the prefix was introduced in the early v2 tree many years ago
because our old build system "newconfig" could not handle two files with
the same name in different paths like /path/to/usb.c and
/another/path/to/usb.c correctly. Only one of the files would end up
being compiled into the final image.
Since Kconfig (actually since shortly before we switched to Kconfig) we
don't suffer from that problem anymore. So we could drop the sb700_
prefix from all those filenames (or, the <componentname>_ prefix in general)
- makes it easier to fork off a new chipset
- makes it easier to diff against other chipsets
- storing redundant information in filenames seems wrong
Signed-off-by: <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6149 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
coreboot is direct. This patch does it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5586 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5266 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* SATA initialization.
* USB initialization.
* HDA initialization.
* LPC initialization.
* IDE initialization.
* SMBUS initialization.
Note:
1. I tried to add the description of every step to the code. For example,
if it is made based on rpr, section 2.4.5, I will pasted the words
from 2.4.5 to the c code. But the document I worked with might be
different with the most updated one. A new section has been added and
the 2.4.5 might be changed to 2.5.5. That migh lead to confusing. I
correct every comment if I met one. But I have to confess that I am so
reluctant to find out everyone. I believe it will be correct in the long
run.
2. I only test the SATA port 0-3. The ports 4, 5 are "PATA emulations".
I am confused about it.
3. This patch is not only about SB700. Actually it should be
SB7x0. But I dont think it is nice to change everything to
SB7x0. It is ugly, isn't it. As far as I know, they all use the
same code with revision checking. If you guys think it is
appropriate, please modify it to sb7x0.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5218 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
