Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Martin Roth
f812c44f00 intel/braswell: Build in both C0 and 'other' vbios
The Braswell CPU seems to have two different Video BIOS roms, one for
the C0 revision, and one for other revisions.  Build them both into
the coreboot image, and let coreboot sort out which one should be used
at runtime.  This should allow one rom to be used for all revisions.

The initial reason for this patch was that the Kconfig symbol
C0_DISP_SUPPORT didn't exist, and was causing issues.  This
seems like the best way to eliminate the need for that symbol.

Change-Id: I5b9f225c0daf4e02fda75daf9cd07bb160bf0e0f
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12826
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2016-01-06 17:41:49 +01:00
Stefan Reinauer
1d05731e11 braswell/skylake: Add FspUpdVpd.h to fix compilation
Imported from cros repo 18ae19c

Change-Id: Ib88ac9b37d2f86d323b9a04cb17a5a490c61ff5b
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12467
Reviewed-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-12-04 17:26:26 +01:00
Alexandru Gagniuc
1d85700503 cpu: microcode: Use microcode stored in binary format
Using a copiler to compile something that's already a binary is pretty
stupid. Now that Stefan converted most microcode in blobs to a plain
binary, use the binary version.

Change-Id: Iecf1f0cdf7bbeb7a61f46a0cd984ba341af787ce
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-30 06:57:19 +00:00
Aaron Durbin
7dcb545ee2 intel: auto include intel/common/firmware
Instead of selecting the Kconfig option and adding the subdir
entry within each chipset auto include the common/firmware
directory as it's guarded by HAVE_INTEL_FIRMWARE.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:43462
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built glados.

Change-Id: I166db67c41b16c4d9f0116abce00940514539fa5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11734
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-29 13:55:52 +00:00
Martin Roth
3fda3c2f8d Move final Intel chipsets with ME to intel/common/firmware
This switches the final 4 Intel platforms that use ME firmware from
using code specific to the platform to the common IFD Kconfig and
Makefile.

braswell, broadwell, bd82x6x (cougar point & panther point) and ibexpeak

Change-Id: Id3bec6dbe2e1a8a90f51d9378150dbb44258b596
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10876
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2015-09-16 14:36:01 +00:00
Aaron Durbin
789f2b6c43 fsp1_1: provide binding to UEFI version
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:

1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
   EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
   build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
   files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
   versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
   proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
   flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
   structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
   file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
   FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
   structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
   because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
   near impossible to forward declare structs.

The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).

The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
   selects. No other bindings are currently available,
   but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
   paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
   it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
   expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
   include path. This split can allow a version 2,
   for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
   Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
   APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
   types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
   (fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
   doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
   the FSP relocation code.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>

Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-09-10 17:52:28 +00:00
Aaron Durbin
3953e3947d x86: bootblock: remove linking and program flow from build system
The build system was previously determining the flow
and linking scripts bootblock code by the order of files
added to the bootblock_inc bootblock-y variables.Those
files were then concatenated together and built by a myriad of
make rules.

Now bootblock.S and bootblock.ld is added so that bootblock
can be built and linked using the default build rules.
CHIPSET_BOOTBLOCK_INCLUDE is introduced in order to allow the
chipset code to place include files in the path of the bootblock
program -- a replacement for the chipset_bootblock_inc
make variable.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built vortex, rambi, and some asus boards.

Change-Id: Ida4571cbe6eed65e77ade98b8d9ad056353c53f9
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11495
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-09 03:22:58 +00:00
Alexandru Gagniuc
3cd280589c soc/*/Makefile.inc: Do not add soc/common as a subdir
Aaron Durbin found that soc/common is already included as a subdir via
the wildcard in Makefile.inc:
  subdirs-y += $(wildcard src/soc/*/*)
Since the entire file is protected by CONFIG_SOC_INTEL_COMMON, there
is no problem with including it for every platform. On the other hand,
when it is included by the skylake and braswell makefiles, any rule is
duplicated. As a result fix the braswell and skylake makefiles.

Change-Id: If5bad903c78dbce418852935ee55cdc7162b3b2d
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11439
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-08-28 20:40:37 +00:00
Lee Leahy
acb9c0b661 Braswell: Update to end of June.
Remove some CamelCase in acpi.c
Add FSP PcdDvfsEnable configuration parameter.
Add lpc_init and lpc_set_low_power routines.
Remove Braswell reference to make code easier to port to another SOC.

BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on cyan

Change-Id: I5063215fc5d19b4a07f3161f76bf3d58e30f6f02
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10768
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-07-06 18:45:23 +02:00
Lee Leahy
32471729d9 Braswell: Add Braswell SOC support
Add the files to support the Braswell SOC.

BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for a Braswell platform

Change-Id: I968da68733e57647d0a08e4040ff0378b4d59004
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10051
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-06-25 21:50:48 +02:00
Lee Leahy
77ff0b1a01 Braswell: Use Baytrail as Comparison Base
Add baytrail source for comparison with Braswell.

BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None

Change-Id: I5170addf41676d95a3daf070a32bcee085f8156d
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10117
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-23 01:40:57 +02:00