When dealing with DMA, we need a function to invalidate cache without corrupting
contents on main memory (clean).
Change-Id: I28e632ae57a7b7ed1accee74e76045b92f92a699
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/61078
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4345
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The OP assigned by dcache_clean_by_mva must be handled in
dcache_op_mva.
Change-Id: Ib32262f0419453b2690d7c1a1c6602380b46a37f
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/61077
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4344
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
- Add -ffreestanding and -fomit-frame-pointer for all
platforms.
- Add ARMv7 specific flags to the armv7 Makefile
Change-Id: I71ab1b096e505940cc20c266bccd43917bcfad3a
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/56104
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4317
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Currently, the exception handling code on ARM in libpayload turns on alignment
checks as an easy way to generate an exception for testing purposes. It was
leaving it on which disabled unaligned accesses for other, unlreated code
running later. This change adjusts the code so the original value of the
alignment bit is restored after the test exception.
Built and booted into depthcharge on pit with an unaligned accesses added
after the call to exception_init in the depthcharge's main. Before this
change, the access caused an exception. After this change, the access
completed successfully.
Change-Id: If92cab3cc8eabca7c5b0560ce88a8796a27fe3b2
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59372
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4255
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The address range to scan for the coreboot tables varies from machine to
machine based on the range memory occupies on the SOC being booted and on the
amount of memory installed on the machine. To make libpayload work on
different ARM systems with different needs, this change makes the region to
scan configurable. In the future, we might want to come up with a more
automatic mechanism like on x86, although there's less consistency on ARM as
far as what ranges are even memory in the first place.
Change-Id: Ib50efe25a6152171b0fbd0e324dbc5e89c527d6e
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59242
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4254
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Otherwise the code would try to parse GPIOs when encountering
a mainboard entry in the coreboot table. This never caused any
problems because the mainboard entry is parsed before the GPIO
entry.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Change-Id: I1443bda8585a990a39115743d48304ec4b54bccb
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59292
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4252
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Change-Id: I3235f42c7faaf28a63455162ea55dc1a6bebd1f5
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/48290
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4128
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This imports the cache/MMU code from coreboot as of 1877cee.
Change-Id: I97ec8b9640921a94a4b27d89e4ae6185e9f96f18
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/48288
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4134
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The memset and memcpy functions are assembled as ARM code, likely because
that's the default of the assembler. Without special annotation, the assembler
and linker don't know that those symbols are functions which need special
handling so that ARM/thumb issues are handled properly. This change adds that
annotation which gets those functions working in Coreboot which is compiled as
thumb. Libpayload and depthcharge are compiled as ARM so they don't *need* the
annotation since it just works out in ARM mode, but it's the safe thing to do
in case we change that in the future.
We should explicitly select ARM vs. thumb when assembling assembly files to be
consistent across builds and toolchains.
Change-Id: I814b137064cf46ae9e2744ff6c223b695dc1ef01
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3672
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This imports the newest cache and MMU code from coreboot. This
time it's so new that it hasn't even been checked in to coreboot.
However, this version at least allows DMA to work properly for the
MSHC driver. So even if we rebase a few more times, this version is
at least a step in the right direction.
Note: This omits the stuff that sets up dcache policy since
libpayload should not need to worry about that and it depends
on cbmem stuff.
Change-Id: Idd42b083e8019634aaaa44d5bf5b51db6c3912f5
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2975
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
This imports the new cache maintenance API from coreboot at
commit bba8090. This is a BSD-licensed implementation which
exposes cache maintenance opertaions necessary for payloads
for things such as DMA transfers.
Change-Id: I554676db89517bebc6edae4f7ab7e5882e6f986d
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2974
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
After another incident related to virtual pointers in lib_sysinfo (and
resulting confusion), I decided to put some comments on the matter into
the code.
Remember, we decided to always use virtual pointers in lib_sysinfo, but
it's not always obvious from the code, that they are.
See also:
425973c libpayload: Always use virtual pointers in struct sysinfo_t
593f577 libpayload: Fix use of virtual pointers in sysinfo
Change-Id: I886c3b1d182cba07f1aab1667e702e2868ad4b68
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2878
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The timekeeping code in libpayload was dependent on rdtsc, and when it was
split up by arch, that code was duplicated even though it was mostly the same.
This change factors out actually reading the count from the timer and the
speed of the timer and puts the definitions of ndelay, udelay, mdelay and
delay into generic code. Then, in x86, the timer_hz and timer_get_raw_value
functions which used to be in depthcharge were moved over to libpayload's
arch/x86/timer.c. In ARM where there isn't a single, canonical timer, those
functions are omitted with the intention that they'll be implemented by a
specific timer driver chosen elsewhere.
Change-Id: I9c919bed712ace941f417c1d58679d667b2d8269
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2717
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
I didn't realize we don't enable 14 year old features when building
libpayload, and I must have accidentally not rebuilt everything when making my
final tweaks to my earlier change.
Change-Id: I6caeeffad177b6d61fa30175f767e85084c061f4
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2718
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Don't keep using the coreboot stack on ARMv7.
Change-Id: I734c5d77f8584e30ee0c720d41e21e3040f56db4
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2668
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Give some indication what happened instead of just crashing.
As part of setup, cause an exception and make sure that we get
the right one, and that we recover correctly. Hence we have
some assurance that if they really happen we can handle them.
Built and booted into test payload on Snow. Saw the built in test function
worked correctly. Artificially added code which got an exception and saw that
the error information prints correctly.
Change-Id: I2e0d022f090ee422fb988074fbb197afa2485caa
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2569
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
The linker uses that info so interworking can work correctly.
Built and booted into depthcharge on Snow and saw interworking start to
work correctly.
Change-Id: I0ac54f1c424ec70f8244edf6541a10b089ce47b4
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2568
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Not only were these files checked in with the Chromium OS Authors
copyright, but in addition they were wrongly licensed as GPL.
Switch to 3-clause BSD (and, since we're changing it, fix copyright,
too)
Change-Id: I3656c1f4304d53e343d89bb7c909fd4b929249f4
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2456
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
These live at the bottom of memory on x86, but that's IO mapped on the exynos.
The particular range used will likely need to be configurable, but this will
make it work in one more case than it used to.
Change-Id: I4d4963b9732cf538d00f8effb4398f30cbbde6aa
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2410
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
I think this needs to be its own ldscript. I'm pretty sure this one
is going to need some work however. Is libpayload PIC? That would be
best if so.
Change-Id: I44578d70dfa72de527af8901a86583c2a60130ec
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2398
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
This compiles, but it's not tested yet.
Change-Id: I2f73a814649aa36c39af3e77cefd8a968671f5c0
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2035
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Hung-Te Lin