They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
ACPI Version 6.3 Section 6.1: "A device object must contain either an _HID
object or an _ADR object, but should not contain both."
Found-by: ACPICA 20191018
Change-Id: I8bcdfa7a4dc33c3e3866d3135249a602379b9615
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36265
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Use acpigen_write_processor_cnot to implement notifications to the CPU.
Automatically generate \PPKG in SSDT.
Change-Id: Iecc54e94484f5f11e0ba8ef6d1d844276e484b4d
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29886
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
As per the ACPI specification, there are two types of power button
devices:
1. Fixed hardware power button
2. Generic hardware power button
Fixed hardware power button is added by the OSPM if POWER_BUTTON flag
is not set in FADT by the BIOS. This device has its programming model
in PM1x_EVT_BLK. All ACPI compliant OSes are expected to add this
power button device by default if the power button FADT flag is not
set.
On the other hand, generic hardware power button can be used by
platforms if fixed register space cannot be used for the power button
device. In order to support this, power button device object with HID
PNP0C0C is expected to be added to ACPI tables. Additionally,
POWER_BUTTON flag should be set to indicate the presence of control
method for power button.
Chrome EC mainboards implemented the generic hardware power button in
a broken manner i.e. power button object with HID PNP0C0C is added to
ACPI however none of the boards set POWER_BUTTON flag in FADT. This
results in Linux kernel adding both fixed hardware power button as
well as generic hardware power button to the list of devices present
on the system. Though this is mostly harmless, it is logically
incorrect and can confuse any userspace utilities scanning the ACPI
devices.
This change gets rid of the generic hardware power button from all
google mainboards and relies completely on the fixed hardware power
button.
BUG=b:110913245
TEST=Verified that fixed hardware power button still works correctly
on nautilus.
Change-Id: I733e69affc82ed77aa79c5eca6654aaa531476ca
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27272
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Currently the throttle event handler method THRM is defined as an
extern on the intel bd82x6x and lynxpoint chipsets, then defined
again in the platform with thermal event handling. In newer versions
of IASL, this generates an error, as the method is defined in two
places. Simply removing the extern causes the call to it to fail on
platforms where it isn't actually defined, so add a preprocessor define
where it's implemented, and only call the method on those platforms.
This also requires moving the thermal handler, which now includes
the define to before the gnvs asl file.
TEST=Build before and after, make sure correct code is included.
Change-Id: I7af4a346496c1352ec20bda8acb338b5d277d99b
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26123
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Use the ACPI generator for creating the Chrome OS gpio
package. Each mainboard has its own list of Chrome OS
gpios that are fed into a helper to generate the ACPI
external OIPG package. Additionally, the common
chromeos.asl is now conditionally included based on
CONFIG_CHROMEOS.
Change-Id: I1d3d951964374a9d43521879d4c265fa513920d2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This partially reverts commit 33b535f1. After this commit, samsung/lumpy had its
internal USB EHCI controller broken, with no assigned IRQ.
PIRQA-PIRQH may be wired as edge-triggered interrupts, making them exclusive
for the GPIO to use. They cannot be used for PCI devices at the same time.
Change-Id: Ic90343401ac20ca8673baf927cd7703c3481aeab
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9993
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
This code in reality just describes the southbridge features, don't put a copy
in every mainboard.
Change-Id: I8cf3019a36b1ae6a17d502e7508f36ea9fa62830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10231
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
The commit introducing support for the Google Butterfly Chromebook
commit d7bd4eb003
Author: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Feb 11 11:11:36 2013 -0800
Add support for "Butterfly" Chromebook
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2359
contains the typo, which is corrected now.
Change-Id: I932f4cd248cac71c3ede39a7da97162e791827cb
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2373
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
We're happy to announce coreboot support for the "Butterfly"
Chromebook, a.k.a HP Pavilion Chromebook.
More information at:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/hp-pavilion-chromebook.html
This commit also includes support for the ENE KB3940Q embedded controller
running on Quanta's firmware.
Change-Id: I194f847a94005218ec04eeba091c3257ac459510
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2359
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Patrick Georgi