GNUBoot
/
coreboot-kgpe-d16
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
coreboot-kgpe-d16/src/cpu/Makefile.inc

53 lines
2.0 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurable This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-20 07:11:21 +02:00
################################################################################
## Subdirectories
################################################################################
This now builds. Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4537 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-08-12 17:56:17 +02:00
subdirs-y += amd
Add initial support for DMP Vortex86EX CPU. Change-Id: I74de250c69a57109362be1b2f00c0b4aa24a64e8 Signed-off-by: Andrew Wu <arw@dmp.com.tw> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3473 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-06-19 12:55:08 +02:00
subdirs-y += dmp
armv7: Add emulation/qemu-armv7 board. To simplify testing ARM implementation, we need a QEMU configuration for ARM. The qemu-armv7 provides serial output, CBFS simulation, and full boot path (bootblock, romstage, ramstage) to verify the boot loader functionality. To run with QEMU: export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.rom Verified to boot until ramstage loaded successfully by QEMU v1.0.50. Change-Id: I1f23ffaf408199811a0756236821c7e0f2a85004 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2354 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-02-11 17:07:38 +01:00
subdirs-y += armltd
Kconfig! Works on Kontron, qemu, and serengeti. Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de> tested on abuild only. Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4534 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-08-12 17:00:51 +02:00
subdirs-y += intel
WIP: Initial support for Samsung Exynos 5250 ARM CPU Samsung SoC files, including Exynos5 (a Cortex-A15 implementation). Since this is an SoC we'll forego the x86-style {north,south}bridge and cpu distinction. We may try to split some stuff out before the final version if prudent. Change-Id: Ie068e9dc3dd836c83d90e282b10d5202e7a4ba9b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2005 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-12-08 02:18:43 +01:00
subdirs-y += samsung
beaglebone: initial Kconfig and Makefiles Initial structure of Beaglebone port Change-Id: Ia255ab207f424dcd525990cdc0d74953e012c087 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3279 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-05-26 16:15:57 +02:00
subdirs-y += ti
Kconfig! Works on Kontron, qemu, and serengeti. Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de> tested on abuild only. Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4534 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-08-12 17:00:51 +02:00
subdirs-y += via
x86: add cache-as-ram migration option There are some boards that do a significant amount of work after cache-as-ram is torn down but before ramstage is loaded. For example, using vboot to verify the ramstage is one such operation. However, there are pieces of code that are executed that reference global variables that are linked in the cache-as-ram region. If those variables are referenced after cache-as-ram is torn down then the values observed will most likely be incorrect. Therefore provide a Kconfig option to select cache-as-ram migration to memory using cbmem. This option is named CAR_MIGRATION. When enabled, the address of cache-as-ram variables may be obtained dynamically. Additionally, when cache-as-ram migration occurs the cache-as-ram data region for global variables is copied into cbmem. There are also automatic callbacks for other modules to perform their own migration, if necessary. Change-Id: I2e77219647c2bd2b1aa845b262be3b2543f1fcb7 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3232 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-10 07:33:32 +02:00
subdirs-y += x86
qemu: add x86 cpu This patch adds a qemu x86 cpu chip. It has no initialization function as this isn't needed on virtual hardware. A virtual machine can have pretty much any CPU: qemu emulates a wide range of x86 CPUs (try 'qemu -cpu ? for a list), also with 'qemu -cpu host' the guest will see a cpu which is (almost) identical to the one on the host machine. So I've added X86_VENDOR_ANY as wildcard match for the cpu_table. Change-Id: Ib01210694b09702e41ed806f31d0033e840a863f Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3344 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-31 09:23:26 +02:00
subdirs-$(CONFIG_CPU_QEMU_X86) += qemu-x86
buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurable This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-20 07:11:21 +02:00
################################################################################
## Rules for building the microcode blob in CBFS
################################################################################
cpu: Add CPU microcode file to cbfs with 16-byte alignment On x86 there is a 16-byte alignment requirement for the addresses containing the CPU microcode. The cbfs files containing the microcode are used in memory-mapped fashion when loading new mircocode. Therefore, the data payload's address/offset of a cbfs file in flash dictates the resulting alignment. Fix this by processing the CPU microcode cbfs file separately as it uses $(CBFSTOOL) to find the proper location within the provided rom image. Change-Id: Ia200d62dbcf7ff1fa59598654718a0b7e178ca4c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3663 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-06-11 23:36:37 +02:00
cpu_ucode_cbfs_name = cpu_microcode_blob.bin
buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurable This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-20 07:11:21 +02:00
# External microcode file, or are we generating one ?
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_MICROCODE_CBFS_EXTERNAL), y)
cpu: Add CPU microcode file to cbfs with 16-byte alignment On x86 there is a 16-byte alignment requirement for the addresses containing the CPU microcode. The cbfs files containing the microcode are used in memory-mapped fashion when loading new mircocode. Therefore, the data payload's address/offset of a cbfs file in flash dictates the resulting alignment. Fix this by processing the CPU microcode cbfs file separately as it uses $(CBFSTOOL) to find the proper location within the provided rom image. Change-Id: Ia200d62dbcf7ff1fa59598654718a0b7e178ca4c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3663 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-06-11 23:36:37 +02:00
cpu_ucode_cbfs_file = $(call strip_quotes,$(CONFIG_CPU_MICROCODE_FILE))
cbfs_include_ucode = y
Fix microcode selection code The ARM CPUs we know of don't have CPU microcode updates, so don't show the selection in Kconfig. Also simplify (and fix) the microcode selection in the Makefile that would try to include microcode even though none is available. Change-Id: I502d9b48d4449c1a759b5e90478ad37eef866406 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2540 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-02-27 20:24:11 +01:00
endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_MICROCODE_CBFS_GENERATE), y)
cpu: Add CPU microcode file to cbfs with 16-byte alignment On x86 there is a 16-byte alignment requirement for the addresses containing the CPU microcode. The cbfs files containing the microcode are used in memory-mapped fashion when loading new mircocode. Therefore, the data payload's address/offset of a cbfs file in flash dictates the resulting alignment. Fix this by processing the CPU microcode cbfs file separately as it uses $(CBFSTOOL) to find the proper location within the provided rom image. Change-Id: Ia200d62dbcf7ff1fa59598654718a0b7e178ca4c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3663 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-06-11 23:36:37 +02:00
cpu_ucode_cbfs_file = $(obj)/cpu_microcode_blob.bin
cbfs_include_ucode = y
buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurable This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-20 07:11:21 +02:00
endif
# In case we have more than one "source" (cough) files containing microcode, we
Fix microcode selection code The ARM CPUs we know of don't have CPU microcode updates, so don't show the selection in Kconfig. Also simplify (and fix) the microcode selection in the Makefile that would try to include microcode even though none is available. Change-Id: I502d9b48d4449c1a759b5e90478ad37eef866406 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2540 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-02-27 20:24:11 +01:00
# link them together in one large blob, so that we get all the microcode updates
buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurable This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-20 07:11:21 +02:00
# in one file. This makes it easier for objcopy in the final step.
# The --entry=0 is just here to suppress the LD warning. It does not affect the
# final microcode file.
$(obj)/cpu_microcode_blob.o: $$(cpu_microcode-objs)
@printf " LD $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(LD) -static --entry=0 $< -o $@
# We have a lot of useless data in the large blob, and we are only interested in
# the data section, so we only copy that part to the final microcode file
$(obj)/cpu_microcode_blob.bin: $(obj)/cpu_microcode_blob.o
@printf " MICROCODE $(subst $(obj)/,,$(@))\n"
$(OBJCOPY) -j .data -O binary $< $@
cpu: Add CPU microcode file to cbfs with 16-byte alignment On x86 there is a 16-byte alignment requirement for the addresses containing the CPU microcode. The cbfs files containing the microcode are used in memory-mapped fashion when loading new mircocode. Therefore, the data payload's address/offset of a cbfs file in flash dictates the resulting alignment. Fix this by processing the CPU microcode cbfs file separately as it uses $(CBFSTOOL) to find the proper location within the provided rom image. Change-Id: Ia200d62dbcf7ff1fa59598654718a0b7e178ca4c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3663 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-06-11 23:36:37 +02:00
ifeq ($(cbfs_include_ucode),y)
# Add CPU microcode to specified rom image $(1)
add-cpu-microcode-to-cbfs = \
$(CBFSTOOL) $(1) locate -f $(cpu_ucode_cbfs_file) -n $(cpu_ucode_cbfs_name) -a 16 | xargs $(CBFSTOOL) $(1) add -n $(cpu_ucode_cbfs_name) -f $(cpu_ucode_cbfs_file) -t 0x53 -b
else
add-cpu-microcode-to-cbfs = true
endif