Currently, we're building support for all memory types into every board,
and letting the linker remove anything that isn't needed. This is okay,
but it'd be nice to be able to build in just what's actually needed.
This change adds options to specify both what is used and what is not.
By doing it that way, the default values don't change, but platforms can
start removing support for memory types that are not needed. When all
platforms (SoCs, CPUs and/or Northbridge chips) specify what memory
types they support, the defaults on the options to use a particular
memory type can be set to no, and the options not to use a memory type
can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I07c98a702e0d67c5ad7bd9b8a4ff24c9288ab569
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68992
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
add functions to check whether a device is enabled pci
device or a pci device on a specific bus number.
TEST: compile and qemu run successfully
Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I3257c8404017372f6cdd9f6cf9453502447343a0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68101
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
use is_enabled_cpu() on cycles over device list to check
whether the current device is enabled cpu.
TEST: compile test and qemu run successfully with coreinfo
payload
Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Change-Id: If64bd18f006b6f5fecef4f606c1df7d3a4d42883
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67797
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <inforichland@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Add function defs and prototypes of functions checking whether
a device is {a cpu,an enabled cpu}
TEST: compile test and qemu executed successfully with
coreinfo payload
Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Iabc0e59d604ae4572921518a8dad47dc3d149f81
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67502
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Most of these changes are suggested by clang-format(13.0-54) tool on
Debian testing.
Change-Id: I9bf5f516db4f12ffe1e9a714c7a8ae179c12b149
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64780
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Refer to PCI Express Base rev6.0 v1.0, 4.2.7 Link Training and Status
State Rules, Lane Error Status is normal to record the error when link
training. To make sure Lane Error Status is correct in OS runtime,
add a Kconfig PCIEXP_LANE_ERR_STAT_CLEAR that clears the PCIe lane error
status register at the end of PCIe link training.
Test=On Crater Lake, lspci -vvv shows
bb:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352a (rev 03)
(prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Capabilities: [a30 v1] Secondary PCI Express
LnkCtl3: LnkEquIntrruptEn- PerformEqu-
LaneErrStat: LaneErr at lane: 0
Signed-off-by: Wilson Chou <Wilson.Chou@quantatw.com>
Change-Id: I6344223636409d8fc25e365a6375fc81e69f41a5
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67264
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
Add the missing spaces to two log message, like the one below.
WARNING: Device PCI: 03:00.0 requests a BAR with34 bits of address space, which coreboot is notconfigured to hand out, truncating to 29 bits
Change-Id: If933d8fb0db5b58ff12f043cc73172a3f6ffc624
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67370
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
The top-down allocation feature was merged prematurely before
platforms that don't report their resources correctly were fixed.
Let's turn it off by default.
Change-Id: I982e6d7355b9e689de10357d6c16ed718705270e
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67328
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
This reverts commit 117e436115.
Depends on top-down allocation to keep the behavior to place
hot-plug reservations above 4G. The latter was merged prema-
turely, though.
Change-Id: I5721cb84b29fc42240dff94f49a94461d88e7fbc
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67329
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
We currently have two competing mechanisms to limit the placement of
resources:
1. the explicit `.limit` field of a resource, and
2. the IORESOURCE_ABOVE_4G flag.
This makes the resource allocator unnecessarily complex. Ideally, we
would always reduce the `.limit` field if we want to "pin" a specific
resource below 4G. However, as that's not done across the tree yet,
we will use the _absence_ of the IORESOURCE_ABOVE_4G flag as a hint
to implicitly lower the `limit` of a resource. In this patch, this
is done inside the effective_limit() function that hides the flag
from the rest of the allocator.
To automatically place resources above 4G if their limit allows it,
we have to allocate from top down. Hence, we disable the prompt for
RESOURCE_ALLOCATION_TOP_DOWN if resources above 4G are requested.
One implication of the changes is that we act differently when a
cold-plugged device reports a prefetchable resource with 32-bit
limit. Before this change, we would fail to allocate the resource.
After this change, it forces everything on the same root port below
the 4G line.
A possible solution to get completely rid of the IORESOURCE_ABOVE_4G
flag would be rules to place resources of certain devices below 4G.
For instance, the primary VGA device and storage and HID devices
could be made available to a payload that can only address 32 bits.
For now, effective_limit() provides us enough abstraction as if the
`limit` would be the only variable to consider. With this, we get
rid of all the special handling of above 4G resources during phase 2
of the allocator. Which saves us about 20% of the code :D
Change-Id: I4c7fcd1f5146f6cc287bd3aa5582da55bc5d6955
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65413
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The `IORESOURCE_ABOVE_4G` flag was only explicitly set for our dummy
device that reserves resources behind a hotplug port. The current re-
source allocator implicitly extends this to all devices below the port,
including real ones. Let's make that explicit, so future changes to the
allocator can't break this rule.
Change-Id: Id4c90b60682cf5c8949cde25362d286625b3e953
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66719
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Add option to resource allocator v4 that restores the top-down
allocation approach at the domain level.
This makes it easier to handle 64-bit resources natively. With
the top-down approach, resources that can be placed either above
or below 4G would be placed above, to save precious space below
the 4G boundary.
Change-Id: Iaf463d3e6b37d52e46761d8e210034fded58a8a4
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41957
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Some devices require that several bytes are written with a single I2C
write command. Extend the i2c_bus interface functions and add both, read
and write for more than one byte at a defined byte offset.
Change-Id: I0eec2e1d4185170f02b4ab35aa6546dc69569303
Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67098
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Mario Scheithauer <mario.scheithauer@siemens.com>
It seems pass 1 and 2 were inconsistent. The first would account for
resources with a limit of 0 even though the second can't assign anything
for them.
Change-Id: I86fb8edc8d4b3c9310517e07f29f73a6b859a7c4
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65402
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
If we have a PCIe root port without `ops_pci` or without
`get_ltr_max_latencies`, the parent device wouldn't be PCI.
Hence, check for a PCI path early.
Change-Id: I358cb6756750bb10d0a23ab7133b917bfa25988b
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66845
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
As the frequency field in the SMBIOS type 17 table is deprecated,
we need to provide the maximum and configured speed in MT/s. Add
a method to convert from frequency to MT/s using a lookup table.
BUG=b:239000826
TEST=Build and verify with other patches in train
Change-Id: I0402b33a667f7d72918365a6a79b13c5b1719c0d
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
The PCIe spec explicitly states that the bottom-two bits of the next
offset are reserved for future use and should be masked. We can also
change the loop condition to avoid wrong offsets below 0x100 (exten-
ded capabilities always reside in the extended config space).
The whole patch series was tested on Google Samus and keeps the L1ss
configuration of the WiFi device in tact.
Change-Id: I0b622a0ce0a4a1127d266226ade0ec1e66e9fb79
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66459
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add some inline functions for the bit-wise operations, change the loop
body to an if-bail-out style and remove stateful variables.
Change-Id: Ia8db915f375737064e3486d313383d9b6c3eb2b8
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66458
Reviewed-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Keeping these checks in generic code seems rather dangerous.
In theory, it could lead to endless loops even for compliant
devices, if we accidentally detect arbitrary register contents
as capability and use them as a pointer to another one. Not
to forget that the register reads can have side effects.
All users of this `cafe` have been converted to use
pciexp_find_ext_vendor_cap().
Change-Id: I70d21534e04282a4156572a290b83c46be085e0c
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66456
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
We have this quirk in our tree since the introduction of L1-substate
support[1]. The way we searched for this capability was rather crude:
We simply assumed that it would show up in the first data word of
another capability.
As it turned out that it is actually a proper vendor-specific capa-
bility that we are looking for, we can drop some of the mystic code.
This was confirmed to work on the device that was originally used
during development, Google/Samus.
[1] commit 31c6e632cf (PCIe: Add L1 Sub-State support.)
Change-Id: I886fb96e9a92387bc0e2a7feb746f7842cee5476
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66455
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Vendors can choose to add non-standard capabilities inside a
Vendor-Specific Extended Capability. These are identified by
the Extended Capability ID 0x0b.
Change-Id: Idd6dd0e98bd53b19077afdd4c402114578bec966
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66454
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Move the `offset` parameter into pciexp_find_extended_cap(). If it's
called with `0`, we start a new search. If it's an existing offset,
we continue the search.
This makes it easier to search for multiple occurences of a capa-
bility in a single loop.
Change-Id: I80115372a82523b90460d97f0fd0fa565c3f56cb
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66453
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
If we already encountered the last extended capability in the
list, we'd call pciexp_get_ext_cap_offset() with `offset == 0`.
So it also needs to check if the passed offset is valid.
As there were no callers of pciexp_find_next_extended_cap()
yet, pciexp_get_ext_cap_offset() was only ever called with
`PCIE_EXT_CAP_OFFSET`.
Change-Id: I155c4691a34ff16661919913a3446fa915ac535e
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66452
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
It's possible that some BARs are not got their resource successfully
mapped, e.g. when these BARs are too large to fit into the available
MMIO window.
Not assigned resources might be with base address as 0x0. During
global resource search, these not assigned resources should not be
picked up.
One example is MTRR calculation. MTRR calculation is based on global
memory ranges. An unmapped BAR whose base is left as 0x0 will be
mistakenly picked up and recognized as an UC range starting from 0x0.
Change-Id: I9c3ea302058914f38a13a7739fc28d7f94527704
Signed-off-by: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66347
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
coreboot uses TianoCore interchangeably with EDK II, and whilst the
meaning is generally clear, it's not the payload it uses. EDK II is
commonly written as edk2.
coreboot builds edk2 directly from the edk2 repository. Whilst it
can build some components from edk2-platforms, the target is still
edk2.
[1] tianocore.org - "Welcome to TianoCore, the community supporting"
[2] tianocore.org - "EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform
firmware development environment for the UEFI and UEFI Platform
Initialization (PI) specifications."
Signed-off-by: Sean Rhodes <sean@starlabs.systems>
Change-Id: I4de125d92ae38ff8dfd0c4c06806c2d2921945ab
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65820
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Looking into pciexp_get_ext_cap_offset() it seems a little hackish
and prone to endless loops. Either it should limit the loop or bail
out when pci_read_config32() returns 0xffffffff, meaning "Unsupported
Requests".
This commit fixes an endless loop when the queried PCIe device is
downstream of a legacy PCI bus which doesn't support extended config
space, thus pci_read_config32() will return 0xffffffff, for example,
the combination below with CONFIG_PCIEXP_SUPPORT_RESIZABLE_BARS
enabled.
TEST=Build and boot to OS in ASUS P8C WS with the following
peripherals and CONFIG_PCIEXP_SUPPORT_RESIZABLE_BARS enabled:
00:1c.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series
Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 5 [8086:1e18] (rev c4)
00:1c.4/00.0 SATA controller [0106]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
88SE9170 PCIe 2.0 x1 2-port SATA 6 Gb/s Controller [1b4b:9170]
(rev 13)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge
[8086:244e] (rev a4)
00:1e.0/00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: PLX Technology, Inc. PEX 8111 PCI
Express-to-PCI Bridge [10b5:8111] (rev 21)
00:1e.0/03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT6306/7/8 [Fire II(M)] IEEE 1394 OHCI Controller [1106:3044]
(rev c0)
00:1e.0/00.0/00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros AR93xx
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:0030] (rev 01)
with 00:1c.4/00.0 being successfully tuned with pciexp_tune_dev(), and
00: 1e.0/00.0/00.0 not tuned as expected.
Change-Id: Ibb92548c47288b40e851fcc0a8a37937e8bdbf3c
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66439
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Some PCI capabilities should only be enabled if it is available not
only on a device, but also all bridge upstream of it. Checking only
the device and the bridge just above it may not be enough.
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Change-Id: I1237d3b4b86dd0ae5eb586e3c3c407362e6ca291
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66383
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
'parent_cap' should be found from 'parent' instead of 'dev'.
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Change-Id: I99dab83d90287ca924d30dc4aeac0ff96e877e5c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66385
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Use 0x016llx to print device resource info so that both 64bit and
32bit resources could be displayed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Gang Chen <gang.c.chen@intel.com>
Change-Id: I0ec4c47cca4a09ceb7dc929efaa5630b1f9df81c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
We actually want the bus driver to process the 1 zero-length write
we are passing. So set the count to 1.
Change-Id: I5a41abb68c27a83715b6baec91ece9fa90b66a8c
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66337
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com>
As we walk the results of largest_resource(), we actually know that the
condition can only be true for the first return value. So there's no
need to keep track of the first loop iteration.
Change-Id: I6d6b99e38706c0c70f3570222d97a1d71ba79744
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65401
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
While what this round() function does is documented, it still seems
hard to follow what happens when reading a call. I tried to come up
with a better name, but eventually reading an explicit ALIGN_UP()
worked best.
Change-Id: Ifd49270bbae0ee463a996643fc76bce1f97ec9b7
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65400
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
These comments are a very nice example of documented code. The
comment blocks use the full, allowed line length, though. That
is nice for code, but can make text blocks harder to read. So
reflow the comments to a 72-char width (like we use in emails
and commit messages).
Also add some articles where they seemed missing and fix some
smaller nits.
Change-Id: If4cdbb383cf67f01200c8e4163fc3c576a5c3a87
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65399
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
The comment said special care needs to be taken if a resource cannot
be allocated. However, the opposite seems true: There is nothing to
be done, we simply leave the resource w/o the IORESOURCE_ASSIGNED
flag. There's also no code to be found that would currently do some-
thing special. allocate_child_resources() directly continues with
the next resource after printing an error.
Change-Id: I21acbc891ea4dfb62decf9abe0ace91016486116
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65412
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
These should help to make the reviews as platforms
remove KiB scaling.
Change-Id: I40644f873c0ea993353753c0ef40df4c83233355
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55474
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Function fixed_io_resource() and alias io_resource() were
previously unused. Unlike previously, IORESOURCE_STORED flag
needs to be set by the caller, when necessary.
For fixed resources, fields alignment, granularity and
limit need not be initialised, as the resource cannot
be moved. It is assumed the caller provides valid base
and size parameters.
Change-Id: I8fb4cf2dee4f5193e5652648b63c0ecba7b8bab2
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55458
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Unlike fixed_mem_resource_kb() the arguments are not in KiB.
This allows coccinelle script to assign the base and size
without applying the KiB division or 10 bit right-shift.
Unlike with fixed_mem_resource_kb() the IORESOURCE_STORED flag is
passed in the flags parameter until some inconsistencies in the tree
get resolved.
Change-Id: I2cc9ef94b60d62aaf4374f400b7e05b86e4664d2
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55436
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
There is a lot of going back-and-forth with the KiB arguments, start
the work to migrate away from this.
Change-Id: I329864d36137e9a99b5640f4f504c45a02060a40
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64658
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
When trying to find the parent i2c bus of a given device, ensure that
the bus link doesn't point to itself, else we'll get stuck in an
infinite loop.
Change-Id: I56cb6b2a3e4f98d2ce3ef2d8298e74d52661331c
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65229
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
This patch adds the I2C equivalent of an SMBus quick write to an I2C
device, which is used by some I2C drivers as a way to probe the
existence (or absence) of a certain device on the bus, based on
whether or not a 0-byte write to an I2C address is ACKed or NACKed.
i2c_dev_detect() is implemented using the existing i2c bus ops transfer()
function, so no further work is needed for existing controller drivers
to utilize this functionality.
Change-Id: I9b22bdc0343c846b235339f85d9f70b20f0f2bdd
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64537
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@tutanota.com>
When a PCI resource is marked as 64-bits, the IORESOURCE_ABOVE_4G flag
needs to be passed to the v4 allocator to ensure that the resource will
be allocated in a range large enough to succeed.
BUG=b:214443809
TEST=agah can successfully allocate all of the Nvidia GN20 BARs
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I3f16f52f2a64f8728853df263da29871dca533f7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64725
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@tutanota.com>
coreDOOM is a port of DOOM to libpayload, based on the doomgeneric
source port. It renders the game to the coreboot linear framebuffer,
and loads WAD files from CBFS.
Tested with QEMU i440fx/q35 and a Dell Latitude E6400 using the
libgfxinit provided linear framebuffer.
Project page: https://github.com/nic3-14159/coreDOOM
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ice0403b003a4b2717afee585f28303c2f5abea5d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57222
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@tutanota.com>
This will replace LOG_{MEM/IO}_RESOURCE macros once
the new resource constructors are available.
Change-Id: I21b030dc42dcb8e462b29f49499be5fd31ea38f5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55476
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
