2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Vadim Bendebury
|
0b341b341d |
ipq/arm: Redesign hooks for bootblock
The following patches had to be squashed to properly build all the different ARM boards. ipq8064: storm: re-arrange bootblock initialization The recent addition of the storm bootblock initialization broke compilation of Exynos platforms. The SOC specific code needs to be kept in the respective source files, not in the common CPU code. As of now coreboot does not provide a separate SOC initialization API. In general it makes sense to invoke SOC initialization from the board initialization code, as the board knows what SOC it is running on. Presently all what's need initialization on 8064 is the timer. This patch adds the SOC initialization framework for 8064 and moves there the related code. BUG=chrome-os-partner:27784 TEST=manual . nyan_big, peach_pit, and storm targets build fine now. Original-Change-Id: Iae9a021f8cbf7d009770b02d798147a3e08420e8 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197835 (cherry picked from commit 3ea7307b531b1a78c692e4f71a0d81b32108ebf0) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> arm: Redesign mainboard and SoC hooks for bootblock This patch makes some slight changes to the way bootblock_cpu_init() and bootblock_mainboard_init() are used on ARM. Experience has shown that nearly every board needs either one or both of these hooks, so having explicit Kconfigs for them has become unwieldy. Instead, this patch implements them as a weak symbol that can be overridden by mainboard/SoC code, as the more recent arm64_soc_init() is also doing. Since the whole concept of a single "CPU" on ARM systems has kinda died out, rename bootblock_cpu_init() to bootblock_soc_init(). (This had already been done on Storm/ipq806x, which is now adjusted to directly use the generic hook.) Also add a proper license header to bootblock_common.h that was somehow missing. Leaving non-ARM32 architectures out for now, since they are still using the really old and weird x86 model of directly including a file. These architectures should also eventually be aligned with the cleaner ARM32 model as they mature. BRANCH=None BUG=chrome-os-partner:32123 TEST=Booted on Pinky. Compiled for Storm and confirmed in the disassembly that bootblock_soc_init() is still compiled in and called right before the (now no-op) bootblock_mainboard_init(). Original-Change-Id: I57013b99c3af455cc3d7e78f344888d27ffb8d79 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231940 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 257aaee9e3aeeffe50ed54de7342dd2bc9baae76) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Id055fe60a8caf63a9787138811dc69ac04dfba57 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7879 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> |
|
|
Gabe Black
|
51edd54738 |
ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm.
There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) |
Renamed from src/arch/armv7/include/bootblock_common.h (Browse further)