes the argument order for the (now temporarily unused)
write32() accessor macro (and equivalents for other lengths) from
(value, address) to (address, value) in order to conform with the
equivalent on x86. Also removes one remaining use of write32() on ARM
that slipped through since coccinelle doesn't inspect header files.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:444723
TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Pit, Ryu, Storm and Pinky.
Change-Id: Id5739b144f6a5cfd40958ea68510dcf0b89fbfa9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f02cae8b04f2042530bafc91346d11bb666aa42d
Original-Change-Id: Ia91c2c19d8444e853a2fc12590a52c2b6447a1b9
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254863
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9835
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to the
directories src/arch/arm(64)?, src/mainboard/<arm(64)-board>,
src/soc/<arm(64)-soc> and src/drivers/gic:
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write32(V, A)
+ writel(V, A)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write16(V, A)
+ writew(V, A)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write8(V, A)
+ writeb(V, A)
This replaces all uses of write{32,16,8}() with write{l,w,b}()
which is currently equivalent and much more common. This is a
preparatory step that will allow us to easier flip them all at once to
the new write32(a,v) model.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:451388
TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Pit, Ryu, Storm and Pinky.
Change-Id: I16016cd77780e7cadbabe7d8aa7ab465b95b8f09
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 93f0ada19b429b4e30d67335b4e61d0f43597b24
Original-Change-Id: I1ac01c67efef4656607663253ed298ff4d0ef89d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254862
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This is necessary to make sure that bootblock uses the default CBFS
header (as it ought to) when multiple CBFS images support is enabled.
BRANCH=storm
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938
TEST=with the rest of the patches applied storm boots all the way inot
the Linux prompt
Change-Id: I5e029d95c5cb085794c7bf5f44513b2144661e38
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 75b2c2ef6c8287db7c3e5879cacfd5dcba4391ac
Original-Change-Id: I5c352921b4c9b6a3294f4658d174e0842d2ee365
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237661
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9770
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
broadcom cygnus hangs if we clean caches by dcache_clean_invalidate_all
at bootblock entry point. this change makes startup code call
dcache_invalidate_all instead.
other boards theoretically should not be affected as long as maskrom
does not hand off execution to bootblock with dirty cache.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:36648,chrome-os-partner:36691
BRANCH=broadcom-firmware
TEST=boot cygnus b0 board, messages were printed on console:
coreboot-688aae9-dirty bootblock Mon Feb 9 13:21:02 PST 2015
starting...
Exception handlers installed.
Change-Id: I05777ca525c97bb3d7cbb5ea7e872a602dcd5a19
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 59de5328df9d0502a3b3f7c624d3e86e038de50e
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: I9b8850846b941e7e62712e90cc28ad14a68da393
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/251304
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9762
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
We've traditionally tucked the framebuffer at the end of memory (above
CBMEM) on ARM and declared it reserved through coreboot's resource
allocator. This causes depthcharge to mark this area as reserved in the
kernel's device tree, which may be necessary to avoid display corruption
on handoff but also wastes space that the OS could use instead.
Since rk3288 boards now have proper display shutdown code in
depthcharge, keeping the framebuffer memory reserved across the handoff
(and thus throughout the lifetime of the system) should no longer be
necessary. For now let's just switch the rk3288 implementation to define
it through memlayout instead, which is not communicated through the
coreboot tables and will get treated as normal memory by depthcharge.
Note that this causes it to get wiped in developer/recovery mode, which
should not be a problem because that is done in response to VbInit()
(long before any images are drawn) and 0 is the default value for a
corebootfb anyway (a black pixel).
Eventually, we might want to think about adding more memory types to
coreboot's resource system (e.g. "reserved until kernel handoff", or
something specifically for the frame buffer) to model this situation
better, and maybe merge it with memlayout somehow.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:239470
BRANCH=veyron
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34713
TEST=Booted Jerry, noticed that 'free' now displays 0x7f000 more bytes
than before (curiously not 0x80000 bytes, I guess there's some alignment
waste in the kernel somewhere). Made sure the memory map output from
coreboot looks as expected, there's no visible display corruption in
developer/recovery mode and the 'cbmem' utility still works.
Change-Id: I12b7bfc1b7525f5a08cb7c64f0ff1b174df252d4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 10afdba54dd5d680acec9cb3fe5b9234e33ca5a2
Original-Change-Id: I1950407d3b734e2845ef31bcef7bc59b96c2ea03
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/240819
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9732
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
this change defines stage_entry as a weak symbol so that a board
can implement custom stage entry code.
BUG=none
BRANCH=tot
TEST=built all current boards. booted cosmos p1.
Change-Id: If8f6945ecdc5047558bb6359aa997867e36f33b9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 86d5008981d0b01652907baab47a476d784a2ceb
Original-Change-Id: Ib43158c4013e6393d86a9aef37cf444a48b9fc79
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/238021
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9721
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Commit 54229a7 (arm: Fix checkstack() to use correct stack size) didn't
quite hit the mark. Due to the crazy way our Kconfig includes work, It
accidentally set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to 0 even on architectures that need
it.
This patch fixes the issue by moving everything back to a single entry
in src/Kconfig, making sure we end up with the intended numbers on all
architectures.
BRANCH=None
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34750
TEST=Built for Pinky, Urara, Falco and Ryu. Confirmed that the generated
.config contained CONFIG_STACK_SIZE=0x0 for the former two, and
CONFIG_STACK_SIZE=0x1000 for the latter.
Original-Change-Id: Ib18561925aafe7c74e6c4f0b10b55000a785e144
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/236753
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c64b127e163f98162f3f7195b6ed09bd5a4b77c4)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2c747b04760bc97f43523596640bfb15317e5730
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9696
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
checkstack() runs at the end of ramstage to warn about stack overflows,
and it assumes that CONFIG_STACK_SIZE is always the size of the stack to
check. This is only true for systems that bring up multiprocessing in
ramstage and assign a separate stack for each core, like x86 and ARM64.
Other architectures like ARM and MIPS (for now) don't touch secondary
CPUs at all and currently don't look like they'll ever need to, so they
generally stay on the same (SRAM-based) stack they have been on since
their bootblock.
This patch tries to model that difference by making these architectures
explicitly set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to zero, and using that as a cue to
assume the whole (_estack - _stack) area in checkstack() instead. Also
adds a BUG() to the stack overflow check, since that is currently just
as non-fatal as the BIOS_ERR message (despite the incorrect "SYSTEM
HALTED" output) but a little more easy to spot. Such a serious failure
should not drown out in all the normal random pieces of lower case boot
spam (also, I was intending to eventually have a look at assert() and
BUG() to hopefully make them a little more useful/noticeable if I ever
find the time for it).
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, noticed it no longer complains about stack overflows.
Built Falco, Ryu and Urara.
Change-Id: I6826e0ec24201d4d83c5929b281828917bc9abf4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 54229a725e8907b84a105c04ecea33b8f9b91dd4
Original-Change-Id: I49f70bb7ad192bd1c48e077802085dc5ecbfd58b
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/235894
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Since we can now reduce our vboot2 work buffer by 4K, we can use all
that hard-earned space for the CBMEM console instead (and 4K are
unfortunately barely enough for all the stuff we dump with vboot2).
Also add console_init() and exception_init() to the verstage for
CONFIG_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE, which was overlooked before (our model
requires those functions to be called again at the beginning of every
stage... even though some consoles like UARTs might not need it, others
like the CBMEM console do). In the !RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE case, this is
expected to be done by the platform-specific verstage entry wrapper, and
already in place for the only implementation we have for now (tegra124).
(Technically, there is still a bug in the case where EARLY_CONSOLE is
set but BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE isn't, since both verstage and romstage would
run init_console_ptr() as if they were there first, so the romstage
overwrites the verstage's output. I don't think it's worth fixing that
now, since EARLY_CONSOLE && !BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE is a pretty pointless
use-case and I think we should probably just get rid of the
CONFIG_BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE option eventually.)
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky.
Change-Id: I87914df3c72f0262eb89f337454009377a985497
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 85486928abf364c5d5d1cf69f7668005ddac023c
Original-Change-Id: Id666cb7a194d32cfe688861ab17c5e908bc7760d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/232614
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
We have known for a while that the old x86 model of calling init_timer()
in ramstage doesn't make sense on other archs (and is questionable in
general), and finally removed it with CL:219719. However, now timer
initialization is completely buried in the platform code, and it's hard
to ensure it is done in time to set up timestamps. For three out of four
non-x86 SoC vendors we have brought up for now, the timers need some
kind of SoC-specific initialization.
This patch reintroduces init_timer() as a weak function that can be
overridden by platform code. The call in ramstage is restricted to x86
(and should probably eventually be removed from there as well), and
other archs should call them at the earliest reasonable point in their
bootblock. (Only changing arm for now since arm64 and mips bootblocks
are still in very early state and should sync up to features in arm once
their requirements are better understood.) This allows us to move
timestamp_init() into arch code, so that we can rely on timestamps
being available at a well-defined point and initialize our base value as
early as possible. (Platforms who know that their timers start at zero
can still safely call timestamp_init(0) again from platform code.)
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, Blaze and Storm, compiled Daisy and Pit.
Change-Id: I1b064ba3831c0c5b7965b1d88a6f4a590789c891
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ffaebcd3785c4ce998ac1536e9fdd46ce3f52bfa
Original-Change-Id: Iece1614b7442d4fa9ca981010e1c8497bdea308d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/234062
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9606
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Some projects (like ChromeOS) put more content than described by CBFS
onto their image. For top-aligned images (read: x86), this has
traditionally been achieved with a CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which denotes the
area actually managed by CBFS, as opposed to ROM_SIZE) that is used to
calculate the CBFS entry start offset. On bottom-aligned boards, many
define a fake (smaller) ROM_SIZE for only the CBFS part, which is not
consistently done and can be an issue because ROM_SIZE is expected to be
a power of two.
This patch changes all non-x86 boards to describe their actual
(physical) ROM size via one of the BOARD_ROMSIZE_KB_xxx options as a
mainboard Kconfig select (which is the correct place to declare
unchangeable physical properties of the board). It also changes the
cbfstool create invocation to use CBFS_SIZE as the -s parameter for
those architectures, which defaults to ROM_SIZE but gets overridden for
special use cases like ChromeOS. This has the advantage that cbfstool
has a consistent idea of where the area it is responsible for ends,
which offers better bounds-checking and is needed for a subsequent fix.
Also change the FMAP offset to default to right behind the (now
consistently known) CBFS region for non-x86 boards, which has emerged as
a de-facto standard on those architectures and allows us to reduce the
amount of custom configuration. In the future, the nightmare that is
ChromeOS's image build system could be redesigned to enforce this
automatically, and also confirm that it doesn't overwrite any space used
by CBFS (which is now consistently defined as the file size of
coreboot.rom on non-x86).
CQ-DEPEND=CL:231576,CL:231475
BRANCH=None
BUG=chromium:422501
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky.
Change-Id: I89aa5b30e25679e074d4cb5eee4c08178892ada6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e707c67c69599274b890d0686522880aa2e16d71
Original-Change-Id: I4fce5a56a8d72f4c4dd3a08c129025f1565351cc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229974
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9619
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
On most platforms, enabling the console and exception handlers are
amongst the very first things you want to do, as they help you see
what's going on and debug errors in other early init code. However, most
ARM boards require some small amount of board-specific initialization
(pinmuxing, maybe clocks) to get the UART running, which is why
bootblock_mainboard_init() (and with it almost all of the actual
bootblock code) always had to run before console initialization for now.
This patch introduces an explicit bootblock_mainboard_early_init() hook
for only that part of initialization that absolutely needs to run before
console output. The other two hooks for SoC and mainboard are moved
below console_init(). This model has already proven its worth before in
the tegra124 and tegra132 custom bootblocks.
BRANCH=None
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32123
TEST=Booted on Pinky. Compiled for Daisy, Storm and Ryu.
Change-Id: I510c58189faf0c08c740bcc3b5a654f81f892464
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f58e84a2fc1c9951e9c4c65cdec1dbeb6a20d597
Original-Change-Id: I4257b5a8807595140e8c973ca04e68ea8630bf9a
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231941
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9603
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
When the i-cache is on and the d-cache is off, the L1 i-cache is still
fetching information through L2 cache.
Since L2 cache is never invalidated, it has stale information.
BRANCH=storm
BUG=none
TEST=Resolves the invalidate data fetch from i-cache while jumping from
bootblock to romstage.
Change-Id: Ibaca1219be2e40ce5bbbd1c124863d0ea71d0466
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: a13e20f9b242d8193dcb314a2bdc708c6bdfea51
Original-Change-Id: I252682d372bd505f525f075461b327e4bcf70a1a
Original-Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepad@codeaurora.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/236422
Original-Reviewed-by: Trevor Bourget <tbourget@codeaurora.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9587
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
this change sets the stack pointer to the value specified in
memlayout.ld before jumping to the bootblock.
BUG=none
BRANCH=ToT
TEST=Built cosmos and all other current boards.
Change-Id: Ic1b790f27bce431124ba70cc2d3d3607c537564b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: d50fd02db8bf10147fd808f3030e6297b9ca0aad
Original-Change-Id: I4bb8cea7435d2a0e2c1ced050c3366d2e636cb8a
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/225420
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9384
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
this adds an entry point jumping to main for the bootblock.
BUG=None
BRANCH=ToT
TEST=Built coreboot for cosmos
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I1c9ea6ba63a1058e09613d969fe00308260037be
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 662d0083f25008b55b9bc5fbce9e30e6b80c2c65
Original-Change-Id: I74f2f5e3b3961ab54a7913e6b3a3ab0e6fd813a3
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/225205
Original-Commit-Queue: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9382
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Paging code is tricky and figuring out what is wrong with it can be a
pain. This patch tries to ease the burden by giving a little more
information for prefetch and data aborts, dumping the Instruction Fault
Address Register (IFAR), Instruction Fault Status Register (IFSR) and
Auxiliary Instruction Fault Status Register (AIFSR) or the respective
Data registers. These contain additional information about the cause of
the abort (internal/external, write or read, fault subtype, etc.) and
the faulting address.
BUG=None
TEST=I have read through enough imprecise asynchronous external abort
reports with this patch that I learned the bit pattern by heart.
Change-Id: If1850c4a6df29b1195714ed0bdf025e51220e8ab
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: bf3b4924121825a5ceef7e5c14b7b307d01f8e9c
Original-Change-Id: I56a0557d4257f40b5b30c559c84eaf9b9f729099
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223784
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9345
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Remember the XN bit? The one we had so much fun with on Nyan (LPAE)
because not setting it allows random instruction prefetches to device
memory that hang the system every few thousand boots? Thankfully, we had
always been setting it in the non-LPAE MMU code already...
"When the XN bit is 1, a Permission fault is generated if the processor
attempts to execute an instruction fetched from the corresponding memory
region. However, when using the Short-descriptor translation table
format, the fault is generated only if the access is to memory in the
Client domain, see Domains[...]" - ARM A.R.M. section B3.7.2
Oops. This patch changes our Domain Access Control Register (DACR) to
set domain 0 (the only one we are using) to Client. This means that
access permissions (AP[2:0] bits) become enforced, but they are already
set to full access (0b011). It also means that non-LPAE systems will not
be allowed to execute from DCACHE_OFF memory with enabled MMU anymore.
As far as I can see, Veyron_Pinky has been the only board that does
that.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32118
TEST=Booted Veyron_Pinky with MMU in the bootblock, saw hangs that look
like spurious prefetches and confirmed that this patch fixes them.
Change-Id: I81c00743f938924a5dc8825389fe512a069b77db
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: cbc96db296a41ae700371a8515a1179c142f58e7
Original-Change-Id: I30676a5bfe12d516e5f910f51ee6854f6e5be557
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223783
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9343
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch adds an mmu_config_range_kb() function, which can set memory
types at the 4KB level by chaining a fine-grained page table to an
existing superpage entry. It is only intended for special cases where
this level of precision is really necessary and therefore comes with a
few practical limitations (the area for each invocation must be confined
within a single superpage, and you are not allowed to remap the same
region with mmu_config_range() again later). Since the fine-grained page
tables need some space, boards intending to use this feature must define
a TTB_SUBTABLES() region in their memlayout.ld.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32848
TEST=Booted both Veyron_Pinky (normal) and Nyan_Blaze (LPAE), ensured
that they still work. Checksummed the page tables with and without this
patch, confirmed that they end up equal. Hacked in some subtable test
entries, hexdumped all tables and manually confirmed that they look as
expected.
Change-Id: I8c3eb7c2eb9c82e2abc5f2c0dda91f5b2eee7023
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2f13e60cf5509b9a63fb7b8d84846daf889dc1b7
Original-Change-Id: Iedf7ca435ae337ead85115200d6987fb0d4828d7
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223781
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
I overlooked the macro name change from the Kconfig option.
'ARM' and 'V4' should not be separated by a '_'.
Change-Id: I8bf0d851e6fd5b5cfc0aa29af2246540c8cb1399
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
... so uint32_t is known by the time it's used.
Change-Id: I7281e869ce2e00165a0e21bc017aa6c0e27827b9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9333
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
With kconfig understanding wildcards, we don't need
Kconfig files that just include other Kconfig files
anymore.
Change-Id: I7584e675f78fcb4ff1fdb0731e340533c5bc040d
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9298
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
This allows combining and simplifying linker scripts.
This is inspired by the commit listed below, but rewritten to match
upstream, and split in smaller pieces to keep intent clear.
Change-Id: Ie5c11bd8495a399561cefde2f3e8dd300f4feb98
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Based-On-Change-Id: I50af7dacf616e0f8ff4c43f4acc679089ad7022b
Based-On-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Based-On-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219170
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9303
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Instead of having different structures for loading
ramstage and payload align to using struct prog.
This also removes arch_payload_run() in favor of
the prog_run() interface.
Change-Id: I31483096094eacc713a7433811cd69cc5621c43e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8849
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
The prog_run() function abstracts away what is required
for running a given program. Within it, there are 2
calls: 1. platform_prog_run() and 2. arch_prog_run().
The platform_prog_run() allows for a chipset to intercept
a program that will be run. This allows for CPU switching
as currently needed in t124 and t132.
Change-Id: I22a5dd5bfb1018e7e46475e47ac993a0941e2a8c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8846
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program
loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more
complicated execution paths such as running a program
on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently
t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow
on patches will allow the platform to decide how to
execute a particular program.
Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's
already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting
all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be
fixed.
Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
It's an unfortunate side effect of our different-archs-per-stage
mechanism that all src/arch/*/Kconfig files are always parsed with no
if blocks to exclude them if they're not relevant. This makes it very
easy to accidentally rely on a Kconfig default set by a totally
different and not applying architecture.
This patch moves a few Kconfigs from ARM and X86 that leaked out like
this into a common Kconfig file for clarity. It also gives ARM64 its
own BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM mechanism so that it doesn't leech off the ARM one
(currently not used by any board).
In the future, we should maybe prefix all options in the arch/*/Kconfig
files with the architecture name (such as X86_BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL and
ARM_LPAE are already doing), to make it more apparent when they are used
in the wrong place.
BUG=None
TEST=None (tested together with dependent changes)
Change-Id: I3e8bb3dfbb2c4edada621ce16d130bd7387d4eb8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 5528aa9252cdf711af3c160da387c6a7bebe9e76
Original-Change-Id: Ieb2d79bae6c6800be0f93ca3489b658008b1dfae
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219171
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9235
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
The ARM SMP feature was added a long time ago and has never really been
used by anyone since. We are still always compiling cpu_info() even
though we don't use it, and it makes some dangerous assumptions about
stack alignment that are not guaranteed anywhere.
I'm planning to change the way the stack boundaries are defined. Rather
than trying to work that into this unsafe, unused and hard to test
feature, I think we should just seal it off with police tape and make
sure that if anyone ever tries to use it again (which currently seems
unlikely), they get forced to do their due diligence on making sure it
works as intended.
BUG=None
TEST=Compiled Veyron_Pinky.
Change-Id: Id25545cab88f29200c7672ef02c7804f0ac26399
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 5b517fc46b030a6e50ef2f5e4d4a449b98ce16c6
Original-Change-Id: I8a60bd30e8b27a22bb3da68ca84daea99424dee9
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219680
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9222
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This is inspired by the commit listed below, but rewritten to match
upstream, and split in smaller pieces to keep intent clear.
Change-Id: I8a5dc66d8c0dc4ccdb6dc3d66b8cdbf50dc976ca
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Based-On-Change-Id: I50af7dacf616e0f8ff4c43f4acc679089ad7022b
Based-On-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Based-On-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219170
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9111
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
There are some ARMv8/ARMv4 SoC where the ARMv8 part needs to be
SMP aware but the ARMv4 part does not.
Until we need real SMP on ARMv4, work around that situation
with stub defines.
Change-Id: Iec5b4302b19c17fe2b3f677b84a8edf4b4902946
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9046
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
With CONFIG_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE false, the verstage loads the romstage over
the bootblock, then exits to the romstage. this is necessary for some SOC
(e.g. tegra124) which runs the bootblock on a different architecture.
With CONFIG_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE true, the verstage returns to the bootblock.
Then, the bootblock loads the romstage over the verstage and exits to the
romstage. this is probably necessary for some SOC (e.g. rockchip) which does not
have SRAM big enough to fit the verstage and the romstage at the same time.
BUG=none
TEST=Built Blaze with USE=+/-vboot2. Ran faft on Blaze.
BRANCH=none
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: I673945c5e21afc800d523fbb25d49fdc83693544
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/212365
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Note: This purposefully is probably broken in vendorcode/google/chromeos
as I'm just trying to set a base for dropping more patches in. The vboot
paths will have to change from how they are currently constructed.
(cherry picked from commit 4fa17395113d86445660091413ecb005485f8014)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I9117434ce99695f9b7021a06196d864f180df5c9
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8881
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
It's helpful to view program size by inspecting the symbols.
_start and _end exist on romstage and ramstage. In order to
be consistent add _end for bootblock too.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and noted bootblock has _end symbol.
Change-Id: I06634b317e957e8271bf32530a56b5541c79b9ee
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: b4ac926b30749d22e90a6f12ebac52107e241526
Original-Change-Id: I7f0b4dd4078c7d23c70949563b4c3f4df9e66142
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/210832
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8824
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Instead of sprinkling the cbfs calls around (as well as getting
return values incorrect) use the common run_romstage() to perform
the necessary work to load and run romstage.
Change-Id: Id59f47febf5122cb3ee60f9741cfb58cb60ccab5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8711
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Instead of two headers for payload and ramstage loading
combine the 2 files into one. This also allows for easier
refactoring by keeping header files consistent.
Change-Id: I4a6dffb78ad84c78e6e96c886d361413f9b4a17d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8708
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The GCC 4.9.2 update showed that the boot_state_init_entry
structures were being padded and assumed to be aligned in to an
increased size. The bootstate scheduler for static entries,
boot_state_schedule_static_entries(), was then calculating the
wrong values within the array. To fix this just use a pointer to
the boot_state_init_entry structure that needs to be scheduled.
In addition to the previous issue noted above, the .bs_init
section was sitting in the read only portion of the image while
the fields within it need to be writable. Also, the
boot_state_schedule_static_entries() was using symbol comparison
to terminate a loop which in C can lead the compiler to always
evaluate the loop at least once since the language spec indicates
no 2 symbols can be the same value.
Change-Id: I6dc5331c2979d508dde3cd5c3332903d40d8048b
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8699
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Patrick Georgi